Started By
Message

re: Does anyone actually believe OJ is innocent?

Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:40 pm to
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
39566 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:40 pm to
His maternal grandparents were from Louisiana. Caddo parish. Did not know that.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
67002 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:41 pm to
Nicole was killed first.
Then Ron came upon this act , then OJ turned and killed him. After this, he went back to Nicole and slit her throat to the point of nearly decapitation. These are facts detailed by blood splatter analysis by the coroner.
The facts that OJ committed the crime are incredibly overwhelming.
Where do I start? How about the limo driver, Park, who stated he saw OJ jump over the fence at his house when he was there waiting to give him a ride to the airport.
Kato Kalen heard noises behind his quarters where the glove was found.
OJ had cuts on his left hand.
I'm just giving you some simple ones that don't involve any potential police framing.
It's a damn shame he spent one minute out of jail after those brutal murders.
Posted by NWarty
Somewhere in the PNW
Member since Sep 2013
2181 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:45 pm to
Four pages and no youtube OJ reaction video. Pfft...

Here you go:
Youtube OJ Verdict Reaction

That and the Oprah show reaction....holy ish....
This post was edited on 2/2/16 at 8:47 pm
Posted by Mars duMorgue
Sunset Dist/SF
Member since Aug 2015
2816 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

He said he was gonna find her killer.

As OJ said later, "Hey, how can I look for the killer and play golf at the same time? It's a matter of priorities."
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

That whole fricking circus was Lance Ito's fault.

He should have barred TV cameras and put a gag order on everyone from the fricking start.



I 100% agree with you. Lance Ito is the single most incompetent judge in American history. He should have taken out a harakiri knife right on the stand as soon as the jury said "Not Guilty". He dragged this trial out for a year when it should have lasted a month tops, and then escalated it all over the media instead of kicking the cameras out of the court room. This makes the public even more involved and for this jury to return home pronouncing OJ Simpson guilty highly dangerous. So of course they take 4 hours to deliberate, all agree that they'll get killed if they pronounced OJ guilty, don't go over really any of the evidence, and just call for some random piece of BS to make it look like they actually deliberated on the verdict. Ito should have had his position and right to practice law at large revoked after the trial.
This post was edited on 2/2/16 at 8:49 pm
Posted by Easy
Los Angeles
Member since Dec 2008
5837 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:47 pm to
I don't know if he did it, but I believe that he was framed by the LAPD, specifically Furhmans racist arse. But since that bitch Judge Karlins let Latasha Harlin's killer free despite it being on video, I was very satisfied with the OJ verdict. Sorry not sorry.
Posted by threeputt
God's Country
Member since Sep 2008
24828 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

Does this video answer your question?


What question did I ask

I stated that I thought OJ's son is quilty as does one of the leading DNA expert in the country .. I never asked a question.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28928 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

How do they get OJ's blood



By court order after he was arrested. That unused portion was treated with the preservative EDTA and then spent 16 hrs in the trunk of Vannadder's car. They continued to find OJ's blood in various places for days afterward.

quote:

The blood is all over the scene of the damn crime



OJ's wasn't. Just a few splatters. And it contained the blood preservative EDTA. I'm not arguing that he didn't kill those people but the blood containing the EDTA came from the unused portion of the court ordered sample. The preservative proved it.
Posted by prince of fools
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
1130 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

I stated that I thought OJ's son is quilty as does one of the leading DNA expert in the country .. I never asked a question.



Its in response to the title of the whole damn thread which is presented in a question format.
Posted by RJYH
Member since Aug 2010
6934 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

I recently watched a long, detailed documentary on it. That's not at all how they said it occurred. They said Ron was going to her house to drop off eyeglasses she had left at the restaurant, and came up on OJ killing her. He tried to help her out, and OJ turned on him.


link?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:52 pm to
quote:

shinerfan


Let me guess: you're black?
Posted by tigerstripedjacket
This side of the wall
Member since Sep 2011
3147 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:53 pm to
Of course he's innocent. Court found him not guilty. Don't you trust our justice system?
Posted by threeputt
God's Country
Member since Sep 2008
24828 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

The blood was all over the scene of the damn crime


Whose? Not OJ's
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28928 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:54 pm to
North LA whiteboy and Republican
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

North LA whiteboy and Republican



Then how does the blood show up on the crime scene before OJ is arrested?
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28928 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:00 pm to
OJ's didn't, it was found later. How did they miss the blood splattered all over the backseat of the Bronco the night of the chase?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

OJ's didn't, it was found later. How did they miss the blood splattered all over the backseat of the Bronco the night of the chase?



Why would they plant in the Bronco when they only needed it at the crime scene?
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:03 pm to
I certainly think OJ was guilty. I feel for the families. But I gotta say, I got tired of seeing the Goldman father all over the place. He was obnoxious after the first 30 times. I guess some grieve in different ways though.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28928 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:04 pm to
You'll have to ask them but the blood preservative proved that they did.
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43031 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:10 pm to
After watching his buddy with the white bronco speak on the A&E special, even he thinks OJ did it. OJ is one cocky mf'er, and I'm glad he is finally serving time



Ahhh, I figured out what this thread is for. This is a top secret way to figure out who the black posters are
This post was edited on 2/2/16 at 9:14 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram