- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Have y’all been reading the testimony of the Gruver case?
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:22 am to andwesway
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:22 am to andwesway
quote:
I don't understand how they could convict the guy. At no time did anyone say he was held down and forcibly fed alcohol.
That is why he isn't charged with 2nd-degree murder or manslaughter.
The criminal negligence definition may help some try to digest this case: Criminal negligence exists when, although neither specific nor general criminal intent is present, there is such disregard of the interest of others that the offender's conduct amounts to a gross deviation below the standard of care expected to be maintained by a reasonably careful man under like circumstances.
0
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:22 am to Cump11b
quote:
Honestly, being on the jury for this would blow.
well since the Advocate has reported on the front page every time Naquin farts, we all should be experts now.
Anytime we had a pledge that we didn't like, we just quit telling them when/where the parties were, quit inviting them places. They got the hint. I sure as shite wasn't going to spend money buying them booze.
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:23 am to Tshiz
quote:
He did
No shite. That's why I told him to stop there instead of telling him that he should remove his post. I've been around long enough to know that the questions will start coming fast and furious. In fact, only took three posts after yours.
This post was edited on 7/17/19 at 11:26 am
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:28 am to Kategory 5
pretty sure everyone knew a matthew naquin in their fraternity
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:30 am to Ingeniero
quote:
The Advocate article says the defense called 2 witnesses
Got it. The linked tweet makes it appear that the defense didn't call any witnesses.
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:48 am to Golfer
Jury just reached a verdict
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:48 am to geauxfish24
That was fricking quick
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:49 am to Ingeniero
Kid is toast.
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:57 am to Dizz
Guilty.
Why only a 6-person jury? I'm not familiar with La Criminal Court system...
Why only a 6-person jury? I'm not familiar with La Criminal Court system...
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:57 am to PiscesTiger
Yep, guilty of negligent homicide
LINK
LINK
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:59 am to Cump11b
the Gruver kid sounds like an immense dickhead tbh. hammered drunk 23 out of his first 28 days on campus and dumb enough to drink enough everclear to be 6x the legal limit.
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:59 am to andwesway
quote:
I don't understand how they could convict the guy. At no time did anyone say he was held down and forcibly fed alcohol. The Gruver kid could've said F it and left whenever he wanted to.
You were present during discovery?
Posted on 7/17/19 at 11:59 am to Ingeniero
How long will he serve and where?
Posted on 7/17/19 at 12:00 pm to PiscesTiger
quote:
How long will he serve and where?
could get as little as probation
max of 5 years
according to The Advocate
Posted on 7/17/19 at 12:01 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
No shite. That's why I told him to stop there instead of telling him that he should remove his post. I've been around long enough to know that the questions will start coming fast and furious. In fact, only took three posts after yours.
Yup. Could be grounds for a mistrial.
Posted on 7/17/19 at 12:09 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
guilty of negligent homicide
are you fricking kidding me?
What's the precedent or did they just set one?
Posted on 7/17/19 at 12:11 pm to tgrbaitn08
plenty of case law going back 30 years for precedent on cases exactly like this one.
Posted on 7/17/19 at 12:13 pm to Duckhammer_77
quote:
plenty of case law going back 30 years for precedent on cases exactly like this one.
Is there a way to search these? Or do I have to be a lawyer for that?
Posted on 7/17/19 at 12:14 pm to Duckhammer_77
quote:
plenty of case law going back 30 years for precedent on cases exactly like this one.
then you shouldn't have a problem citing a few
I'll wait
This post was edited on 7/17/19 at 12:15 pm
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News