- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: France is already bickering about how they will rebuild Notre Dame Cathedral
Posted on 4/18/19 at 5:41 am to Dr RC
Posted on 4/18/19 at 5:41 am to Dr RC
Modern art is ugly af. Modern architecture is beautiful in its simplicity and elegance. With that said, modern architecture has no place on the Notre Dame Cathedral
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:27 am to weagle99
So have they caught the Muslim(s) that did it?
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:33 am to SirWinston
quote:
Pei’s Pyramid is FAAAbulous...
I’m pretty sure I FIFY.
This post was edited on 4/18/19 at 6:45 am
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:52 am to weagle99
quote:
Maybe trying to decide how to include the numerous modern genders.

Posted on 4/18/19 at 7:00 am to weagle99
I guess replacing the old spire with a minaret would just save time down the line, right?
What am I missing?
What am I missing?
Posted on 4/18/19 at 7:05 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
I guess replacing the old spire with a minaret would just save time down the line, right?
What am I missing?

Posted on 4/18/19 at 7:37 am to xiv
If you know anything about historical restoration or working at any high profile place at least here in the states the situation will make you scratch your head a little. Fire is always the main concern when dealing with older structures.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 8:52 am to GREENHEAD22
Can’t tell if you’re sort of agreeing with me or implying that I’m idiot
Posted on 4/18/19 at 8:55 am to GREENHEAD22
The problem I have with disregarding what was there before and putting something new is that it’s probably coming from some banal post-modernist architect.
Being a catholic and seeing what has happened to our churches over the last 50 years, these people can go frick themselves. People went to Notre Dame to see a masterpiece that draws a soul to God.
People don’t go to Los Angeles to see this ugly POS
Or this ugly vagina church in Oakland
I just know deep in my gut these French faguettes are about to replace that spire with a giant penis looking thing.
Being a catholic and seeing what has happened to our churches over the last 50 years, these people can go frick themselves. People went to Notre Dame to see a masterpiece that draws a soul to God.
People don’t go to Los Angeles to see this ugly POS
Or this ugly vagina church in Oakland
I just know deep in my gut these French faguettes are about to replace that spire with a giant penis looking thing.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 9:12 am to weagle99
In the US, additions to historical buildings are required to be distinct from the original structure. I assume that’s that way in Europe too due to things like the Louvre Pyramid.
The design of the new spire could come down to determining if it’s a renovation (recreation) or an addition.
The design of the new spire could come down to determining if it’s a renovation (recreation) or an addition.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 9:14 am to weagle99
More
Around 7:55pm, a man walked into St. Patrick’s Cathedral in Manhattan with gas cans and lighter fluid, and was subsequently apprehended by @NYPDCT without incident. We thank our partners for their help, and remember - if you see something, say something. – at St. Patrick's Cathedral
Around 7:55pm, a man walked into St. Patrick’s Cathedral in Manhattan with gas cans and lighter fluid, and was subsequently apprehended by @NYPDCT without incident. We thank our partners for their help, and remember - if you see something, say something. – at St. Patrick's Cathedral
Posted on 4/18/19 at 9:15 am to GREENHEAD22
I was alluding to the conspiracy aspect.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 9:16 am to RaginSaint43
I am with you, go back with something traditional or like it was before. It would be ruined if they used a modern design.
Posted on 4/18/19 at 9:20 am to RaginSaint43
The won’t ask me, but if they did, I would suggest a steel exoskeleton in a similar design to the existing features. It would be practical and be complementary to the ironwork on the Eiffel Tower. The roof and new spire could be constructed of lighter metals such as aluminum or titanium.
Popular
Back to top

0










