Started By
Message

re: EV owners are going to pay the piper in TX.

Posted on 5/21/23 at 11:16 pm to
Posted by BeepNode
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2014
10005 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

No, they need to be paying a grid upgrade fee,


You realize they are paying customers, right? What are energy companies doing with the money they get from selling electricity, if not using it to provide it?

In addition to that, EVs can, in theory, help store and distribute power during emergencies.

Jesus Christ, y'all are some dummies.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32394 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 11:30 pm to
quote:

More of a Stripes taco guy?


I don’t have a dog in this fight but stripes breakfast tacos are legit and shouldn’t be besmirched in this conversation.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
12703 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 6:29 am to
A simple solution is to tax electricity used at Superchargers and charging stations like you tax gas. 2-5 cents per kilowatt hour. The feds should get in on it too, 2-5 cents per kilowatt hour, you can even say it is to recapture the EV tax credits people get when they buy an EV.

Also, you can require EV home chargers to have their own electrical meters or have circuitry to differentiate EV charging and home power needs so the electricity usage at home can be taxed there too.
This post was edited on 5/22/23 at 6:48 am
Posted by Will Cover
Davidson, NC
Member since Mar 2007
40219 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 7:02 am to
quote:

A Montana LLC costs $800. Seems more reasonable every year


quote:

Thought they got rid of that loophole


Maybe in Texas. I don't know.

But it's alive and well elsewhere.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 7:03 am to
It should be in line with gasoline taxes.
Posted by Wraytex
San Antonio - Gonzales
Member since Jun 2020
4020 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 7:20 am to
"Jesus Christ, y'all are some dummies." You wear the shoe well considering your theory was not in place in the freeze of 21, which makes the point valid. Pay your fair share pinko.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18061 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 8:19 am to
quote:

Pay your fair share pinko.

Maybe this isn't a fair share.

Example:
My GX gets call it 18mpg combined. At .20/G I'm taxed at .01 per mile.

My wife drives her Model 3 5000 miles a year. She's now taxed at .04 per mile.

That 4X isn't fair. And it's because they were too lazy to do something that is fair and just passed through whatever they felt like.
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6653 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 8:33 am to
Seems similar to the gas tax over a year's period.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29105 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 8:40 am to
quote:

A simple solution is to tax electricity used at Superchargers and charging stations
That will only cover maybe 20% of EV charging.
quote:

Also, you can require EV home chargers to have their own electrical meters or have circuitry to differentiate EV charging and home power needs so the electricity usage at home can be taxed there too.
Nope. No way in hell will I allow government into my home to peek at what I'm using electricity for.

Neither gas taxes nor electricity taxes are all that great at doing what they're intended to do anyway, which is align road use (damage/destruction/"consumption") with taxes paid. We either need tolls everywhere or let's take odo readings during inspection and multiply by vehicle weight on a log scale.
Posted by BeepNode
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2014
10005 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 1:25 pm to
A lot of big government conservatives up in here.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26134 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 1:34 pm to
Only the government can tax you to use roads that you also paid taxes to build and maintain. Then, when you don't use the fuel source they are currently taxing for this purpose, they tax the fuel service you have moved to but do not relieve any of the other tax burdens associated with that source. So, EV owners now get double taxed, instead of just re-apportioning tax proceeds from the sale of electricity.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12846 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

That 4X isn't fair. And it's because they were too lazy to do something that is fair and just passed through whatever they felt like.

I think you’re seeing a combination of two factors:

1. Many states’ gas taxes are already antiquated and unable to keep up with inflation.

2. Very few people (among state governments or drivers) actually want to implement a usage-based road tax for EV’s.

I’ll address the second point first - if we all truly wanted a fair way to tax EV usage, that would mean either taxing per mile driven (meaning you would have to report odometer mileage regularly and the state would have to enforce it) or taxing per kWh used for EV charging (meaning more reporting/monitoring of home power usage).

I think we probably see things shift to a mileage-based tax in the long term, but that’s not going to be popular if we are being honest. Nobody wants to report more to the government and the government doesn’t want the administrative burden of having to manage it.

To the first point: I don’t know about Texas, but in Louisiana the gas tax is only worth about 43% of its original value the last time it was increased (1990). Everyone knows the gas tax is a massive part of our issues funding highway projects/maintenance, but there is no political will to increase it.

I bring this up because I’d be shocked if this didn’t play into the thinking on EV taxes at least to some extent. The states probably know that increasing any flat tax to match inflation will be incredibly difficult, so they’re going to aim high while EV adoption is still in its infancy. It would not be wise of them, long term, to match a gas tax that is already inadequate and out of date.

That doesn’t make it right, but I think it’s just reality.
This post was edited on 5/22/23 at 6:12 pm
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
139421 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 5:27 pm to
Evs are heavier, harder on the roads. Then there are the landfills to consider
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18061 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

That doesn’t make it right, but I think it’s just reality.

Yeah i really don't car and agree with both of those points but it's still just a lazy approach to me. Which is right on cue for politicians.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18061 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

Evs are heavier, harder on the roads.

so my GX that's over 1000lbs heavier should be taxed at 25% of the lighter EV. This is such an asinine point. If you're really worried about weight then we should be hitting every soccer mom mobile and F150+ for higher fees.
quote:

Then there are the landfills to consider

Batteries aren't going to landfills. This is an equally stupid point. You have to stop believing what you read on FaceBook.
This post was edited on 5/22/23 at 5:53 pm
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
10935 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 7:02 pm to
Sooo... they'll pay their FAIR SHARE of road upkeep?

Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
75137 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

let's take odo readings during inspection and multiply by vehicle weight on a log scale.

Some states don't even have inspections, though. Gonna have to sink even more money into more government agencies to go that route.
This post was edited on 5/22/23 at 7:30 pm
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
18061 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

Sooo... they'll pay their FAIR SHARE of road upkeep?

They could be paying more than their fair share though. At that’s why this is stupid and a lazy solution.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29105 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Some states don't even have inspections, though. Gonna have to sink even more money into more government agencies to go that route.
Seems the revenue should cover it.

I'm all ears for more/better suggestions. I'll discuss a GoFundMe style of funding for roads and other infrastructure. Show me what we'll get and what it costs. Tell me my share. Do some studies. Show me the benefits or the cost of *not* funding the project. Campaign for your pet project. Give me some stretch goals.
Posted by GerseyCX
Member since Sep 2022
75 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 8:49 pm to
They should tax ICE cars for being slow and in way of EVs.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram