- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOTD wants to close Washington street exit off of I-10 Bridge...
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:39 pm to TigerGman
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:39 pm to TigerGman
It's about fricking time. The dumbass truckers will still think they have to immediately cut in front of you as soon as they get off of the damn bridge though.
1
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:51 pm to Motorboat
Not just trucks, You have people who do not understand zipper merge. Then you have the jackasses who think we are all supposed to merge to one lane a mile before we need to. These are the same driving pros who then block the people trying to fill the other lane and do the zipper merge. So instead of a zipper merge with a half mile of traffic back up you have one lane of 2 mile back up.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:56 pm to Shexter
quote:
The ones opposing it are doing so because the I-10 bridge split their communities in half back
No white people had their homes taken by the interstate? I know a dozen families whose parents were displaced and went to St. Agnes Church - all white.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:07 pm to Loup
quote:
Bruh it's at least 3 times per week one of those frickers will pull in front of me
Then don’t leave a gap big enough for them to get in.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:11 pm to chryso
quote:
Then don’t leave a gap big enough for them to get in.
While this is true, I've had several instances where you DON'T actually have space for them and they just don't look or see you (or care?) and practically run you over trying to get left.
Good riddance to Washington St. exit. Hope they learn it's gone quickly and it clears things up a bit.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:14 pm to TigerGman
The amount of morons that are driving south from I-110 and bypass the new Washington street exit and completely frick up traffic to exit the original exit is mind boggling. Just this past Wednesday a fricking school bus did it, a couple of weeks ago a BRPD unit did it. I personally witnessed it right in front of me. That exit being open is one of the single most moronic things on that section of the interstate!!
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:43 pm to TigerGman
What’s stupid is only having one lane coming off the bridge for everyone to merge into. Should be two lanes coming off the bridge and nobody having to merge over.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:49 pm to Motorboat
quote:
immediately feel the need to merge to the middle lane.
If you’re coming from I-110 onto
I-10 say in the left lane and avoid as much of that chaos as possible
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:50 pm to sta4ever
The new Terrace Ave exit is open. No need for this Washington Street bullshite anymore.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:58 pm to WillieD
quote:
If you’re coming from I-110 onto I-10 say in the left lane and avoid as much of that chaos as possible
No. Too many slow driving people do that. Just stay in the right lane and make those frickers coming off the bridge stay in their lane.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:04 pm to andwesway
quote:
It's about fricking time. The dumbass truckers will still think they have to immediately cut in front of you as soon as they get off of the damn bridge though.
They said they “want to”. Don’t get your hopes up too high with these clucks.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:09 pm to sta4ever
quote:
No. Too many slow driving people do that. Just stay in the right lane and make those frickers coming off the bridge stay in their lane.
This
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:13 pm to TigerGman
Would it be sensible to drop I110 down to one lane before it merges with I10. Let I-10 remain two lanes and I110 would join it as a third (far left) lane?
This post was edited on 2/14/25 at 3:15 pm
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:16 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
Would it be sensible to drop I110 down to one lane before it merges with I10. Let I-10 remain two lanes and I110 would join it as a third (far left) lane?
Sensible…yes
Racist…yes
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:20 pm to sta4ever
quote:
No. Too many slow driving people do that. Just stay in the right lane and make those frickers coming off the bridge stay in their lane.
unless you are getting off at dalrymple idk why you would be in the right lane coming from 110
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:43 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
isn't that a racist issue.
Every time it’s suggested.
This is why we can’t have nice things.
It might be better to just start buying up all the houses between that exit and the river.
Paging BlackRock
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:48 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:This.
unless you are getting off at dalrymple idk why you would be in the right lane coming from 110
If you are not getting off at Washington st or dalrymple you should not be near the right lane right there
Posted on 2/14/25 at 4:02 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
unless you are getting off at dalrymple idk why you would be in the right lane coming from 110
The right lane at the 110/10 merge coming from the Governors curve, which then becomes the middle lane on 10. People who aren’t passing or driving fast, need to stay out of the left lane right there, and stay in the right lane (or eventual middle lane), and make the people coming from the bridge, stay in their lane, instead of cutting everyone off coming from 110 S.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 4:09 pm to TigerGman
I thought the entire fricking point of that new exit no one uses on 10-110S was so they could get rid of the Washington St exit.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News