Started By
Message

re: How cool is this? For Sale: 1987 Buick GNX With Just 8 (Yes, Eight) Original Miles

Posted on 2/15/19 at 11:03 pm to
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 11:03 pm to
Not only that you should be lined up equal at the start as well.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

Ehhh.... most all the tests I recall from back then showed the GNX wasn't all that much quicker than a regular GN.

While being about 10 grand more.


I didn't mean a GN. Buick made the Regal available with a less potent turbocharged V6 before they made the GN version.
This post was edited on 2/15/19 at 11:21 pm
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49249 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 11:29 pm to
That was way back and way slower.

The GN's everyone talks about were the intercooled ones. And they made a T-Type version of that as well. The T-Type was just a GN with paint and interior options. Essentially a factory sleeper.

IIRC the first Grand National was just an appearance package that didn't even have a turbo. Either way 86 is when they got fast.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25628 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

The timing lights are tripped by the tires, not the bumper.


The pre-stage and staging lights are very low and always tripped by the tire. The trap and timing lights are higher and can be tripped by the bodywork and will be on any drag car. Now the stock ride height of a GNX would probably not catch the trap and timing light beams but one set up for racing would. This is why all the NHRA and IHRA have max spindle to front projection numbers. Why do you think so many stock bodied drag cars have beam trippers sticking out of the front, they sure aren't there for looks. It is the red part on the front of the bumper here and will be exactly the max spindle to front length for the class.

Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49249 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 11:39 pm to
I was obviously talking about a stock street car as that is what the thread is about. A GNX will trip the lights at the big end with it's tires so the front overhang is immaterial.

Have been down track before.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25628 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 11:42 pm to
quote:

Not only that you should be lined up equal at the start as well.


This is only partly true, the difference can be as much as 16" between TIRES. The staging beam and the guard beam (what starts the time and measures for red lights) is 16". So a car that shallow stages and one that deep stages may be as much as 16" apart. Some people will shallow stage because of the way they react to a sportman tree. With a shallow stage along with the driver's reaction time and the cars reaction time a driver can go between the 2nd and third bulb for example.

With a long nose (or beam tripper equipped) car vs a short nose car the distance from guard beam to the ET stop beam could be over 3 feet shorter for the long nose deep staged car.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
25628 posts
Posted on 2/15/19 at 11:53 pm to
quote:

I was obviously talking about a stock street car as that is what the thread is about. A GNX will trip the lights at the big end with it's tires so the front overhang is immaterial.


My point still stands, the advantage of a long overhand in the front was when you set them up to drag race in the days before beam trippers you had an advantage over a short overhang car, period. Low rate springs and 90/10 shocks and the GNX would trip with the bumper. We did it all the time before paddles/extenders/beam trippers became accepted.

Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 2/16/19 at 12:15 am to
quote:


That was way back and way slower.


Yeah. That's why I said the GN and GNX were completely different animals.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49249 posts
Posted on 2/16/19 at 12:40 am to
An 87 GNX is not way different than an 87 GN.

Crappy three link notwithstanding.
Posted by Croozin2
Somewhere on the water
Member since Dec 2004
3190 posts
Posted on 2/16/19 at 6:44 am to
quote:

Reminds me of the Monte Carlo from that same era.


Had a ‘88 Monte Carlo SS. Last year they made them in that configuration. Waaay underpowered with just the 5.0 litre HO but still loved that car. Wish Chevy would have offered something similar to Buick with a limited edition power plant. Pretty sure the LT1 was already offered in the Corvettes. Would have been a great option for the MC.
Posted by fishfighter
RIP
Member since Apr 2008
40026 posts
Posted on 2/16/19 at 6:51 am to
quote:

Cool find but not a fan of that car. Screams cheap 80's GM right in !one with the Cadillac Cimarron.


This. Cars and trucks from the 1980's were all plastic and very big POS. One was lucky if they got 75K miles out of one.
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
38977 posts
Posted on 2/16/19 at 7:17 am to
That is one ugly POS.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69078 posts
Posted on 2/16/19 at 8:40 am to
Thing will go from one rich collection to the other, never seeing the street.
Those were awesome cars
Posted by Balloon Huffer
Member since Sep 2010
3421 posts
Posted on 2/16/19 at 8:46 am to
I just don't get it.

So you have an old car in perfect shape. Is it cool? Yes, it is cool that a 30 year old car has 8 miles on it.

Would I drive or pay anything for it? No.

And to those of you thinking that the ladies give a shite about this...... what kind of ladies are you chasing?

Of course, I'm spoiled, I drive an amazing car. Perhaps if I was rocking a civic or F150 like most baws, this would matter to me.

Alas, it doesn't. $200k for that thing? Which is going to depreciate a shite ton every day you drive it? Yikes.

My car costs just a bit more then half of that, and every single one of you would take my car over that -- in a heart beat.
Posted by MusclesofBrussels
Member since Dec 2015
4491 posts
Posted on 2/16/19 at 9:01 am to
Weak attempt
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram