Started By
Message

re: How do feel about Maternity and Paternity Leave

Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:35 pm to
Posted by DupontsCircle
Dupont Circle
Member since Jun 2016
5823 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

you don't give your employees PTO?

single people don't take PTO?



I've never worked anywhere this hasn't been provided. Married with kids generally uses it more frequently. That's not even debatable.

Posted by DupontsCircle
Dupont Circle
Member since Jun 2016
5823 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

More proof you're a simpleton.


I think you're a simpleton. See how easy that is?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Just because at my firm I wouldn't pay for you and your family to gallivant across Disney World on my dime doesn't make me a bad employer.


Actually, yeah, it does make you a shitty employer. Unless I was truly desperate, I'd never work for a company that didn't provide PTO, and then once I got the job, I'd be looking immediately looking for another job. You can't possibly convince me you keep good people without PTO. What's next? You don't provide them health insurance coverage?
This post was edited on 8/10/16 at 1:38 pm
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86686 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Married with kids generally uses it more frequently. That's not even debatable.


I never had any left over at the end of the year when I was single...and I still don't now

all the single people in my office use all their PTO as well

most of mine comes in more frequent, smaller increments I guess, while the single people take more full weeks off

not sure which one causes more inconvenience though...
Posted by DupontsCircle
Dupont Circle
Member since Jun 2016
5823 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:38 pm to
quote:


Actually, yeah, it does make you a shitty employer. Unless I was truly desperate, I'd never work for a company that didn't provide PTO, and then once I got the job, I'd be looking immediately looking for another job. You can't possibly convince me you keep good people without PTO. What's next? You don't provide them health insurance coverage?


LOL what. He said he wife's company was paying for their trip to Disney World. Not the time off. I am confused how this has turned into I'm against PTO.
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
62329 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't pay for you and your family to gallivant across Disney World on my dime doesn't make me a bad employer.


Everyone has PTO. I work for a for profit hospital that at one point literally made us supply our own stationary, and I get 8 hours a check of PTO.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86686 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

I am confused how this has turned into I'm against PTO.


well you claimed families taking off time for vacations and whatnot was a negative somehow, so...

if they have the PTO, are they not supposed to use it?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

what. He said he wife's company was paying for their trip to Disney World. Not the time off. I am confused how this has turned into I'm against PTO.



Never mind then. Thought you meant you weren't paying them at all when they took vacation.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Married with kids generally uses it more frequently. That's not even debatable.




PTO is PTO. If it can be accrued, you'll pay it one way or the other. If it can't be accrued, then married and single employees are using it up by the end of the year anyway.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Everyone has PTO.


Ehh, if you work on commissions there is no such thing, but your overall point is basically true.
Posted by DupontsCircle
Dupont Circle
Member since Jun 2016
5823 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

well you claimed families taking off time for vacations and whatnot was a negative somehow, so...

if they have the PTO, are they not supposed to use it?



Sure but there is something to be said for scheduled vs. unscheduled.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86686 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:46 pm to
I'll give you that

still don't know where the "minimal effort" part comes from though

people with families work harder because they have more to work/provide for in my experience

losing their job is a lot more devastating than a single person
Posted by DupontsCircle
Dupont Circle
Member since Jun 2016
5823 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

still don't know where the "minimal effort" part comes from though


I've working in consulting in the public sector with hard submission deadlines. Often, we're given smaller lead times to deliver than we originally charted and were expected. Some times you have to stay late, you've got to put in OT to get the proposal/report/etc. into the client for delivery, etc.

It's a chew em up spit them out world. You're going to work your arse off at times. I've found people with hard family responsibilities don't thrive in that environment that require flexible scheduling. It's more strain on them and they burn out.
Posted by BulldogXero
Member since Oct 2011
10377 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

What do you do though? You can't tell someone they can't get pregnant.


you can't say this because unless it is a physical impossibility, it's an illogical statement. Otherwise, what is wrong with adding a condition to the end of that statement? It's just that our culture puts pregnancy on a pedestal as this untouchable "right" that no one can call into question, but it's just one of many life decisions that can and should have consequences good and bad.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Otherwise, what is wrong with adding a condition to the end of that statement?


Because if you ever put that to paper, you would get sued for millions. No lawyer would ever approve of a citation of employment when it comes to pregnancy in the workplace. The other lawyers in your area however would piss themselves with joy on the prospect of stealing all your money from under you. You would go bankrupt immediately after putting a pregnancy condition at the end of a statement.
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
138834 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 1:59 pm to
Would not call it burn out

Those people desire more of a work - life balance than you deem acceptable

You want people that live to work, and that is ok.
Posted by BulldogXero
Member since Oct 2011
10377 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

Because if you ever put that to paper, you would get sued for millions. No lawyer would ever approve of a citation of employment when it comes to pregnancy in the workplace. The other lawyers in your area however would piss themselves with joy on the prospect of stealing all your money from under you. You would go bankrupt immediately after putting a pregnancy condition at the end of a statement.


Because in our culture, this is seen as discrimination, but my question is why?
Posted by DupontsCircle
Dupont Circle
Member since Jun 2016
5823 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 2:04 pm to
Because apparently minorities, pregnant women, women and every other disabled person wouldn't get a job without government interference.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86686 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

I've working in consulting in the public sector with hard submission deadlines. Often, we're given smaller lead times to deliver than we originally charted and were expected. Some times you have to stay late, you've got to put in OT to get the proposal/report/etc. into the client for delivery, etc.

It's a chew em up spit them out world. You're going to work your arse off at times. I've found people with hard family responsibilities don't thrive in that environment that require flexible scheduling. It's more strain on them and they burn out.


I understand as I was there once and I quit to go to a much smaller, more relaxed firm

I wouldn't say I "burned out" though, it was a calculated decision as even though my current salary is higher than it was at the old firm, my overall earning potential is lower in the long term, but its worth it IMO
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
67241 posts
Posted on 8/10/16 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

quote:

Just because at my firm I wouldn't pay for you and your family to gallivant across Disney World on my dime doesn't make me a bad employer.
Actually, yeah, it does make you a shitty employer. Unless I was truly desperate, I'd never work for a company that didn't provide PTO, and then once I got the job, I'd be looking immediately looking for another job. You can't possibly convince me you keep good people without PTO. What's next? You don't provide them health insurance coverage?


I think you're confusing what he said.

Someone upthread said their company paid for them to go to Disney. I assume he meant the company paid for their tickets, resorts, etc. Not just paid him for the time off on his vacation.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram