- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How do feel about Maternity and Paternity Leave
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:35 pm to Salmon
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:35 pm to Salmon
quote:
you don't give your employees PTO?
single people don't take PTO?
I've never worked anywhere this hasn't been provided. Married with kids generally uses it more frequently. That's not even debatable.
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:36 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
More proof you're a simpleton.
I think you're a simpleton. See how easy that is?
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:37 pm to DupontsCircle
quote:
Just because at my firm I wouldn't pay for you and your family to gallivant across Disney World on my dime doesn't make me a bad employer.
Actually, yeah, it does make you a shitty employer. Unless I was truly desperate, I'd never work for a company that didn't provide PTO, and then once I got the job, I'd be looking immediately looking for another job. You can't possibly convince me you keep good people without PTO. What's next? You don't provide them health insurance coverage?
This post was edited on 8/10/16 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:37 pm to DupontsCircle
quote:
Married with kids generally uses it more frequently. That's not even debatable.
I never had any left over at the end of the year when I was single...and I still don't now
all the single people in my office use all their PTO as well
most of mine comes in more frequent, smaller increments I guess, while the single people take more full weeks off
not sure which one causes more inconvenience though...
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:38 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Actually, yeah, it does make you a shitty employer. Unless I was truly desperate, I'd never work for a company that didn't provide PTO, and then once I got the job, I'd be looking immediately looking for another job. You can't possibly convince me you keep good people without PTO. What's next? You don't provide them health insurance coverage?
LOL what. He said he wife's company was paying for their trip to Disney World. Not the time off. I am confused how this has turned into I'm against PTO.
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:39 pm to DupontsCircle
quote:
I wouldn't pay for you and your family to gallivant across Disney World on my dime doesn't make me a bad employer.
Everyone has PTO. I work for a for profit hospital that at one point literally made us supply our own stationary, and I get 8 hours a check of PTO.
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:39 pm to DupontsCircle
quote:
I am confused how this has turned into I'm against PTO.
well you claimed families taking off time for vacations and whatnot was a negative somehow, so...
if they have the PTO, are they not supposed to use it?
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:40 pm to DupontsCircle
quote:
what. He said he wife's company was paying for their trip to Disney World. Not the time off. I am confused how this has turned into I'm against PTO.
Never mind then. Thought you meant you weren't paying them at all when they took vacation.
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:40 pm to DupontsCircle
quote:
Married with kids generally uses it more frequently. That's not even debatable.
PTO is PTO. If it can be accrued, you'll pay it one way or the other. If it can't be accrued, then married and single employees are using it up by the end of the year anyway.
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:41 pm to JJ27
quote:
Everyone has PTO.
Ehh, if you work on commissions there is no such thing, but your overall point is basically true.
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:44 pm to Salmon
quote:
well you claimed families taking off time for vacations and whatnot was a negative somehow, so...
if they have the PTO, are they not supposed to use it?
Sure but there is something to be said for scheduled vs. unscheduled.
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:46 pm to DupontsCircle
I'll give you that
still don't know where the "minimal effort" part comes from though
people with families work harder because they have more to work/provide for in my experience
losing their job is a lot more devastating than a single person
still don't know where the "minimal effort" part comes from though
people with families work harder because they have more to work/provide for in my experience
losing their job is a lot more devastating than a single person
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:50 pm to Salmon
quote:
still don't know where the "minimal effort" part comes from though
I've working in consulting in the public sector with hard submission deadlines. Often, we're given smaller lead times to deliver than we originally charted and were expected. Some times you have to stay late, you've got to put in OT to get the proposal/report/etc. into the client for delivery, etc.
It's a chew em up spit them out world. You're going to work your arse off at times. I've found people with hard family responsibilities don't thrive in that environment that require flexible scheduling. It's more strain on them and they burn out.
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:50 pm to JJ27
quote:
What do you do though? You can't tell someone they can't get pregnant.
you can't say this because unless it is a physical impossibility, it's an illogical statement. Otherwise, what is wrong with adding a condition to the end of that statement? It's just that our culture puts pregnancy on a pedestal as this untouchable "right" that no one can call into question, but it's just one of many life decisions that can and should have consequences good and bad.
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:55 pm to BulldogXero
quote:
Otherwise, what is wrong with adding a condition to the end of that statement?
Because if you ever put that to paper, you would get sued for millions. No lawyer would ever approve of a citation of employment when it comes to pregnancy in the workplace. The other lawyers in your area however would piss themselves with joy on the prospect of stealing all your money from under you. You would go bankrupt immediately after putting a pregnancy condition at the end of a statement.
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:59 pm to DupontsCircle
Would not call it burn out
Those people desire more of a work - life balance than you deem acceptable
You want people that live to work, and that is ok.
Those people desire more of a work - life balance than you deem acceptable
You want people that live to work, and that is ok.
Posted on 8/10/16 at 2:01 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Because if you ever put that to paper, you would get sued for millions. No lawyer would ever approve of a citation of employment when it comes to pregnancy in the workplace. The other lawyers in your area however would piss themselves with joy on the prospect of stealing all your money from under you. You would go bankrupt immediately after putting a pregnancy condition at the end of a statement.
Because in our culture, this is seen as discrimination, but my question is why?
Posted on 8/10/16 at 2:04 pm to BulldogXero
Because apparently minorities, pregnant women, women and every other disabled person wouldn't get a job without government interference.
Posted on 8/10/16 at 2:04 pm to DupontsCircle
quote:
I've working in consulting in the public sector with hard submission deadlines. Often, we're given smaller lead times to deliver than we originally charted and were expected. Some times you have to stay late, you've got to put in OT to get the proposal/report/etc. into the client for delivery, etc.
It's a chew em up spit them out world. You're going to work your arse off at times. I've found people with hard family responsibilities don't thrive in that environment that require flexible scheduling. It's more strain on them and they burn out.
I understand as I was there once and I quit to go to a much smaller, more relaxed firm
I wouldn't say I "burned out" though, it was a calculated decision as even though my current salary is higher than it was at the old firm, my overall earning potential is lower in the long term, but its worth it IMO
Posted on 8/10/16 at 2:04 pm to OMLandshark
quote:quote:Actually, yeah, it does make you a shitty employer. Unless I was truly desperate, I'd never work for a company that didn't provide PTO, and then once I got the job, I'd be looking immediately looking for another job. You can't possibly convince me you keep good people without PTO. What's next? You don't provide them health insurance coverage?
Just because at my firm I wouldn't pay for you and your family to gallivant across Disney World on my dime doesn't make me a bad employer.
I think you're confusing what he said.
Someone upthread said their company paid for them to go to Disney. I assume he meant the company paid for their tickets, resorts, etc. Not just paid him for the time off on his vacation.
Popular
Back to top


2




