- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Grand Jury Takes No Action On Merritt Landry Case
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:25 pm to boom roasted
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:25 pm to boom roasted
quote:
Wasn't it around 2AM?
yea, but it seems like he was up. He has a pregnant wife, fwiw
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:26 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Chances are he didn't even announce himself. I doubt the kid even saw him.
In other words, baseless speculation from your end.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:28 pm to REG861
quote:
In other words, baseless speculation from your end.
as baseless as most things in this thread. I'm not defending the kid at all. But my guess is Landry regrets shooting him at this point. That's all im saying
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:29 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
But my guess is Landry regrets shooting him at this point. That's all im saying
I agree with that, but it sounded like you were just playing devil's advocate for the sake of it.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:31 pm to Lester Earl
Why would he regret shooting someone he thought was about to shoot him?
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:32 pm to Corkfather
Well, if the Grand Jury was representative of the population of Orleans Parish, I'd guess 60.2% black, 30.5% white, 5.2% Hispanic or Latino, and 2.9% Asian.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:32 pm to REG861
just guessing what i think happened, considering he had the opportunity to shoot him in the head.
the kid had no gun. He he announced himself he probably flees.
Had he had a gun, i can see the kid staying put and reaching for it, and Landry having the opp to shot him in the head.
Just my guess that he popped him with no warning.
the kid had no gun. He he announced himself he probably flees.
Had he had a gun, i can see the kid staying put and reaching for it, and Landry having the opp to shot him in the head.
Just my guess that he popped him with no warning.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:32 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
and to say he saw him reach for something is weak, when no gun was found. People aren't stupid.
That's called hindsight. The law does not require omniscience.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:32 pm to John McClane
quote:
Then cite it.
LA RS 14:20 A(1),A(2), C & D as well as RS 14:19 & RS 14:22
As far as the immunity...
Act 786 of 2006 grants both civil and criminal immunity to anyone using force justifiable under RS 14:19 and 14:20.
I'll find where it relates in the Code when I feel like it.
Found it...
LA RS 9:2800.19
It even provides for attorney fees.
This post was edited on 2/27/14 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:37 pm to Lester Earl
How do know the kid didn't act like he was going for a gun to try and scare Landry? Just like someone trying to rob a bank or a convenience store and say they have a gun under their sweatshirt but never show it bc they really don't.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:43 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
How do know the kid didn't act like he was going for a gun to try and scare Landry?
what good does that do when someone has a gun pointed at you?
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:44 pm to Lester Earl
quote:He might have been startled without seeing the home owner and his first reaction was to reach for his pretend gun. Who knows?
what good does that do when someone has a gun pointed at you?
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:45 pm to boom roasted
quote:
He might have been startled without seeing the home owner and his first reaction was to reach for his pretend gun. Who knows?
right. pew pew pew pew
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:46 pm to Lester Earl
quote:At this point everyone is making shite up. Why not throw my hat into the ring?
right. pew pew pew pew
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:47 pm to boom roasted
quote:
what good does that do when someone has a gun pointed at you?
right cause these 'kids' always act rationally
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:48 pm to Corkfather
quote:
Regardless, it doesn't matter; he could've been trying to break into his car. LA Castle Doctrine includes vehicles
May want to read that Code Book again before you start poppin' caps in fools, Counselor.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:50 pm to GaryMyMan
quote:
May want to read that Code Book again before you start poppin' caps in fools, Counselor.
We're past that.
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:51 pm to White Roach
quote:
I don't believe LA law allows you can shoot someone in defense of property. There was no threat to his or his family's personal safety until he went outside. Your friend fricked up and may end up in jail because he made a rash decision. How's that gonna work out for his wife and kids?
quote:
The castle doctrine really doesn't apply here. It only applies when one is within your home or attemptung to make unlawful entry into your home. It applies to a vehicle only when you're inside it.
Quit talking out of your arse.
quote:
CASTLE LAWS
...
The law also stated homicide was justifiable in similar cases: when committed in self-defense by one who "reasonably believes" he is in danger of great bodily harm or death; to prevent a forcible felony; and to prevent trespass on private property.
LINK
quote:
They'd have an easy time prosecuting it, if the DA's Office didn't punt it to the Grand Jury to try to avoid any political fallout.
I know you've done a lot of legal research, but I think your interpretation of No Retreat is flawed. Landry didn't stand his ground. He didn't not retreat. He advanced on this guy and
escalated the situation.
If that were the case (that they'd have an easy time prosecuting it), the grand jury would have indicted him. The standard for grand jury indictment is much lower than an actual jury conviction. The defense can't even put up a defense during a grand jury trial.
This post was edited on 2/27/14 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:51 pm to Corkfather
quote:
LA Rev Stat § 14:20 (A)(1),(A)(2), (C) & (D) as well as LA Rev Statutes § 14:19 & LA § 14:22
:/
Popular
Back to top


0





