- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: History thread: How did we win the Revolutionary War?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 9:57 pm to Wishnitwas1998
Posted on 3/14/15 at 9:57 pm to Wishnitwas1998
Do you even Paul Revere, brah?
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:34 pm to yankeeundercover
Don't forget the Spanish Militia from La.(including about 600 revenge seeking Acadians), marched on West Florida, capturing Baton Rouge, Mobile, and Pensacola. This ended English occupation in the Deep South.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:40 pm to dwr353
I think it was the Great Chain that prevented the British from gaining control of the Hudson River. Just ask Benedict Arnold.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:43 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
And they ended up winning (getting the North to end reconstruction and replicatinf the former state of affairs as closely as possible).
The south did not win at all I don't know where you are getting this.
The Compromise of 1877 is why reconstruction ended. Northerners wanted Hayes to be elected, when he actually lost, and they need the southern democrats support. So the agreement was get Hayes elected and they will take troops out the south and end reconstruction.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:44 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
And they ended up winning (getting the North to end reconstruction and replicatinf the former state of affairs as closely as possible).
The south did not win at all I don't know where you are getting this.
The Compromise of 1877 is why reconstruction ended. Northerners wanted Hayes to be elected, when he actually lost, and they need the southern democrats support. So the agreement was get Hayes elected and they will take troops out the south and end reconstruction.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:45 pm to Wishnitwas1998
There were many reasons. The first being that the war was not very popular in England. They had a very difficult time enlisting Englismen to fight a war across the ocean against what the common man saw as Englishmen abroad. They were forced to hire mercenaries to fill the lack of home enlistments. The crown tried to hire mercenaries from Russia and Holland but they were rebuffed by the rulers of each nation. The only ones who were hired were Prussian Hessians. They had a loyalty to King George because he was of the Hanoveran Royal family.
The second was a terrible...comical in many cases.....war prosecution by the War Cabinet. One gaffe after another. They were months late in starting the New York caimpaign in 1775 due to mismanaged logistics. The delay bought the colonists a much needed extra 6 months to plan and mobilize. Also, the first Southern campaign was targeted at Cape Fear, NC instead of the Chesapeake Bay. After being defeated in an effort to invade via the NC coast, they moved down and tried to invade via Charleston Harbor....only to be rebuffed again. Based on faulty info from the Royal Govornors of both colonies, they way over estimated the loyalist sentiment in the coastal region. The War Department was assured they would have thousands of loyalist available to fight once their ships landed....but that number in reality was hundreds. The Chesapeake Bay approach would have been an almost certain success to isolate New England. Terrible miscalculation. Yet, this hubris and underestimating of all the dynamics in play in the colonies remained a constant throughout the war.
Third was the colonies ability to wage Naval warfare along our coasts and into the rivers and estuaries. We had little success in the open seas but our sloops, whaleboats and Row Galleys were critical in slipping in and out of places the larger British ships could not access. This allowed us to provision troops with European supplies brought up from the West Indies....particularly French St. Eustacious. They also enjoyed a hit and run capability against the larger British ships. Without "Washingtons Navy" as it was called, be lose.
Fourth, by invading Canada early on, the British had to worry about that region as opposed to concentrating their power and efforts in New England and the middle and southern colonies. It was a great diversionary tactic that paid dividends down the road.
Finally, the official recognition by France and Spain of our country after our victory at Saratoga eventually resulted in both countries declaring war on Britain. It had truly become a global war. They were ill equipped by that point to be in a war against the world. Make no mistake, Britain was held in disdain by every country in Europe. They had no friends or allies. The determining event took place in October of 1781 when the French fleet made haste from the West Indies and blockaded the Chesapeake Bay as Cornwalis and the British Navy desperately tried to evacuate the Yorktown Penninsula. Even though there would be additional fighting over two years....this surrender was basically the end for Britain.
The second was a terrible...comical in many cases.....war prosecution by the War Cabinet. One gaffe after another. They were months late in starting the New York caimpaign in 1775 due to mismanaged logistics. The delay bought the colonists a much needed extra 6 months to plan and mobilize. Also, the first Southern campaign was targeted at Cape Fear, NC instead of the Chesapeake Bay. After being defeated in an effort to invade via the NC coast, they moved down and tried to invade via Charleston Harbor....only to be rebuffed again. Based on faulty info from the Royal Govornors of both colonies, they way over estimated the loyalist sentiment in the coastal region. The War Department was assured they would have thousands of loyalist available to fight once their ships landed....but that number in reality was hundreds. The Chesapeake Bay approach would have been an almost certain success to isolate New England. Terrible miscalculation. Yet, this hubris and underestimating of all the dynamics in play in the colonies remained a constant throughout the war.
Third was the colonies ability to wage Naval warfare along our coasts and into the rivers and estuaries. We had little success in the open seas but our sloops, whaleboats and Row Galleys were critical in slipping in and out of places the larger British ships could not access. This allowed us to provision troops with European supplies brought up from the West Indies....particularly French St. Eustacious. They also enjoyed a hit and run capability against the larger British ships. Without "Washingtons Navy" as it was called, be lose.
Fourth, by invading Canada early on, the British had to worry about that region as opposed to concentrating their power and efforts in New England and the middle and southern colonies. It was a great diversionary tactic that paid dividends down the road.
Finally, the official recognition by France and Spain of our country after our victory at Saratoga eventually resulted in both countries declaring war on Britain. It had truly become a global war. They were ill equipped by that point to be in a war against the world. Make no mistake, Britain was held in disdain by every country in Europe. They had no friends or allies. The determining event took place in October of 1781 when the French fleet made haste from the West Indies and blockaded the Chesapeake Bay as Cornwalis and the British Navy desperately tried to evacuate the Yorktown Penninsula. Even though there would be additional fighting over two years....this surrender was basically the end for Britain.
Posted on 3/14/15 at 10:48 pm to Methuselah
quote:
Couple of additional thoughts to what's been posted above: 1- British had pretty poor communication between various people back in England in charge of the effort and generals and leaders on the ground here. This was compounded by the fact that I think it took a month or more for a message to cross the Atlantic. 2- Some of their generals were pretty lackadaisical in prosecuting the war. They got pretty comfortable whoring around in the big cities rather than trekking through conditions out in the field. 3- our press relations / propaganda was better. We successfully promoted relatively minor victories into big deals and when Britain got serious and aggressive we successfully cast it as atrocities. These helped win over the population of the colonies which was pretty evenly split at first. (and the former helped bring help from France and I think a little aid from a couple other European countries) 4- Washington was a good judge of officer talent while the British system required people to purchase their commissions.
Thanks for the post
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconcheers.gif)
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:07 pm to Gladius Veritas
quote:
we didn't "win" it, we just made it more costly for them to keep fighting than to give us independence
Yeah...we made them quit. That's a WIN.'Murica mf'er!
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconusaflagsmiley.gif)
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:09 pm to dwr353
And everyone blames the Yankees ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/casty.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/casty.gif)
Posted on 3/14/15 at 11:45 pm to Wishnitwas1998
France. We don't like admitting it, but without the French, we wouldn't have won.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 12:04 am to RebelWriter
quote:
France. We don't like admitting it, but without the French, we wouldn't have won.
French naval support was very important in the later stages of the war. This, combined with our fighting on home soil and the British never really committing to the fight 100% (thus their extensive use of mercenaries over here) - the divided opinion in England on the prudence of the war, as well as having to divide resources among the vast British Empire during the period spread the Royal Army and Royal Navy quite thin.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 1:50 am to Wishnitwas1998
1. The logistics were too much for the British to handle. They had to sail thousands of troops across thousands of miles of ocean to make it to the colonies.
2. The Continental Army won just enough to keep themselves in the fight.
3. After the British defeat at Saratoga, NY in October 1777, the people of England began to lose faith in the conflict and gradually began withdrawing their support. A divided Parliament also didn't help the English cause either.
4. The French joined in the conflict after our victory at Saratoga, making the conflict a world war that was fought in many other places outside of the colonies. The Spanish joined the French in their war against the British two years later.
2. The Continental Army won just enough to keep themselves in the fight.
3. After the British defeat at Saratoga, NY in October 1777, the people of England began to lose faith in the conflict and gradually began withdrawing their support. A divided Parliament also didn't help the English cause either.
4. The French joined in the conflict after our victory at Saratoga, making the conflict a world war that was fought in many other places outside of the colonies. The Spanish joined the French in their war against the British two years later.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 4:07 am to Gladius Veritas
quote:
we didn't "win" it, we just made it more costly for them to keep fighting than to give us independence
I've lived in England for about 12 years now and this is pretty much what they were taught in school.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 5:22 am to Wishnitwas1998
The french naval victory outside of Yorktown was huge. But ultimately we just made it too costly for them. Honestly, a decent amount of people thought the United States would fail. Even as late as the Vienna congress, people in europe had their doubts
Posted on 3/15/15 at 8:27 am to WestCoastAg
See what had happened was the British were winning the war. All they had to do was effectively defend against the revolutionaries for a little while longer. Then, little known British General John Chavis showed up and blew the whole thing in the last two minutes.
Posted on 3/15/15 at 8:36 am to Wayne Campbell
You mean Chavis blew it again when he had the lead and the game was on the line?
Posted on 3/15/15 at 10:35 am to Dick Leverage
quote:
The determining event took place in October of 1781 when the French fleet made haste from the West Indies and blockaded the Chesapeake Bay as Cornwalis and the British Navy desperately tried to evacuate the Yorktown Penninsula. Even though there would be additional fighting over two years....this surrender was basically the end for Britain.
And that's that!
Great thread with lots of good insight.
Whenever we ponder the American Revolution, we should keep in mind that Seapower won the day for the USA. French Seapower on the open seas, and, riverine & littoral Seapower in our inland waterways.
Others mentioned very important factors, to be sure. It's quite arguable that SEAPOWER was the main factor.
What is Seapower? I'll bet Wiki has a good explanation.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)