Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Fishermen already teeing up the first lawsuit against the Barataria diversion.

Posted on 11/9/23 at 7:30 am
Posted by Slippy
Across the rivah
Member since Aug 2005
6578 posts
Posted on 11/9/23 at 7:30 am
Article in the Picayune this morning detailed how they’re going after it under the Endangered Species Act. This will just be the first of many.

frick this state and its backward arse lawsuit-loving population. This is why we can’t have nice things.

quote:

While many state leaders and environmental groups back the project, it’s clear the diversion will have wide-reaching effects on the Barataria region’s fishing communities. According to a Corps environmental assessment, the added sediment and freshwater “would likely have major, adverse impacts” on the basin’s oysters and brown shrimp. It would also harm populations of speckled trout and flounder, according to the Corps.


quote:

Last year, Jurisich said a lawsuit was the only way to halt the diversion. “It’s going to be litigation,” he said during a meeting of commercial fishers held in Belle Chasse in October 2022. “It’s the only way to stop this.”


https://www.nola.com/news/environment/oyster-harvesters-threaten-lawsuit-over-sediment-diversion/article_fc2c624c-7e82-11ee-bcd2-6b497f456f2c.html
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
21888 posts
Posted on 11/9/23 at 7:40 am to
quote:

how they’re going after it under the Endangered Species Act.
Claiming it’ll impact sea turtles. I’ve fished the marshes of Plaquemines Parish since I was a kid and I’ve never seen a sea turtle anywhere remotely close to where the diversion will be.

Guess they’d rather the land on the west side of the river to continue eroding away so that there is no more estuary for shrimp or juvenile fish to grow up in. It’ll all just be wide open water
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37080 posts
Posted on 11/9/23 at 8:38 am to
The truth is that coastal erosion actually helps the fishermen.

No wants to put it in those terms… but that is truth
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39922 posts
Posted on 11/9/23 at 8:43 am to
It won’t harm shite. It will move populations of oysters and fish and shrimp around a little bit, so fishermen will have to drive a little further or a little here, instead of there, in order to find them.

Everybody’s gotta sue out of some inconvenience.
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
16859 posts
Posted on 11/9/23 at 8:45 am to
Let's put the livelihoods of millions at risk from hurricanes and storm surge so some fisherman don't have to venture too far out.

frick this. Build the damn diversion and do it quickly.
Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
7816 posts
Posted on 11/9/23 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Claiming it’ll impact sea turtles.

Wouldn't the land (spawning grounds) disappearing also impact sea turtles?
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
14504 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 9:32 pm to
Bump because it seems like this entire project might be in trouble.

NOLA.com
Work stops again on Louisiana's biggest coastal restoration project. Is the $3B plan dead?

quote:

For a second time, Plaquemines Parish has ordered the state to halt construction on its largest-ever coastal restoration project.

And this time it might stick.

That’s because the state Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority on Monday decided not to fight a legal challenge the parish filed against the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion. On Monday, the CPRA announced it would not go to the state Supreme Court to appeal a court decision upholding the stop-work order the parish issued in November.



quote:

It's not clear whether the decision not to fight the order means Gov. Jeff Landry's new administration has decided to abandon the project. Administration officials did not respond to questions Wednesday. Officials with the CPRA have not responded to questions about the status of the diversion for weeks

quote:

While the diversion had strong backing from former Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards, the new administration of Landry, a Republican, is questioning the project and has been more receptive to its critics. Last week, newly appointed CPRA Chairman Gordy Dove cited the diversion’s recent legal troubles when announcing a comprehensive review of the diversion. They have not said how long the review might take

quote:

The first legal challenge, led by a group of Plaquemines oyster companies, came in November, a few weeks after Landry was elected with the support of Lt. Gov. Billy Nungesser, an opponent of the project who hails from Plaquemines Parish. Nungesser, a Republican, was an outspoken critic of Landry who was mulling a bid for governor before opting out and endorsing Landry last year


Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

Fishermen already teeing up the first lawsuit against the Barataria diversion


They are wasting their time and money
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
30248 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Nungesser, a Republican, was an outspoken critic of Landry who was mulling a bid for governor before opting out and endorsing Landry last year


fricking politics once again ruining a good thing for the state. Never change, Louisiana.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 11:07 pm to
You underestimate the baws with money
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

You underestimate the baws with money


No I don’t. The baws with money are for the diversion.

Incase you haven’t heard, no one likes Nungesser
This post was edited on 2/28/24 at 11:15 pm
Posted by DTRDude
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2023
42 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 11:14 pm to
The most intriguing part is all of this, is this is being done with fines from the BP Oil spill.
Posted by Seeing Grey
Member since Sep 2015
590 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 11:49 pm to
quote:

The truth is that coastal erosion actually helps the fishermen.

No wants to put it in those terms… but that is truth


Possibly in the short term, in the long term absolutely not
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
43700 posts
Posted on 2/28/24 at 11:51 pm to
Need to find a fricking way to sue the pogy boat operators under endangered species act. I would support ISIS over those mfers
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
8373 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 5:31 am to
quote:

Nungesser, a Republican, was an outspoken critic of Landry who was mulling a bid for governor before opting out and endorsing Landry last year


fricking politics once again ruining a good thing for the state. Never change, Louisiana.


With nungesser's backing, I may suspend my support of commercial fishing all together. I fricking hate nungesser's guts. He is everything that is wrong with this state and anyone that associates with him or he speaks for is subject to question.

The amount of short sightedness and lack of historical context on this project by the commercial fishermen is mind boggling.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29180 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 5:49 am to
Take a look at Landry’s campaign contributions, and note his dismantling of CPRA (also another finger in the eye to Garrett Graves). Anyone who thinks he is a business loving Republican didn’t pay attention to where he came from (Democratic Trial Lawyer), who he took money from, and who his appointments have been so far. He got a lot of mileage for going after Biden as AG, but even Stevie Wonder could see he’s the same sort of Republican as John Alario and Jay Dardenne, it was a matter of branding to get elected.

At least the 26 year old young lady from South Dakota he appointed to head up WLF will have her lifetime of knowledge of Louisiana’s estuaries and fisheries to call on to weigh in on this.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21223 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 5:52 am to
quote:

Need to find a fricking way to sue the pogy boat operators under endangered species act.


This.

We’ll stop a project that would ADD LAND to our eroding coastline with the argument the project may harm endangered species and potentially nearby speck fishing, but the state’s politicians are too gutless to do anything about the pogie boats. We’re too scared to even just make them move another mile further from the coast for their operations.
Posted by CrazyTigerFan
Osaka
Member since Nov 2003
3275 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 5:55 am to
I've put up with a lot of bullshite in this state to stay here because of family. This will be the thing that pushes me out. Even with the diversions there's a risk, but without the marshlands there's no hope.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29180 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 6:13 am to
Gutless? They have the stomach to take piles of money from the foreign interests that own the pogy operations.

Politicians everywhere are on the take, ours just embrace it rather than trying to hide it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram