- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Florida hospital reports 'multiple stabbing victims,' Cops say suspect in custody
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:24 am to beerJeep
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:24 am to beerJeep
quote:
The fact that shotguns aren’t used more is honestly telling that gun choice is entirely based on what they’re told is most effective by the media and movies than what is actually most effective.
Bingo. If I'm shooting up a school, club, etc. I'm packing a shotgun.
1
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:26 am to chRxis
quote:
provided you are responsible, law abiding gun owner, what are you worried about?
An ex going to the police and making shite up.
Pissing a dickhead cop off.
Pissing off a doctor, or pissing off someone who has a doctor friend.
I can keep going. All will result in the loss of my firearms under your "plan."
But in any case, you falling back on the "if you're not doing anything wrong, what do you have to worry about" line is rather telling in how you view the world.
This post was edited on 9/11/19 at 11:28 am
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:26 am to Centinel
This thread is filled with knowledgeable gun people, and one complete fricking idiot who refuses to dive into the minutiae of gun control because he knows he’s going to get arse raped worse than Richard Simmons in jail.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:27 am to beerJeep
quote:
The fact that shotguns aren’t used more is honestly telling that gun choice is entirely based on what they’re told is most effective by the media and movies than what is actually most effective.
maybe so, but they are the guns of choice, and, as a byproduct of that choice, the guns we need to look at restricting from falling into just anyone's hands... again, i'm not for banning these weapons...
if shotguns were to be the gun of choice, then we can address those then... would be much harder to make an argument to ban those, i concede, and i actually would probably be very opposed to making them any more restricted, to be honest....
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:28 am to chRxis
quote:
maybe so, but they are the guns of choice, and, as a byproduct of that choice, the guns we need to look at restricting from falling into just anyone's hands.
No. You’re trying to limit every single gun type except muzzle loaders and crack barrels by your own definition.
Why won’t you dive into the minutiae?
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:29 am to chRxis
quote:
maybe so, but they are the guns of choice, and, as a byproduct of that choice, the guns we need to look at restricting from falling into just anyone's hands... again, i'm not for banning these weapons...
What about Virginia Tech, sure wasn't the gun of choice.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:29 am to Centinel
quote:
An ex going to the police and making shite up.
Pissing a dickhead cop off.
Pissing off a doctor, or pissing off someone who has a doctor friend.
I can keep going. All will result in the loss of my firearms.
which is why i said panel... wouldn't be just one person... you'd have to have a lot of collusion going against you for a few independent practitioners to vote against you...
and any fraud by said practitioners, either going for or against the potential gun owner, would be dealt with swiftly and harshly... fines, loss of license, restitution to society, jail, etc...
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:29 am to chRxis
quote:
maybe so, but they are the guns of choice, and, as a byproduct of that choice, the guns we need to look at restricting from falling into just anyone's hands.
Read this again. Then again. Then again.
Your logic is that we just keep banning weapons based on who is using them. What happens when we ban all firearms, and these people move on to using vehicles, bombs, etc.?
You know why your logic fails again and again?
Because you're addressing the tool, not the problem.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:30 am to DemonKA3268
quote:
What about Virginia Tech, sure wasn't the gun of choice.
again, re-read... i said handguns would be included....
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:30 am to chRxis
Dude you should seriously learn about firearms. Your ignorance is glaring.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:31 am to chRxis
quote:
which is why i said panel
What mental illnesses?
What’s the appeals process?
How long?
Is there an inherit bias against or for guns in the group in power?
Is this going to be abused?
quote:
you'd have to have a lot of collusion going against you for a few independent practitioners to vote against you...
Not at all. One phone call and the cops come and take your guns, then it’s on YOU to prove that you’re capable to get them back. That’s how red flag laws work, hoss.
quote:
and any fraud by said practitioners, either going for or against the potential gun owner, would be dealt with swiftly and harshly... fines, loss of license, restitution to society, jail, etc...
Awww that’s cuteeee.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:31 am to chRxis
quote:
which is why i said panel... wouldn't be just one person... you'd have to have a lot of collusion going against you for a few independent practitioners to vote against you...
And if you think that panel isn't going to support their peers, you're a naive fool.
I mean you see this every day already.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:33 am to chRxis
quote:
again, re-read... i said handguns would be included....
As in banning them?
Would this panel be able to use the same standard across the board to keep these "sketchy people" from getting these guns you are talking about?
This one size fits all assumption you have will never work.
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:37 am to Centinel
quote:
Your logic is that we just keep banning weapons based on who is using them. What happens when we ban all firearms, and these people move on to using vehicles, bombs, etc.?
the weapons will still be there... i'm not saying ban the weapons... i'm saying ban those deemed to be too dangerous or irresponsible from those weapons, if need be... big difference....
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:38 am to chRxis
quote:
i'm saying ban those deemed to be too dangerous or irresponsible from those weapons, if need be... big difference....
And yet....
You still won’t elaborate.
Why are you such an emotional pussy?
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:38 am to chRxis
quote:You have not even the faintest idea as how an AR-15 of AK-47 can be legally described without the description matching a myriad of other guns. We would lose over half of the guns on the market.
chRxis
Also, you can't describe an AR-15 to include all of the variants, some of them more dangerous than the standard AR.
This post was edited on 9/11/19 at 11:39 am
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:38 am to DemonKA3268
quote:
As in banning them?
no, as in restricting just anyone from having them... not everyone that can own a handgun, should own a handgun...
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:39 am to chRxis
quote:
What mental illnesses?
What’s the appeals process?
How long?
Is there an inherit bias against or for guns in the group in power?
Is this going to be abused?
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:40 am to beerJeep
quote:
Why are you such an emotional pussy?
easy keyboard ninja... really easy to type that out on the other side your computer screen, i understand...
Posted on 9/11/19 at 11:41 am to chRxis
quote:
What mental illnesses? What’s the appeals process? How long? Is there an inherit bias against or for guns in the group in power? Is this going to be abused?
This post was edited on 9/11/19 at 11:41 am
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News