Started By
Message

re: Fauci Funded Wuhan Lab and sent researchers to make coronavirus pandemic friendly.

Posted on 4/29/20 at 6:00 am to
Posted by Asharad
Tiamat
Member since Dec 2010
6301 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 6:00 am to
Buncha jackasses in here. Read the link.
Posted by Jinglebob
Member since Jan 2020
948 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 6:05 am to
No surprise the OT is down voting this.

99% they were too lazy to read or stupid to comprehend.

100% Karens
Posted by WITCH DOCTOR
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2009
3474 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 7:00 am to
They cant read that's the problem...
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
58519 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 7:02 am to
This is what happens when you put someone with a Muslim sounding name in the government. Terrorism
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
52942 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 7:03 am to
quote:

It’s like 5 million dollars which is nothing for a government grant. Think on how much Hunter Biden and the companies that employed him for example. They got way more money than this.

EDIT: it was lower. 3.7 million dollars over 6 years. Sorry, not enough to raise an eyebrow. I’m not even sure if Fauci was aware of it. That shouldn’t happen, but child’s play in government spending.



So it would have been ok if we were funding the Holocaust "just a little bit"

What do you think they pay those Chinamen to mess with test tubes, that's a lot of money in China
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12662 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 7:05 am to
quote:

Buncha jackasses in here. Read the link.

quote:

Nevertheless, in 2014, under pressure from the Obama administration, the National of Institutes of Health instituted a moratorium on the work, suspending 21 studies.

Three years later, though—in December 2017—the NIH ended the moratorium and the second phase of the NIAID project, which included the gain-of-function research, began.

Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
106274 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 7:11 am to
Yeah, I was curious when funding came back again. We covered Gain-of-Function ethics in a research methods class I had and the government funding was virtually impossible to get at the time (under Obama).

quote:

Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to (and/or, perhaps, actually does) increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens. Such research, when conducted by responsible scientists, usually aims to improve understanding of disease causing agents, their interaction with human hosts, and/or their potential to cause pandemics. The ultimate objective of such research is to better inform public health and preparedness efforts and/or development of medical countermeasures. Despite these important potential benefits, GOF research (GOFR) can pose risks regarding biosecurity and biosafety. In 2014 the administration of US President Barack Obama called for a “pause” on funding (and relevant research with existing US Government funding) of GOF experiments involving influenza, SARS, and MERS viruses in particular.


Knowing the controversy over Gain-of-Function research, it doesn't surprise me that we (US Government) would fund it in a lab in somewhere like China as to try to reduce the risk of it coming here if it made it out of a lab.

Ethics of Gain of Function Research
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
73253 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 7:16 am to
If this was a weapon, it would have a higher than 1%-3% kill rate. Just saying.

You don't make a weapon that only works 1 out of 100 times.

Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
23204 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 7:17 am to
quote:

Not sure why the downvotes are raining down.


The OT is filled with Fauci fanboys.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
106274 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 7:20 am to
quote:

If this was a weapon, it would have a higher than 1%-3% kill rate. Just saying.

You don't make a weapon that only works 1 out of 100 times.


Yeah, I don't buy the China was making biological weapons and it leaked theory. I would think something closer to something like Ebola would be far more effective as a biological weapon.

I'd have no problem believing that they were doing Gain-of-Function research and there was a breech. That makes a ton more sense.
Posted by Capt ST
High Plains
Member since Aug 2011
13500 posts
Posted on 4/29/20 at 7:32 am to
quote:

You don't make a weapon that only works 1 out of 100 times.


There’s always a problem with them. Needs a little tweaking to make it a little more virulent and not just get rid of the obese, chronically ill and the elderly.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram