Started By
Message

re: Elon looking to take out Wikipedia with Grokipedia

Posted on 9/30/25 at 7:49 pm to
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
72718 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 7:49 pm to
i’d sit this one out little fella
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62138 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Reminder that Elon Musk is a foreign degenerate trans-humanist freak


Found one of the Wikipedia admins.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
12406 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

Found one of the Wikipedia admins.


Posted by CXSteve
Member since Oct 2012
891 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:15 pm to
He going to make up a bunch of fake BS for his oligarchy billionaire friends on Grokipedia just like he did with all that DOGE nonsense he posted without any proof
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
62138 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

He going to make up a bunch of fake BS for his oligarchy billionaire friends on Grokipedia just like he did with all that DOGE nonsense he posted without any proof


Who knew we had so many Wikipedia admins posting here on TD?
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
72718 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:21 pm to
your post history
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
31368 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:23 pm to
He could surprise me, but I think he’s going to lose on this one.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9314 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

What's the problem with Wikipedia? The math articles rule

Anything that can be political is leftist, and it propagates trans & alphabet propaganda. Trans are allowed to change or hide their history unlike anyone else on Wiki. Very large or extremely active group of Trans editors. Mentally disturbed and mentally ill individuals are controlling how our history and their mental illness are being documented on Wikipedia. One of the founders states it is no longer neutral and has become left wing dominated.

They actually had people trying to stop Erika Kirk’s profile with a debate and voting until the memorial and he official announcement taking over Turning Point pushed enough votes to stop the attempt.

Where else would the “non-binary” writer of a horrible trans Netflix series about a trans cop seduced by "heteronormative masculinity” be constantly in the top articles.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

I just watched this with the BF and the sex scene is hilarious, we were like what the frick are they doing ???? not to mention the topless scenes with the burger nips ??

quote:

She cut her breasts off, which still doesn’t make her a man. She’s a beautiful woman. So very sad she’s rejecting her sex, likely due to trauma.

quote:

I 100% thought they were a lesbian couple and was confused when something was said about her being the father of the child.

When I realized she believed she was a man, I was even more confused about how she was the father of the child.

I quit watching.
quote:

It’s funny how ‘heteronormativity’ is used as a slur. Like how are civilisations going to endure if being attracted to the opposite sex isn’t the norm?


https://twitchy.com/brettt/2025/09/29/graham-linehan-amused-by-netflixs-trans-cop-on-wayward-n2419706

I have a feeling the below helped motivate Musk to compete again against the left’s narrative being written and pushed.
quote:

Conservatives are canceling their Netflix accounts after finding out a children’s cartoon on the entertainment platform is pushing transgender ideology by featuring a trans character. Even Elon Musk has cancelled his subscription. The producer of Dead End: Paranormal Park goes by he/they pronouns and also referred to Charlie Kirk as a Nazi when he was assassinated. The show is advertised for seven-year-olds.
https://twitchy.com/warren-squire/2025/09/30/musk-cancels-netflix-transgender-kid-show-creator-celebrated-charlie-kirk-assassination-n2419743
This post was edited on 9/30/25 at 8:47 pm
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
24306 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

you can edit it.

Contrary to popular belief, it’s not that easy edit.

Especially if it’s a popular page. They’re extremely strict on what gets edited.

If it’s a less known topic, it is easy to edit but that brings up another problem. Which is people’s “sources” can be random shite that probably won’t get checked
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9314 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:44 pm to
Probably should buy britannica as a starting point and publish older print versions online as well.

Some existing alternatives to Wikipedia
https://www.britannica.com/
https://www.encyclopedia.com/
https://en.citizendium.org/
https://www.conservapedia.com/Main_Page

Only Britannica has any recognition.
Posted by F1y0n7h3W4LL
Below I-10
Member since Jul 2019
3482 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:47 pm to
I'll check it out.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
31690 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

edit. Especially if it’s a popular page. They’re extremely strict on what gets edited. If it’s a less known topic, it is easy to edit but that brings up another problem. Which is people’s “sources” can be random shite that probably won’t get checked


The co-founder said that a friend and media person(Democrat) called him and said that there was something blatantly false on his page that wasn’t even that negative and he called Wikipedia to correct the record with receipts and they said they don’t take primary or first hand sources.

Tim Pool (again, love him or hate him) had an article about building a mini-blimp equipped equipped with cameras to cover Occupy Wall Street and he contacted them to say “no I didn’t” they wouldn’t take his word for it.

Completely harmless and innocuous but they wouldn’t change it.


Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

Posted by Rainier Fog
Member since Jul 2025
321 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 10:34 pm to
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
52711 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

what articles have left leaning bias?


Literally most every one, you csnt be this obtuse
Posted by MSUDawg98
Ravens Flock
Member since Jan 2018
12293 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 10:56 pm to
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
9314 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

Strong left bias



The co-founder has stated this and that Wikipedia has strayed from it original goals of neutrality, and yet multiple people down vote this and other posts here stating the same thing like they know more than the co-founder.

The transwiki brownshirts have mobilized here on the OT.
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
24322 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

What's the problem with Wikipedia? The math articles rule


I’m ready for them to go away solely because they’re always begging me for fricking money.

Bring on the Grokisphere.
Posted by Tall Tiger
Golden Rectangle
Member since Sep 2007
4139 posts
Posted on 9/30/25 at 11:24 pm to
Read the whole Fox News entry on Wikipedia. It is insanely biased.
Posted by singittomenafogimp
Member since Sep 2025
319 posts
Posted on 10/1/25 at 1:28 am to
quote:

What's the problem with Wikipedia? The math articles rule


You serious? Most political articles are narrative manipulated editorials.
Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
10770 posts
Posted on 10/1/25 at 4:35 am to
quote:

What's the problem with Wikipedia? 

Uncyclopedia is generally a less biased and accurate source of important information, and they're a meme site.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram