- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FOR SALE: Corner of Bluebonnet and Jefferson
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:06 pm to doubleb
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:06 pm to doubleb
quote:Look, you obviously have dementia. I feel for you.
If its childish then why did you bring up the council vote first?
You wrote: "The city council member who knew the guy approved the sale" as if only one city council member got to approve the sale. I replied the entire council, not just one member, voted to approve the sale. And the "city council member" you referred to having approved the sale was NOT EVEN A CITY COUNCIL MEMBER WHEN THE VOTE WAS HELD!
quote:If all public disclosure and bid (auction) laws were followed then I don't have a gripe with it. Maybe it's your fault for not paying attention to the public notices that the property sold so cheap. Maybe you should be investigated for allowing the property to sell for so little.
by backing the city I meant you are OK that they didn't care to do a proper evaluation, that they were negligent in letting this property go for nothing, and perhaps they violated state law.
Or, maybe you're just bitching for the sake of bitching......AGAIN.
quote:GFY. I've never heard of the guy before I read this thread. You're so fricking paranoid and irrational that you're bordering on being clinically insane.
or that you are friends with the developer.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:07 pm to yaherrdme
quote:
What do they mean when they say Heck "carried the deal through the process" ?
Russian would have you believe this deal happens all the time, and its just one of things that fell through the cracks.
But the article clearly says that there was a "process" to follow. Obviously Heck knew how the process worked and as an elected official he made things happen for this developer. The article even says Heck had done this once previously on another piece of property.
This was not a sheriff's sale. Unpaid taxes were not an issue, there was no lending institutions involved, this was a piece of property the city=parish purchased to widen the highway or the road.
The City-parish owned this property and it was worth something. A buyer came forward, and Heck helped the buyer get the property put on the market. But instead of selling the property in a more traditional way by hiring a broker, the city=parish chose to auction it off without setting a floor because they wanted to save money on an appraisal.
Russian says nothing wrong here, move along, the guy just got lucky. The City-Parish broker no laws. The City-Parish did nothing wrong.
I think I'm going to call my councilman, maybe I can buy the River Center cheap.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:09 pm to doubleb
quote:
1) We have a developer, a known friend of a city-parish councilman, and a city-parish who has helped him in the past to get parish property put up for sale.
This one fact right here says frick This deal and frick anyone who supports it or defends the process.
Russian, you wanna meet at Sonic?
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:09 pm to LSURussian
quote:
was NOT EVEN A CITY COUNCIL MEMBER WHEN THE VOTE WAS HELD
Is this true? Holy shite EBT (EBR autocorrects to that) is just fricking its citizens.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:12 pm to doubleb
quote:I believe what the OP's linked article says about the proper process for advertising the public notice being done according to all legal requirements. If more information comes out that the process was subverted, then I'm all for someone being held accountable for it.
because you believe they complied with the letter of the law,
quote:No, he didn't. He just said he thought an appraisal could have been made. He didn't say anywhere in the quote you provided that an appraisal was required or that any laws were broken.
when we already have a state official questioning as to whether or not they did.
If you believe a law was violated get off your arse and go fill out a complaint and try to have someone arrested for it.
Stop making shite up.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:13 pm to LSURussian
quote:
GFY. I've never heard of the guy before I read this thread. You're so fricking paranoid and irrational that you're bordering on being clinically insane.
The way you are acting leads me to believe you do know the developer personally. No way a guy gets this upset on a message board unless he has skin in the game.
If I'm insane then you're covering for your brother in law because this deal doesn't pass the smell test, the state auditor knows this, and so does this demented guy responding to you.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:15 pm to doubleb
quote:
Russian would have you believe this deal happens all the time, and its just one of things that fell through the cracks.
Please quote me where I've written anything like that. You can't do it. The rest of your post is just as silly.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:16 pm to LSURussian
It may be in this thread somewhere.. but does anyone know the actual auction date?
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:17 pm to doubleb
quote:
The way you are acting leads me to believe you do know the developer personally.
quote:
No way a guy gets this upset on a message board unless he has skin in the game.
quote:So now he's my brother-in-law???
you're covering for your brother in law
You're officially off the deep end on this.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:18 pm to yaherrdme
quote:
It may be in this thread somewhere.. but does anyone know the actual auction date?
It was advertised on three dates around Thanksgiving, if I had to guess the auction was held on Christmas Eve.
But don't worry, the letter of the law was followed, nothing is out of line here, and anyone complaining about the City-Parish selling valuable property for 10 cents on the dollar is insane.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:24 pm to yaherrdme
quote:
It may be in this thread somewhere.. but does anyone know the actual auction date?
12/7/2016
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:27 pm to LSURussian
quote:
You're officially off the deep end on this.
You "officially" declared me insane, demented, or whatever; so I can say about anything now right?
After all its all to deflect attention away from the way you've been defending Heck, the city officials, and city hall.
That's the real issue, how can this happen? Legal or illegal, we all know that none of us can get stuff like this done. Hell most of us are lucky to get the city-parish out to fix a pot hole!!
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:27 pm to LSURussian
quote:
According to the OP linked article this process to dispose of this property has been going on for quite a while....more than a year. Heck was on the council last year until he decided not to run for re-election.
My earlier point to the other poster was to refute his claim that Heck voted for the sale at the council meeting. Heck was no longer on the C-P council when the sale vote was taken.
The vote was held on December 14, 2016. Heck (along with everyone else present) voted "YEA"
GO TO PAGE 116
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:28 pm to doubleb
quote:More paranoia on your part. As another poster pointed out, the auction was held on December 7.
if I had to guess the auction was held on Christmas Eve.
The sale closed in February according the Business Report article linked on page 4 of this thread.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:28 pm to Supermoto Tiger
I feel so sorry for the tax payers of Baton Rouge, they are the ones who truly lose in this situation. Sad.
The reality of the matter is that if this auction had been advertised properly, the news outlets would have picked up the story of such a high trafficked land going up for sale and it would have drum up a competitive auction.
Honest question here, were state taxes being paid on this land, and if so, what was the property value of those taxes based on?
The reality of the matter is that if this auction had been advertised properly, the news outlets would have picked up the story of such a high trafficked land going up for sale and it would have drum up a competitive auction.
Honest question here, were state taxes being paid on this land, and if so, what was the property value of those taxes based on?
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:30 pm to Rohan
quote:
12/7/2016
So Heck was involved with listing it, and auctioning to a friend for 10k, all while he was councilman, and never mentioned the low sale price ? (but never technically voted to approve it, because his term expired)...hmmm
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:31 pm to yaherrdme
quote:
So Heck was involved with listing it, and auctioning to a friend for 10k, all while he was councilman, and never mentioned the low sale price ? (but never technically voted to approve it, because his term expired)...hmmm
Nothing to see here, you're demented or insane or both.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:33 pm to notbilly
Good to know. The Business Report article had its facts wrong when it said the sale was "earlier this year."
So the city council motion to accept the auction results was adopted unanimously?
But, I thought Ryan Heck solely approved the sale?
So the city council motion to accept the auction results was adopted unanimously?
But, I thought Ryan Heck solely approved the sale?
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:34 pm to notbilly
quote:
The vote was held on December 14, 2016. Heck (along with everyone else present) voted "YEA"
No way Russian said he was off the Council.
Posted on 8/1/17 at 3:34 pm to yaherrdme
quote:
So Heck was involved with listing it, and auctioning to a friend for 10k, all while he was councilman, and never mentioned the low sale price ? (but never technically voted to approve it, because his term expired)...hmmm
He voted for it. See my post above. The vote was held in December. It's not uncommon to sell surplus property so it's safe to say the other council members didn't realize the value of what they were voting for b/c of the 'generic' legal description of the property. No way Heck didn't know.
Popular
Back to top


3



