Started By
Message

re: Does This Look Like The Face Of A Criminal To You?

Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:22 am to
Posted by GCTIDER
Mississippi
Member since May 2012
1893 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:22 am to
Had a black mouth cur that supposedly growled at one of my nieces.. Loved that dog, but wouldn't take the chance. He left my place that day.
Posted by 68wDoc68w
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2014
1869 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:23 am to
quote:

That doesn't answer my question still.


he gave you multiple dog laws how doesn't that answer your question
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89438 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Had a black mouth cur that supposedly growled at one of my nieces.. Loved that dog, but wouldn't take the chance. He left my place that day.


That's taking it a bit far
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89438 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:25 am to
quote:

he gave you multiple dog laws how doesn't that answer your question


No, they actually don't. So again, can you or anyone show an actual case where someone intentionally tormented a dog and was bitten, and the dog/owner were found at fault?
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Had a black mouth cur that supposedly growled at one of my nieces.. Loved that dog, but wouldn't take the chance. He left my place that day.



Your dog supposedly...growled...at one of your nieces and you got rid of the dog?

Wow, that's pretty ridiculous man.
Posted by Artie Rome
Hwy 1
Member since Jul 2014
8757 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:27 am to
quote:

I think most are missing the story .... the family doesn't want the dog put down, BUT

FL law states that if a dog bite cause stitches that it must be put down regardless of the situation.


You mean like abused wives that stay with shite-bag husbands? "He didn't mean it. I asked for it!"

See,s like a reasonable law.

We are talking about dogs, folks. What if it were cats?

Kill the cats!!!
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112628 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Honestly, it should be a non-story. The vet should separate animal from his customers, help with medical bills, and the family should be fine with that.
Have you and Lnch actually read the article? The family DOES NOT want the dog put down
This post was edited on 8/12/15 at 10:31 am
Posted by Artie Rome
Hwy 1
Member since Jul 2014
8757 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Have you and Lynch actually read the article? The family DOES NOT want the dog put down


Is it up to the family of a dad that beats his child as to whether the dad is prosecuted?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89438 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Have you and Lnch actually read the article?


Why are you asking if I read the article? I quoted it several times to people that clearly hadn't.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112628 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Is it up to the family of a dad that beats his child as to whether the dad is prosecuted?
Did I say that? Caterpillar and LNCH keep blaming the family for wanting the dog put down. That isnt the case here at all.
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:32 am to
Had a party at the house years ago.
Dog was a little nervous with all the people around.
Gf at the time got in his face knowing the dog was nervous and scared him like a dummy
Dig snapped and bit her face
Parents paid for the hospital bill and plastic surgery following
Homeowners insurance said kill the dog or get new insurance.
Girls face looked perfect.
364 days later parents sue my parents for pain and suffering
Yay.



Does this suffice your story needs?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89438 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Is it up to the family of a dad that beats his child as to whether the dad is prosecuted?


Anthony Jennings's prosecution (or lack there of) was affected by the "victim's" wishes.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:33 am to
quote:

LNCHBOX


quote:

Strict Liability Laws

Strict liability states do not follow the one-bite rule. In a strict liability state, a dog owner can be held liable for a victim's damages even if the dog has no history of injuring anyone, nor showed any tendency toward violence. Even if the owner properly leashes or otherwise controls the dog, in a strict liability state the dog owner is still liable.

Several exceptions apply to dog accident claims. Under these exceptions, whether negligent or not, a dog owner may escape liability for injuries his dog causes. The exceptions are when:

The victim was trespassing
The victim was purposely provoking the dog
The dog was a police, airport security, or military dog
The victim was a professional who deals with dogs, such as a veterinarian, dog trainer, etc.


So I guess it depends on what state you are in (strict liability vs. one-bite vs. other) and whether the courts rule a 4 year old can "intentionally" provoke a dog. Certainly the scenario where someone where to intentionally provoke a dog in order to sue, would not be liable.

Either way, I now know much more about dog bite statutes than I ever thought .....

ETA: Not sure what Florida law is on the subject.
This post was edited on 8/12/15 at 10:35 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112628 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Why are you asking if I read the article? I quoted it several times to people that clearly hadn't.
Well you seem to be insinuating the family is assholes for wanting the dog to be put down. And Caterpillar has directly said the family wants the dog put down, which is the opposite
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89438 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Caterpillar and LNCH keep blaming the family for wanting the dog put down.


What thread are you reading?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89438 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Well you seem to be insinuating the family is assholes for wanting the dog to be put down.


Do you just make things up?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112628 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:34 am to
quote:

What thread are you reading?
I aplogize if you havent. But Cat clearly has in here
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112628 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Does This Look Like The Face Of A Criminal To You? by LNCHBOXquote:Well you seem to be insinuating the family is assholes for wanting the dog to be put down. Do you just make things up?
Really? You dont think anywhere in here you have insinuated it is the families fault the dog may be put down?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89438 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Does this suffice your story needs?


It's close What a bitch.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89438 posts
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Really? You dont think anywhere in here you have insinuated it is the families fault the dog may be put down?


Link to it. Because I haven't.

ETA: See my post at the bottom of page two. I insinuate the lawyer wants to put a price on the dog's life, but I never said anything about the owners.
This post was edited on 8/12/15 at 10:37 am
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram