- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/2/24 at 9:03 pm to Horsemeat
quote:
You should read the whole thread. There's this amazing post where I stated that I do have uninsured motorist coverage!
Good luck arguing your fender bender is a bodily injury claim (at least in LA).
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:02 pm to Horsemeat
They really need to start cracking down on these drivers without insurance coverage. I have 3 different relatives that have gotten into accidents within the last 6 months and all of them were caused by uninsured drivers. It's ridiculous.
Posted on 2/2/24 at 10:38 pm to BigBinBR
Then why so they try to sell it to you if it isn’t allowable? Have to sign a declination of uninsured or underinsured vehicle if you don’t want it. It’s on my card I have it with full coverage.
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:17 pm to Horsemeat
I've had that happen to me 4 times, well to me and my kids all total. It's sickening. The 4th time the trooper came talk to me and I went off and said if he let's them get away I'm gonna go nuts about this. He cuffed them and put in back of his unit. Sad part is, prob let them go later. One of the officers from a previous wreck told me that he didn't fell like dealing with it bc it takes several hours to process them and he gets off in 1 hour. I'm like why can't they just deal with the problem.
Posted on 2/2/24 at 11:33 pm to upgrade
quote:
Uhhhhh the accident report from the officer should make it clear who is at fault.
Uhhhh the officer can't determine at any level of certainty who is at fault and how to apportion blame when 2 or more cars collide behind the front vehicle. Without clear video or excellent eye witness testimony it is hard to determine if cars in the middle of a pileup have any blame and if so how much.
Back in a previous life when I did insurance defence work I hated the rare multi-car case that went to trial, they were always a clusterfrick. The plaintiff will file against every car behind them until their is a break in the chain and the trail revolves around everyone eliciting very specific (usually clearly well rehearsed) testimony and if the damages are high enough accident deconstructionists and engineers.
In general, these are the types of cases just worked out between the insurance companies apportioning blame in some basically random way because for them it all evens out over time and many accidents. Uninsured drivers in the chain are just another issue for the insurance companies to work around.
Posted on 2/3/24 at 12:12 pm to miab777
Sad thing is it’s probably only going to be more common with the cost of insurance skyrocketing
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News