- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does This Look Like The Face Of A Criminal To You?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:22 am to Artie Rome
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:22 am to Artie Rome
Had a black mouth cur that supposedly growled at one of my nieces.. Loved that dog, but wouldn't take the chance. He left my place that day.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:23 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
That doesn't answer my question still.
he gave you multiple dog laws how doesn't that answer your question
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:23 am to GCTIDER
quote:
Had a black mouth cur that supposedly growled at one of my nieces.. Loved that dog, but wouldn't take the chance. He left my place that day.
That's taking it a bit far
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:25 am to 68wDoc68w
quote:
he gave you multiple dog laws how doesn't that answer your question
No, they actually don't. So again, can you or anyone show an actual case where someone intentionally tormented a dog and was bitten, and the dog/owner were found at fault?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:25 am to GCTIDER
quote:
Had a black mouth cur that supposedly growled at one of my nieces.. Loved that dog, but wouldn't take the chance. He left my place that day.
Your dog supposedly...growled...at one of your nieces and you got rid of the dog?
Wow, that's pretty ridiculous man.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:27 am to 68wDoc68w
quote:
I think most are missing the story .... the family doesn't want the dog put down, BUT
FL law states that if a dog bite cause stitches that it must be put down regardless of the situation.
You mean like abused wives that stay with shite-bag husbands? "He didn't mean it. I asked for it!"
See,s like a reasonable law.
We are talking about dogs, folks. What if it were cats?
Kill the cats!!!
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:29 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:Have you and Lnch actually read the article? The family DOES NOT want the dog put down
Honestly, it should be a non-story. The vet should separate animal from his customers, help with medical bills, and the family should be fine with that.
This post was edited on 8/12/15 at 10:31 am
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:30 am to lsupride87
quote:
Have you and Lynch actually read the article? The family DOES NOT want the dog put down
Is it up to the family of a dad that beats his child as to whether the dad is prosecuted?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:31 am to lsupride87
quote:
Have you and Lnch actually read the article?
Why are you asking if I read the article? I quoted it several times to people that clearly hadn't.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:32 am to Artie Rome
quote:Did I say that?
Is it up to the family of a dad that beats his child as to whether the dad is prosecuted?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:32 am to LNCHBOX
Had a party at the house years ago.
Dog was a little nervous with all the people around.
Gf at the time got in his face knowing the dog was nervous and scared him like a dummy
Dig snapped and bit her face
Parents paid for the hospital bill and plastic surgery following
Homeowners insurance said kill the dog or get new insurance.
Girls face looked perfect.
364 days later parents sue my parents for pain and suffering
Yay.
Does this suffice your story needs?
Dog was a little nervous with all the people around.
Gf at the time got in his face knowing the dog was nervous and scared him like a dummy
Dig snapped and bit her face
Parents paid for the hospital bill and plastic surgery following
Homeowners insurance said kill the dog or get new insurance.
Girls face looked perfect.
364 days later parents sue my parents for pain and suffering
Yay.
Does this suffice your story needs?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:32 am to Artie Rome
quote:
Is it up to the family of a dad that beats his child as to whether the dad is prosecuted?
Anthony Jennings's prosecution (or lack there of) was affected by the "victim's" wishes.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:33 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
LNCHBOX
quote:
Strict Liability Laws
Strict liability states do not follow the one-bite rule. In a strict liability state, a dog owner can be held liable for a victim's damages even if the dog has no history of injuring anyone, nor showed any tendency toward violence. Even if the owner properly leashes or otherwise controls the dog, in a strict liability state the dog owner is still liable.
Several exceptions apply to dog accident claims. Under these exceptions, whether negligent or not, a dog owner may escape liability for injuries his dog causes. The exceptions are when:
The victim was trespassing
The victim was purposely provoking the dog
The dog was a police, airport security, or military dog
The victim was a professional who deals with dogs, such as a veterinarian, dog trainer, etc.
So I guess it depends on what state you are in (strict liability vs. one-bite vs. other) and whether the courts rule a 4 year old can "intentionally" provoke a dog. Certainly the scenario where someone where to intentionally provoke a dog in order to sue, would not be liable.
Either way, I now know much more about dog bite statutes than I ever thought .....
ETA: Not sure what Florida law is on the subject.
This post was edited on 8/12/15 at 10:35 am
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:33 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Well you seem to be insinuating the family is assholes for wanting the dog to be put down. And Caterpillar has directly said the family wants the dog put down, which is the opposite
Why are you asking if I read the article? I quoted it several times to people that clearly hadn't.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:33 am to lsupride87
quote:
Caterpillar and LNCH keep blaming the family for wanting the dog put down.
What thread are you reading?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:34 am to lsupride87
quote:
Well you seem to be insinuating the family is assholes for wanting the dog to be put down.
Do you just make things up?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:34 am to LNCHBOX
quote:I aplogize if you havent. But Cat clearly has in here
What thread are you reading?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:35 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Really? You dont think anywhere in here you have insinuated it is the families fault the dog may be put down?
Does This Look Like The Face Of A Criminal To You? by LNCHBOXquote:Well you seem to be insinuating the family is assholes for wanting the dog to be put down. Do you just make things up?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:35 am to Deactived
quote:
Does this suffice your story needs?
It's close
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:35 am to lsupride87
quote:
Really? You dont think anywhere in here you have insinuated it is the families fault the dog may be put down?
Link to it. Because I haven't.
ETA: See my post at the bottom of page two. I insinuate the lawyer wants to put a price on the dog's life, but I never said anything about the owners.
This post was edited on 8/12/15 at 10:37 am
Popular
Back to top


3





