- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Houston to Dallas Bullet Train. It's happening!
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:41 am to rocket31
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:41 am to rocket31
quote:
i mean, self-driving cars already exist so thats not true
i could go buy one right now in certain citie
Show me. You're going to post a Tesla vehicle, and im going to show you how easy it is to hack into that vehicle right now.
edit: Not talking out my arse. I work in Telecom lol.
This post was edited on 8/18/17 at 10:43 am
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:42 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
You're going to post a Tesla vehicle, and im going to show you how easy it is to hack into that vehicle right now.
ok, regardless of the hacking, the car exists--- today.
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:43 am to rocket31
quote:
ok, regardless of the hacking, the car exists--- today.
Just because something exists doesn't make it available for the public to use
Edit: I should clarify. Yes you can buy a car capable of a technology. That technology is still very much in its infancy. You don't have a support structure yet to expand.
You wont for awhile.
This post was edited on 8/18/17 at 10:46 am
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:43 am to DarthRebel
Excellent post. That 1.2 Trillion we borrowed for the war on terror (close to 5 trillion when we included interest) could have went a long way on improving infrastructure, education, and healthcare.
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:44 am to 50_Tiger
its publicly available, people have them. several youtube videos out of regular joes driving "teslas with both eyes closed"
This post was edited on 8/18/17 at 10:45 am
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:44 am to LoveThatMoney
quote:
think people will ride it a lot at first as a novelty. Then they'll get over it and in 10 years TCR will be struggling mightily.
and then they'll start reducing fares and the trashy people will take over. Just like airline travel. Add me to the list of skeptics.
I also think that people will decide they like their autos better than a train or plane and keep driving to their destinations. Not all people, but enough to make the train struggle financially. For all the convenience of high speed travel, the freedom of being able to get in one's car and come and go as one pleases with/without others (of your choice) still outweighs the benefits of alternative travel. JMO.
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:45 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
i just dont think these high-speed railways have much of a future especially when we have already invested so much into our current highway infrastructure
That same argument could have been used (and probably was) at the turn of the previous century arguing against highways because we had a rail system.
We must continue to invest in our infrastructure. My only argument against is that bullet train tech is the BetaMax to Hyperloop's VHS
This post was edited on 8/18/17 at 10:47 am
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:46 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
Show me. You're going to post a Tesla vehicle, and im going to show you how easy it is to hack into that vehicle right now.
edit: Not talking out my arse. I work in Telecom lol.
You can GPS spoof airliners today yet they still have autopilot...why not cars?
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:46 am to rocket31
quote:
as opposed to self-driving cars which will be the norm in ~5 years time
I don't think that's feasible. There is no way autonomous cars would hit a price point in the next 5 years that make them "the norm". Tesla and BMW are the main consumer players, but it seems to be corporations with the heaviest investment towards autonomous vehicles Uber, Google, Intel, Trucking manufacturers, etc...
I think you're ultimately right, but just not that soon.
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:46 am to rocket31
1) refer to my edit
2) Have you also seen the same videos of folks and their crashed Teslas?
2) Have you also seen the same videos of folks and their crashed Teslas?
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:47 am to Tigeralum2008
quote:
That same argument could have been used (and probably was) at the turn of the century arguing against highways because we had a rail system.
indeed, if anything we goofed big time by tearing up the rail system in favor of the highway one.
at the time, we should have just invested more into the rail.
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:50 am to Tigeralum2008
quote:
You can GPS spoof airliners today yet they still have autopilot...why not cars?
Because these vehicles won't simply just fly by GPS.
The tech is in the category IoT and think of your car like a cell phone. It's always taking measurements and reporting these measurements to the tower.
There will always be a user / control plane. Even today you can sniff S1-U if you are a bad guy or the government.
Same thing with vehicles.
I am not 100% familiar with how airplanes report outside of GPS. I am pretty sure they do NOT report to towers. They fly too high and I have to remember how far our largest BTS Antenna propogates. Right now 60W per pipe is the max on a Nokia product.
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:50 am to MSMHater
quote:
There is no way autonomous cars would hit a price point in the next 5 years that make them "the norm". Tesla and BMW are the main consumer players, but it seems to be corporations with the heaviest investment towards autonomous vehicles Uber, Google, Intel, Trucking manufacturers, etc...
I think you're ultimately right, but just not that soon
true, the model X is about $80-100k currently.
i guess we will see, i do think a high speed train would be sweet, dont get me wrong. im just skeptical. it will be interesting to see how it all plays out
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:52 am to AUCE05
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 8:49 am
Posted on 8/18/17 at 10:57 am to goofball
quote:They've already gotten permission to tunnel through a mountain range in order to make way for their tube/track. Musk's company is called The Boring Company (yuk yuk).
And when they have a viable route up and running with a capacity of riders that rival trains or buses, they'll move beyond being just a theoretical alternative to cars or high speed rail, which itself struggles to compete with air travel in this country.
I'm not enamored with Musk like some people are, but I don't know why people would root against things like this. It's not theoretical. It's being developed, and will be beneficial when implemented.
Posted on 8/18/17 at 11:01 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
I am not 100% familiar with how airplanes report outside of GPS. I am pretty sure they do NOT report to towers. They fly too high and I have to remember how far our largest BTS Antenna propogates. Right now 60W per pipe is the max on a Nokia product.
We could page 777Tiger for the definitive answer to how aircraft report back but as far as i know, they have transponders reporting out to ATC towers all over the world. For transoceanic flights there is a constellation of communication satellites.
I was a radioman on a submarine, we used a similiar network of milsats to report our position and receive communications while at sea.
The MH370 (missing airliner) had jet engines reporting diagnostics back to the manufacturer which was one of the ways they were able to geolocate a search area
Posted on 8/18/17 at 11:06 am to Tigeralum2008
quote:
We could page 777Tiger for the definitive answer to how aircraft report back but as far as i know, they have transponders reporting out to ATC towers all over the world. For transoceanic flights there is a constellation of communication satellites.
I was a radioman on a submarine, we used a similiar network of milsats to report our position and receive communications while at sea.
The MH370 (missing airliner) had jet engines reporting diagnostics back to the manufacturer which was one of the ways they were able to geolocate a search area
I am curious about this as well.
The current strategy for IoT is small cell mapping between macro sites.
I'm working on some pretty cool shite that will transmit specific frequencies on different colors. Yes thats right. Colors.
Posted on 8/18/17 at 11:07 am to Tigeralum2008
Tiger quick question since you were on a sub.
Were your comm channels limited to 3-3.9 GHz?
Were your comm channels limited to 3-3.9 GHz?
Posted on 8/18/17 at 11:17 am to 50_Tiger
So many people in this thread that have clearly never train traveled in Europe especially for business.
I agree its a great idea for liberals and romantics, but realistically train travel in the USA rarely makes sense.
Everyone that discusses the 4 hour of wasted time driving, is only considering single passenger trips. Take a family or business trip with multiple people, and you only have one driver in 3-4+ people.
Cost: Let's say $100 round trip for tickets, not to mention parking and getting to the station. How many families are going to do this for $500 when they could drive for $100?
How many people need to go station to station? Burb to burb taking a car will probably be a sub 1 hour time difference.
Don't forget waiting on trains and only select times. How many trips a day is realistic? Let's say 8? That's every 2 hours. So now if you have to wait an hour for a train when you could be driving, your break even period is nothing.
Even in Europe, train travel rarely makes sense if you own a vehicle and have more than 1 person making the trip.
America is way too spread out for trains. European towns and especially cities are WAAAAY more condensed. Which makes train and mass transit make much more sense. Again, I'd love to see more trains I just think its a pipe dream right now.
I agree its a great idea for liberals and romantics, but realistically train travel in the USA rarely makes sense.
Everyone that discusses the 4 hour of wasted time driving, is only considering single passenger trips. Take a family or business trip with multiple people, and you only have one driver in 3-4+ people.
Cost: Let's say $100 round trip for tickets, not to mention parking and getting to the station. How many families are going to do this for $500 when they could drive for $100?
How many people need to go station to station? Burb to burb taking a car will probably be a sub 1 hour time difference.
Don't forget waiting on trains and only select times. How many trips a day is realistic? Let's say 8? That's every 2 hours. So now if you have to wait an hour for a train when you could be driving, your break even period is nothing.
Even in Europe, train travel rarely makes sense if you own a vehicle and have more than 1 person making the trip.
America is way too spread out for trains. European towns and especially cities are WAAAAY more condensed. Which makes train and mass transit make much more sense. Again, I'd love to see more trains I just think its a pipe dream right now.
This post was edited on 8/18/17 at 11:20 am
Posted on 8/18/17 at 11:24 am to baldona
quote:
Everyone that discusses the 4 hour of wasted time driving, is only considering single passenger trips. Take a family or business trip with multiple people, and you only have one driver in 3-4+ people.
1) It's an 8 hour round trip. If you are lucky.
2) I typically travel for business alone. I know that may vary by company.
3) Pretty hard to get substantial work done in a standard vehicle.
4) People with families will see the financial incentive to drive and therefore, are not prime candidates to use the rail.
5) People wait on airlines all the time, what makes waiting for a train any different?
Popular
Back to top



2




