- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does This Look Like The Face Of A Criminal To You?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:38 am to LNCHBOX
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:38 am to LNCHBOX
quote:I say that because I didn't witness it. My inlaws told me about it. But still, my niece was more important than the dog so it had to go.
That's taking it a bit far
2
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:38 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Well here is Caterpillar directly saying it
Link to it. Because I haven't.
quote:Anyway, if you dont beleive that then I apologize for assuming you do. Your agreements with Cat just made be beleive you were echoing his sentiments
The family of the boy are suing the vet and trying to get the dog put down
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:38 am to TheCaterpillar
quote:Read my reply. I clarified.
TheCaterpillar
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:39 am to lsupride87
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:39 am to Sid in Lakeshore
Florida dog bite law
quote:
767.04 Dog owner’s liability for damages to persons bitten.—The owner of any dog that bites any person while such person is on or in a public place, or lawfully on or in a private place, including the property of the owner of the dog, is liable for damages suffered by persons bitten, regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owners’ knowledge of such viciousness. However, any negligence on the part of the person bitten that is a proximate cause of the biting incident reduces the liability of the owner of the dog by the percentage that the bitten person’s negligence contributed to the biting incident. A person is lawfully upon private property of such owner within the meaning of this act when the person is on such property in the performance of any duty imposed upon him or her by the laws of this state or by the laws or postal regulations of the United States, or when the person is on such property upon invitation, expressed or implied, of the owner. However, the owner is not liable, except as to a person under the age of 6, or unless the damages are proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of the owner, if at the time of any such injury the owner had displayed in a prominent place on his or her premises a sign easily readable including the words “Bad Dog.” The remedy provided by this section is in addition to and cumulative with any other remedy provided by statute or common law.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:39 am to TheCaterpillar
No it isn't. Not for reasonable adults at least.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:40 am to GCTIDER
quote:
I say that because I didn't witness it. My inlaws told me about it. But still, my niece was more important than the dog so it had to go.
I think that's insane. Did you not like this dog?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:41 am to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
However, any negligence on the part of the person bitten that is a proximate cause of the biting incident reduces the liability of the owner of the dog by the percentage that the bitten person’s negligence contributed to the biting incident.
Hmmm.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:42 am to LNCHBOX
quote:I think that is extremely reasonable. He did not put down the dog, he found it a new home. If my dog growled at a child he would no longer be my pet. That is called being responsible
I think that's insane. Did you not like this dog?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:43 am to lsupride87
quote:
I think that is extremely reasonable.
Because the dog maybe growled? Hopefully there was more context to it. But from what he posted, that's just silly.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:45 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I think that's insane. Did you not like this dog?
Insane is keeping a dog around that has the proclivity to bite kids.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:46 am to GCTIDER
quote:
I say that because I didn't witness it. My inlaws told me about it. But still, my niece was more important than the dog so it had to go.
This reminds me of a story I heard my grandmother tell about when my older brother was a baby. At that time she owned a poodle. She'd had this dog for years and loved it like a child. This poodle loved to lay on this ottoman she had in her living room. One day they laid my brother on the ottoman for a nap or something. The dog came along , jumped up and bit my brother. My grandmother grabbed the dog, handed it to my uncle (just home from Vietnam btw) then went and got her pistol, and told him to take it out and shoot it. Of course he did as his mom told him. Guess that was just a different time than nowadays.
This post was edited on 8/12/15 at 10:47 am
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:46 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Because the dog maybe growled? Hopefully there was more context to it. But from what he posted, that's just silly.
And then when the dog bites a girl's face, and the girl requires surgery, you'll call her a bitch for filing suit. Right?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:46 am to Artie Rome
quote:
Insane is keeping a dog around that has the proclivity to bite kids.
So now maybe growling is a proclivity to biting kids?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:46 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Im sure his inlaws arent lying to him, the dog growled
Because the dog maybe growled?
quote:It doesnt matter the context. If you have a home with children, they will be running aroung and rambunctious with friends at times when your eyes wont always be on them. If your dog shows any signs of aggression, even if provoked, he has to go. This isnt about "whether it was the kid or dogs fault", it is about logic
Hopefully there was more context to it. But from what he posted, that's just silly.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:46 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Hmmm.
Yep, 4 year old is hardly capable of being negligent. Are the parents negligent fro letting the child go to the vet with a babysitter?
Also, the 6 yr old provision further down shows how the courts should deal with the 4 year old.
It's an unfortunate situation all around. I love dogs. Have ALWAYS had dogs. Mine sleep in the bed right next to me and my wife.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:47 am to lsupride87
quote:
It doesnt matter the context.
bullshite, my dog makes noises that sounds like growls when playing with toys and people.
quote:
it is about logic
The story is lacking logic to me.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:48 am to LNCHBOX
quote:Are his inlaws retards now? Im sure they know the difference
bullshite, my dog makes noises that sounds like growls when playing with toys and people.
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:48 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
So now maybe growling is a proclivity to biting kids?
Growling isn't aggressive behavior towards a child?
Posted on 8/12/15 at 10:49 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
So now maybe growling is a proclivity to biting kids?
I'd say any logical person who sees a dog growling at a child, or anyone else for that matter, would conclude there is a high probability that dog does have a proclivity to biting.
Does that not seem reasonable to you?
Page 10 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News