Started By
Message
locked post

History: Crucifix discovery affects Viking Christianity

Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:21 am
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62150 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:21 am
LINK



quote:

Weighing just 13.2 grams and 4.1cm in length, the figure is made of finely articulated goldthreads and tiny fillagree pellets. It is smooth on the reverse side but has a small eye at the top for a chain. It was probably worn by a Viking woman. The dating of the crucifix, estimated at being from 900 – 950AD, is significant because it would indicate Danes embraced Christianity earlier than previously thought. At the moment, the Jelling Stones - two large runestones erected in 965AD in Jutland - are thought to be the oldest known representation of Jesus on a cross in Denmark.


quote:

Christian missionaries had been present in the country for around two hundred years before then, but had failed to convert the Vikings. However, pressures from Christian trade partners to convert, and in particular, influence from the Kingdom of Germany to the south, meant that most Danes were Christian by the end of the Viking period in 1050.


quote:

“This is a subject that certainly will have to appear in the history books in the future,” said Ms Beck. “In recent years there has been more and more signs that Christianity was widespread earlier than previously thought - and here the clearest evidence so far.”


This is meant for historical discussion, not religious.
Posted by RecordSetter
Member since Mar 2016
330 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:22 am to
Watch Vikings....
Posted by TulaneUVA
Member since Jun 2005
26238 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:22 am to
Why is that a crucifix? I know it matches the shape but that could just be a coincidence
Posted by Artie Rome
Hwy 1
Member since Jul 2014
8757 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Why is that a crucifix? I know it matches the shape but that could just be a coincidence


Looks like a happy dancing man to me.
Posted by Speedy G
Member since Aug 2013
3984 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Why is that a crucifix? I know it matches the shape but that could just be a coincidence

Yeah, it's not exactly the most complicated shape.
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
50085 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Why is that a crucifix? I know it matches the shape but that could just be a coincidence

looks like it's legs are bound with a rope or something as well as it's arms
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62150 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Why is that a crucifix? I know it matches the shape but that could just be a coincidence


Same reason that the figure on the stone is, if you click the link.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:28 am to
I love that show.
Posted by Hog on the Hill
AR
Member since Jun 2009
13494 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Why is that a crucifix? I know it matches the shape but that could just be a coincidence
I'm with you. It's a figure with its arms stretched laterally... I don't see why that has to be a crucifix. If it had stakes or something through the hands, then sure.
Posted by Hog on the Hill
AR
Member since Jun 2009
13494 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:32 am to
quote:

looks like it's legs are bound with a rope or something as well as it's arms
The "rope" around the knees doesn't make any sense. It's a cord around each leg, separately, but not around both legs at one time. If you're tying someone to a crucifix, you bind up both legs at one time with the same rope. You don't loop a rope individually around each leg.

So that doesn't make sense.

I think those "ropes" are part of the figure's clothing.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
151559 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:34 am to
Posted by Yellerhammer5
Member since Oct 2012
11051 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:34 am to
It's amazing how many people don't know that AD goes before the year.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
42606 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:36 am to
Looks like one of those artifacts you'd see on Ancient Aliens. Maybe the Vikings made contact.
Posted by ThrobJohnson69
Member since Feb 2016
86 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:40 am to
Maybe they wore it because they enjoyed a good ol' crucifixion.
Posted by HoustonGumbeauxGuy
Member since Jul 2011
33744 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:40 am to
quote:

History: Crucifix discovery affects Viking Christianity


Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62150 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:56 am to
quote:

HoustonGumbeauxGuy


Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
114938 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:58 am to
I'm just here for the Lagertha...
Posted by RecordSetter
Member since Mar 2016
330 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:58 am to
quote:

It's amazing how many people don't know that AD goes before the year.



and that you were more likely to be put on an X shape, than a cross
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
96252 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Why is that a crucifix? I know it matches the shape but that could just be a coincidence


It's clearly a human being depicted in a cross shape. It could be a coincidence, but would be a wild one. Based on the date, it is presumptively a Christian symbol (or perhaps jewelry/decoration derivative of, particularly, Catholic symbols), barring some evidence suggestive of the opposite conclusion.

At least, that's the way I interpret it.
Posted by Chuker
St George, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2015
7544 posts
Posted on 3/17/16 at 11:01 am to
quote:





first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram