Started By
Message

re: Grand Jury Takes No Action On Merritt Landry Case

Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:11 pm to
Posted by LSU CRAZY
Da Bestbank!!
Member since Dec 2004
3456 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:11 pm to
His 13yo brother Devin Coulter was arrested a couple weeks ago for armed robberies in the CBD.

Parents must be so proud
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

I don't believe LA law allows you can shoot someone in defense of property. There was no threat to his or his family's personal safety until he went outside. Your friend fricked up and may end up in jail because he made a rash decision.

Similar to the Zimmerman case, he was doing something perfectly legal although perhaps ill-advised. He has the right to go outside and investigate. Whether there was a reasonable threat - you don't know that, no one does. So he wasn't really shooting in defense of his property, that's more ancillary although it probably helps somewhat as opposed to be a Zimmerman on the street or sidewalk.

All IMO, subject to error.
Posted by Corkfather
Houston
Member since Sep 2007
19748 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

Did the oldest 14 year old in history have a weapon?


Negative.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278765 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

His 13yo brother Devin Coulter was arrested a couple weeks ago for armed robberies in the CBD.

Parents must be so proud



his older brother even called him a "professional thief".

Landry's defense for shooting him is weak, but in the end its another POS off the street.
Posted by Corkfather
Houston
Member since Sep 2007
19748 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

What was the racial makeup of the Grand Jury that was just dismissed?


It's Orleans Parish, take a wild fricking guess.
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36711 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

Yes. LA's Stand-Your-Ground statue states that civil cases can't be brought against those defending themselves under that law. Therefore, they would have to prove that he wasn't operating under STG. If they can't prove he was operating outside of the law, they can't bring the case to begin with.


Then cite it.

Don't pull the schoolyard "I don't have to"

It wasn't that tough a question. Back your shite up.

By the way, I'm on Merritt's side
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58275 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:14 pm to
Just last week in old Metairie a guy heard someone outside his house late at night. He went outside to see what was going on and a thug POS shot him 3 times.

The area where this Landry house is located had been having some armed robberies and shite happening during that time.
I'm standing by the gun owner who was on his own property doing what he thought was in the best interest for the safety of his family.

Posted by Corkfather
Houston
Member since Sep 2007
19748 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

Landry's defense for shooting him is weak


While Coulter has no defense for trespassing at 1:40 AM and was in the process of committing a felony.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423521 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

While Coulter has no defense for trespassing at 1:40 AM and was in the process of committing a felony.

you still need a certain justification to use deadly force, even if all of this is true (and it clearly is). that's why it's weak
Posted by saderade
America's City
Member since Jul 2005
25749 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

Just last week in old Metairie a guy heard someone outside his house late at night. He went outside to see what was going on and a thug POS shot him 3 times.
Was this in the news? Just curious
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36711 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

Yes. LA's Stand-Your-Ground statue states that civil cases can't be brought against those defending themselves under that law


Also, like I said at first, this
quote:

Yes. LA's Stand-Your-Ground statue states that civil cases can't be brought against those defending themselves under that law
may only apply is he is being prosecuted. Post the statute
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278765 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

While Coulter has no defense for trespassing at 1:40 AM and was in the process of committing a felony.



not sure trespassing warrants one to the head.


and to say he saw him reach for something is weak, when no gun was found. People aren't stupid.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63226 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

Landry's defense for shooting him is weak


There is just no way I don't shoot someone if I am lucky enough to be awakened by them entering my property before they get into my house.

I live in Texas, though, so I would probably be given the key to the city for my services.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:21 pm to
I'm with you. What else should the guy have done?
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36444 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:21 pm to
quote:


and to say he saw him reach for something is weak, when no gun was found. People aren't stupid.


Let's see...it was dark, and he saw the kid reach for something at his waist while in the process of committing a felony. Black teenagers are offing each other (and others) every day practically, what is so inconceivable about him thinking this kid was reaching for a gun?
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9461 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:22 pm to
The kid who got shot was on his way to being a career criminal, just like a good portion of his extended family. He was undoubtedly up to no good. I think it was something like 1:30a.m. when it happened.

The planet likely won't miss this kid's future contributions to society, but I still think Landry fricked up.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278765 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

There is just no way I don't shoot someone if I am lucky enough to be awakened by them entering my property before they get into my house.



i dont think he was awakened. He was the one doing the stalking
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

i dont think he was awakened.
Wasn't it around 2AM?
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278765 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

what is so inconceivable about him thinking this kid was reaching for a gun?


my point is he didnt see him reach for anything. It's the oldest trick in the book to justify something like that.

It was dark enough to where he couldn't see, but he somehow ended the ordeal with a single shot to the head

Chances are he didn't even announce himself. I doubt the kid even saw him.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63226 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:25 pm to
Good. His wife was pregnant at the time right? Or they just had a baby?

Mine is pregnant now and I find myself inspecting the street when I notice headlights that linger in our windows longer than normal. "Stalking" your own property isn't a crime. And it apparently is worth it every now and then.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram