Started By
Message

re: ExxonMobil withdraws ITEP requests, future Baton Rouge expansion in question

Posted on 1/23/19 at 11:17 am to
Posted by Buryl
Member since Sep 2016
1018 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 11:17 am to
So we're all in agreement that welfare is bad, unless it's corporate welfare, in which case it's good.

Just trying to keep up.
Posted by topdollarbill
Shenandoah, LA
Member since Mar 2013
211 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 11:18 am to
quote:

We can certainly agree on that


Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
61251 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 11:19 am to
That’s a lame arse argument
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
76485 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 11:28 am to
quote:

So we're all in agreement that welfare is bad, unless it's corporate welfare, in which case it's good.

Ah, one of the many people who believe that a reduction in taxes is actually the government giving away money.

Posted by WildManGoose
Member since Nov 2005
4599 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 11:36 am to
If you want a balance sheet: Exxon puts ~$5,000,000/yr into EBR outreach. EBR denied Exxon a $290,000/yr tax exemption.

So it looks like EBR stands to lose $4,710,000 if Exxon so decides. Do you think the parish will earmark to fill that gap?

Exxon is really steam rolling this parish
Posted by Buryl
Member since Sep 2016
1018 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 11:59 am to
Not really an argument, more of a criticism/observation of the general attitude on this forum.



Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
31719 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 12:04 pm to
Scruffy gets it
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
40170 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Ah, one of the many people who believe that a reduction in taxes is actually the government giving away money.


The government should be as small as possible and only collect the minimum needed to run that small government.

The problem is when exemptions are not handed out in a fair, rational, and above-board manner.

The best tax systems have no exemptions whatsoever, and low tax rates for everyone.

What makes more sense, from a predicibility and stability standpoint?

1) Charging 10 million in taxes, but the company has to go spend time and effort to get an exemption that lowers their tax bill to 1 million.

2) Just charge 1 million in taxes and be done with it.
Posted by topdollarbill
Shenandoah, LA
Member since Mar 2013
211 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 12:18 pm to
All this ^^^^^^^
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34200 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Icansee4miles


Have you talked to LSUDad about his thoughts regarding this latest step by ITEP?
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
72827 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 12:32 pm to
lol. The argument of the functionally retarded.
Posted by JasonL79
Houston area
Member since Jan 2010
6424 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

The government should be as small as possible and only collect the minimum needed to run that small government. The problem is when exemptions are not handed out in a fair, rational, and above-board manner. The best tax systems have no exemptions whatsoever, and low tax rates for everyone. What makes more sense, from a predicibility and stability standpoint? 1) Charging 10 million in taxes, but the company has to go spend time and effort to get an exemption that lowers their tax bill to 1 million. 2) Just charge 1 million in taxes and be done with it.


Trying to explain that to government bureaucrats won't be so easy. I guarantee you Baton Rouge's tax codes are not that simple.
Posted by JasonL79
Houston area
Member since Jan 2010
6424 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Ah, one of the many people who believe that a reduction in taxes is actually the government giving away money.


I bet 95+% who are against these tax breaks think the government is paying these companies this money.

I work in the industrial capital project world and run into this opinions from time to time when I explain what I do to people.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
31719 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Mudminnow


You know I have. I told him I miss his posts, he says he’s really happy to be retired.
Posted by WildManGoose
Member since Nov 2005
4599 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

1) Charging 10 million in taxes, but the company has to go spend time and effort to get an exemption that lowers their tax bill to 1 million.


This gives local government more control over which industries they attract and the power to reward businesses that contribute more to the local economy.

quote:

2) Just charge 1 million in taxes and be done with it.


This does not. It also causes the property tax burden to be shifted to residential to make up for the industrial shortfall.
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34200 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 12:45 pm to
quote:


You know I have. I told him I miss his posts, he says he’s really happy to be retired


Seems to enjoy living in TX and spending time with the grandchildren vs. working. I thought he may get bored and want to work again but I guess he hasn't gotten that bored yet.
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

FWIW, Broderick Baggert (of TBR fame) has a Masters degree from London School of Economics. Does that make him an expert too?



His Master's degree is in "Social Policy".
Posted by jglass3lsu
Member since Jan 2007
885 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 12:54 pm to
Most don’t even appreciate that LA residential properties are assessed at 10% of their fair market value and also receive a homestead exemption. Commercial/industrial improvements and personal property are assessed at 15%.

Here’s a little math example of how that works out:

HOMEOWNER
Home Market Value: $200,000
Homestead Exemption: $75,000
Taxable Market Value: $125,000
Assessment Ratio: 10%
Assessed Value: $12,500
Mill Rate: 20mills (EST.)
Tax Due: $250

EXXON (Or any other business)
Improvement Market Value: $200,000
Exemption: $0
Assessment Ratio: 15%
Assessed Value: $30,000
Mill Rate: 20mills (EST.)
Tax Due: $600

Before you start making noise about government giveaways to business, realize that LA’s property tax system is already set up wildly in favor of residential property owners.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
40170 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Trying to explain that to government bureaucrats won't be so easy. I guarantee you Baton Rouge's tax codes are not that simple.


Given the idiots we have in charge, is even more of a reason to push for a simplified tax code.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
40170 posts
Posted on 1/23/19 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

This gives local government more control over which industries they attract and the power to reward businesses that contribute more to the local economy.


So, does this mean you support JBE changing the system and giving local governments control over approving or denying the exemption? Because up until this past summer, the local government had no control at all over this.

quote:

This does not. It also causes the property tax burden to be shifted to residential to make up for the industrial shortfall.


Explain to me what you mean.

What is the difference between charging a refinery a million dollar tax, and charging a refinery a 10 million dollar tax with a 9 million dollar exemption? In both instances, the government is collecting 1 million from the refinery. There is no shortfall.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram