- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FBI officially Investigating California shooting as a act of terrorism
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:43 am to Hog on the Hill
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:43 am to Hog on the Hill
quote:
God forbid a news network bring in people with different opinions and let them all talk about their perspectives on the breaking news, especially when everyone is short on facts.
You folks will bitch about the most trivial things
When you bring a guy on and he states... "This looks like terr... " and is cut off before he finishes and the commentator states that mental health and the workplace are more inline with the events, then you arent really allowing all angles to be covered. I had no problem with all avenues being explored but it became obvious that they were pushing terrorism to the spot reserved for the family dog.
This post was edited on 12/3/15 at 11:46 am
1
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:44 am to Hog on the Hill
There's actually no question whether it was workplace violence or not. It WAS. That is a factually accurate description of what it was. It was also islamic terrorism. Why is this so hard for some to grasp? I have never seen people melt so hard over simple semantics.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:44 am to TROLA
quote:
When you bring a guy on and he states... "This looks like terr... " and is cut off before he finishes
not once..not twice...not 3 times...multiple times yesterday.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:45 am to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
There's actually no question whether it was workplace violence or not. It WAS. That is a factually accurate description of what it was.
was the EoDM massacre listed as "musical concert violence"?
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:45 am to CAD703X
Nvm not wearing bullet proof vests. Just tactical.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:46 am to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
I have never seen people melt so hard over simple semantics.
Because bullshite semantics somehow made Boston, Fort Hood and Chattanooga NOT terrorism, when they all clearly were - Islamic terrorism that the President refuses to even accept exists.
That's why. This is Islamic terrorism, either directed, coordinated or inspired by AQ or ISIS - their target criteria is of no importance to me.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:46 am to upgrayedd
quote:
What a stupid fricking direction to take that argument.
Like someone else mentioned, nearly all the other networks are reporting the facts more quickly, accurately, and at least appear to hide their agenda much better.
CNN's agenda was obvious last night. Daytime crew seems to much better...but I'm not going to depend on CNN anymore for facts in a major event like this. During the incidents in Lafayette, Paris, and California, they allocated a huge amount of air time on very one-sided gun control debates within a few hours of the story breaking. Their agenda is obvious and their reporting is irresponsible.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:47 am to CAD703X
quote:
was the EoDM massacre listed as "musical concert violence"?
no but "theater shooting," which it was. Stop whining about meaningless semantics.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:47 am to Ace Midnight
Had 1600 rounds with them in the vehicle
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:48 am to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
There's actually no question whether it was workplace violence or not. It WAS. That is a factually accurate description of what it was. It was also islamic terrorism. Why is this so hard for some to grasp? I have never seen people melt so hard over simple semantics.
Sure. It was certainly WORKPLACE VIOLENCE/islamic terrorism.
For brevity, let's just shorten the phrase to Workplace violence/it.
Definitely no agenda with a dual label.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:48 am to Hog on the Hill
quote:
CNN was seriously discussing it as a possible,
Not really, it was dominated by the Blond pyscho and the shrink.
This morning, their reporter (not commenter) lambasted Ted Cruz for criticizing the administration before knowing the facts (although Cruz's commentary was 24 hours after the administrations). Yet no comment that the administration waiting a whopping hour might have been a touch early.
Ridiculous bias in all this. They were my go to for elections and these events, but they have been terrible in their gymnastics trying to get away from the elephant in the room
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:48 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Boston
misguided brother
quote:
Fort Hood
angry mentally ill employee
quote:
Chattanooga
lone wolf 'introvert'
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:48 am to tigerskin
12 pipe bombs in the house. I think around 7000 additional rounds of ammo at the house
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:48 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Because bull shite semantics somehow made Boston, Fort Hood and Chattanooga NOT terrorism, when they all clearly were - Islamic terrorism that the President refuses to even accept exists.
I think most people realize those were terrorism. Whoever says they weren't is wrong. Fort Hood was like this incident that was an act of terrorism perpetrated on the workplace. The other two are just cut and dry terrorism. Anyone who would argue otherwise is just a retard.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:49 am to tigerskin
3 pipe bombs attached together with a remote control car apparently didn't work
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:50 am to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
no but "theater shooting," which it was. Stop whining about meaningless semantics.
ok chief, this didn't happen at work. it was a party at an event center.
so why not 'event center shooting'?
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:50 am to Hog on the Hill
quote:
God forbid a news network bring in people with different opinions and let them all talk about their perspectives on the breaking news, especially when everyone is short on facts.
well there is truth that when it's possibly a white, male, "right wing" person, they rush to that narrative. we JUST had that example
quote:
You folks will bitch about the most trivial things
it's not trivial when they are legitimately pushing memes in order for those memes to become bigger
it's also not trivial when these memes magically align with one of the political parties
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:51 am to dewster
Well, CNN has it plastered across their front page now that there is a link to terrorists.
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:52 am to CAD703X
But Clochmed was definitely just a brilliant kid who "invented" a new kind of clock he was just so eager to show off after being told not to.
Definitely not a probe by an Islamic radical to test the waters
Definitely not a probe by an Islamic radical to test the waters
Posted on 12/3/15 at 11:52 am to Hog on the Hill
quote:
quote:
all i saw for an HOUR leading up to CAIR was that blonde bimbo citing with 100% certainty it was a workplace violence/easy access to guns/mental health issue.
Were you drinking? Because they had several guest experts on speculating that it was terrorism and they cited several reasons for believing so. The experts included former police detectives and profilers.
I'll have to agree with him on that one particular lady. She was zoned in on the "run of the mill workplace violence" narrative. I believe she even mentioned that he was likely set off by the Christmas party as being offensive to his religion.
Page 162 of 212
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News