Started By
Message

re: Emergency meeting scheduled to go over online learning and future calendar

Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:32 am to
Posted by NolaTiger52
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2018
1868 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:32 am to
It’s overblown, but it’s really not that hard to understand. If you’re kids get sick... and then hang around their grandparents who are in their 80’s... then it’s not looking good for Gramps. The idea isn’t to keep you from dying, but someone else with a compromised immune system.
Posted by notbilly
alter
Member since Sep 2015
4778 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:32 am to
quote:

There was never this kind of response to any other possible pandemic. Why now?

Ebola caused 2 deaths in the US. Do you not remember the freak out from that? People were wanting American doctors kept from returning home. We never got to shutdowns because it never spread but it caused a lot of fear mongering despite only two deaths.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89618 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:35 am to
COVID19 may end brick and mortar instruction as we know it, particularly university level work. Most college baws (students and professors) are already scared of their own shadows. This must drive them to their doctor's office for Xanax refills like nobody's business.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48329 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Thats how they sell you on socialism/communism

Pretty much the exact same wording


Get the frick out of here with that bullshite.
Posted by SaintsandTigers
Member since Feb 2020
461 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Get the frick out of here with that bull shite.
You are so blinded it isnt funny

You are telling people to have their daily lives altered and give up what they enjoy doing for "the good of the community"

An extra $500 dollars out of your paycheck would also help the community

The govt taking your possessions and distributing to others more in need would also help the community

There is no difference.
This post was edited on 3/10/20 at 10:41 am
Posted by Freight Joker
Member since Aug 2019
2787 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Do you not have anyone elderly in your family?


My wheelchair-bound grandmother is afraid of purchasing anything from China for fear of catching the Corona.

She spends her days sharing news stories on Facebook and not going outside.

I hope the fear mongers are happy.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
18468 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:46 am to
quote:

My wheelchair-bound grandmother is afraid of purchasing anything from China for fear of catching the Corona.



My wife threw away some packaged food the other day because it was from China. I laughed.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72189 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:47 am to
quote:

He re-assigned Tim Ziemer and pressured Tom Bossert to resign, both of whom had pandemic response under their umbrella in their respective roles.
I will give you that.

And they both left with Jon Bolton’s restructuring.

We would benefit from both of them.

As for your budgetary argument, you are flatout wrong.

Here is the US’s budgetary allocation to its global health initiative.



This administration has given the average amount and the $1 billion spike you see is a one time event during Ebola.

It was never meant to be long term.

The average funding for the US global health initiative has been anywhere from $300-500 million on average.

The $1 billion was from an emergency fund.

If you want to argue that we should continue emergency funding in perpetuity, go right ahead, but that is the definition of hindsight.

If you want to read everything about the US global health initiative and its funding, check out the link below.

LINK
This post was edited on 3/10/20 at 10:48 am
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48329 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:47 am to
quote:

COVID19 may end brick and mortar instruction as we know it, particularly university level work. Most college baws (students and professors) are already scared of their own shadows. This must drive them to their doctor's office for Xanax refills like nobody's business.


I think its more likely to show how antiquated physical classes are.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11971 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:48 am to
quote:

The major concern is NOT that the young who contract it will die. The concern is that millions of young will contract it, fight off their cold after a week or so, and will spread it to elderly family and acquaintances - who WILL be at a much higher risk of dying from it than the less deadly (from a fatality rate standpoint) flu.

Why people can’t figure this out is beyond me. I guess everyone is self-centered and assume just because their personal risk of contracting it and dying from it is low that everything is all good. The idea behind these plans is to SLOW the SPREAD of the virus.

Do we know if it is any more deadly than the flu? By admission, the experts have said there may be many more cases out there that are never diagnosed because the symptoms are similar to the cold/flu. So, the mortality rate is assumed higher because of the much smaller population of documented cases. There must be a whole lot more to this virus than is being shared as the response seems much more hightened than would be expected.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99152 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:49 am to
quote:

The average age of death by the virus is 81.4.


C'mon man! I can't even begin to count the number of 80+ year olds roaming LSU's campus.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:49 am to
quote:

As for your budgetary argument, you are flatout wrong.


I never made a budgetary argument, other than pointing out that the 5-year CDC funding for global pandemic research that was a result of the Ebola outbreak wasn't extended.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72189 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:51 am to
quote:

5-year CDC funding for global pandemic research that was a result of the Ebola outbreak wasn't extended.
It was $1 billion in emergency funding due to Ebola.

Are you arguing that we should continue that in perpetuity?

Should the CDC’s budget have been permanently increased by nearly 200%?

I am not saying I disagree with that, but that is nothing but hindsight.
This post was edited on 3/10/20 at 10:55 am
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11971 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:52 am to
quote:

office workers working from home and kids doing school online isn’t shutting everything down tho
Have you been following the news? Sporting events are starting to shut out fans and/or media, large parades and festivals are cancelling events, people are being encouraged not to cruise, etc. It is more than asking a few people to work from home.
Posted by TigerChief10
Member since Dec 2012
10858 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:53 am to
quote:

office workers working from home and kids doing school online isn’t shutting everything down tho

yes it is. No matter how many of your bullshite studies you want to post productivity is greater when youre actually at work and not home
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48329 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:53 am to
quote:

You are so blinded it isnt funny

You are telling people to have their daily lives altered and give up what they enjoy doing for "the good of the community"

An extra $500 dollars out of your paycheck would also help the community

The govt taking your possessions and distributing to others more in need would also help the community

There is no difference.


Yeah, there is no difference between taking incredibly temporary measures to reduce the community spread of a novel virus versus having the government seize the means of production and distribution of industry . . .

Some of you people need to take a basic course in political structures.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89618 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:54 am to
quote:

I think its more likely to show how antiquated physical classes are.


Oh, I completely agree, but we won't get there with that thinking. We will get there because typical college students want an extra 2-weeks of Spring Break (during which time they will most decidedly not be social distancing) and university professors want to work from home.

It is only a matter of time before the bean counters say, "Hey - that wasn't so bad. You guys know how much we saved by physically closing and having all online classes for 2 weeks?"

And then all those Socialist administrators will get capitalist AF for a couple of minutes.
Posted by SaintsandTigers
Member since Feb 2020
461 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Yeah, there is no difference between taking incredibly temporary measures to reduce the community spread of a novel virus versus having the government seize the means of production and distribution of industry . . .

Some of you people need to take a basic course in political structures.
I am just trying to find where "your good of the community" altruism ends
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
One State Solution
Member since May 2012
55845 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Sporting events are starting to shut out fans and/or media, large parades and festivals are cancelling events, people are being encouraged not to cruise, etc. It is more than asking a few people to work from home.

that’s obviously not what I’m talking about
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Most college baws

Those ain't baws
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram