- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does anyone actually believe OJ is innocent?
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:15 pm to shinerfan
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:15 pm to shinerfan
quote:
You'll have to ask them but the blood preservative proved that they did.
By the way, the show just refuted your evidence. They found OJ's blood at the scene of the crime that night and immediately knew he had a left hand injury. They also saw blood on the Bronco. Not sure if OJ was smart enough to at least wash it off the handle, because if he wasn't, your other evidence is also dead in the water.
2
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:18 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
They found OJ's blood at the scene of the crime that night
No they didn't
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:21 pm to OMLandshark
Made for cable movies are known for their historical accuracy.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:25 pm to OMLandshark
Guilty as sin
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:26 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Made for cable movies are known for their historical accuracy.
Well, they claimed it was as accurate as possible, taking direct transcripts from what was said. At least the series isn't beating around the bush and is telling you out of the gates that he clearly murdered them.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:27 pm to Mars duMorgue
quote:
As OJ said later, "Hey, how can I look for the killer and play golf at the same time? It's a matter of priorities."
LINK
Also, I love the guy saying OJ was his boy after the verdict.
He lived in a gated mansion in Brentwood. It's like saying that Karl Malone is a real down to earth guy while he lives in Newport Beach.
This post was edited on 2/2/16 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:30 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
At least the series isn't beating around the bush and is telling you out of the gates that he clearly murdered them
Oh, I've got no doubt that he did it, I just don't think the verdict was as off the wall as people remember it.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:31 pm to dukke v
quote:
I believe he did it.. Just wonder HOW.... Were they both on the porch?? Who got it 1st??? Why didn't one of them get away????
My theory is that OJ got there first (before Goldman). Goldman rolled up at the end - roughly about the time OJ is delivering the coup de grâce (partial decapitation) - Goldman is stunned. OJ still amped up with the adrenaline of what he has just done, is armed and covered in blood, lunges at Goldman and that's that.
If he took both of them at the same time, I'm fairly confident he had help - A.C. or someone else. But, he got cut, so that's why he left the blood trail.
This post was edited on 2/2/16 at 9:33 pm
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:40 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Oh, I've got no doubt that he did it, I just don't think the verdict was as off the wall as people remember it.
Well, I remember when they read the verdict and thinking it was the craziest most bizzare thing I had ever seen or heard in my young life. I mean it seemed like there was no doubt and no possible way he could be found not guilty even then.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:48 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:49 pm to shinerfan
You can try to blame ALL of the bloody evidence as "planted" by the cops. It's incredibly stupid because the group of cops have no real reason to frame a fairly respected, at the time, black guy in the first place. But I digress. Let's look at everything but the supposed "planted" evidence.
In addition to my previous post we have:
1. A previous and documented attack by OJ on Nicole years prior.
2. The knit cap with afro hairs (this admitted to and agreed by the defense it was there)
3. OJs own differing stories about over sleeping and or hitting golf balls in the yard at the time of the murders, not to mention about breaking glass that cut his hands, of which the cops in Chicago found no broken glass in OJs hotel room.
4. His Italian shoe prints in blood.
5. Her dog, the Akita, that was friendly to the attacker.
6. No robbery took place.
These are just some facts, without any supposed evidence planting, that I'm posting. No one can dispute these facts.
In addition to my previous post we have:
1. A previous and documented attack by OJ on Nicole years prior.
2. The knit cap with afro hairs (this admitted to and agreed by the defense it was there)
3. OJs own differing stories about over sleeping and or hitting golf balls in the yard at the time of the murders, not to mention about breaking glass that cut his hands, of which the cops in Chicago found no broken glass in OJs hotel room.
4. His Italian shoe prints in blood.
5. Her dog, the Akita, that was friendly to the attacker.
6. No robbery took place.
These are just some facts, without any supposed evidence planting, that I'm posting. No one can dispute these facts.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:49 pm to threeputt
quote:
No they didn't
Yes. Yes they did.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:53 pm to OMLandshark
Steve Harvey thought he did it.
LINK
It might have been made into a racial thing, but there isn't one thing that even points to him possibly being innocent.
LINK
It might have been made into a racial thing, but there isn't one thing that even points to him possibly being innocent.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:55 pm to OMLandshark
The surgeon was the boy's mother, I thought this was common knowledge by now.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:56 pm to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
What's the current thinking on who helped OJ clean up and dispose of evidence?
Posted on 2/2/16 at 9:57 pm to Kafka
The people celebrating in that picture are pathetic.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 10:00 pm to Chappy
quote:
Whoever said the blood was planted, you are wrong
And Martz' mentor, Dr. Henry Lee, completely dismantled his testimony.
Posted on 2/2/16 at 10:06 pm to shinerfan
quote:
And Martz' mentor, Dr. Henry Lee, completely dismantled his testimony.
Link?
Posted on 2/2/16 at 10:09 pm to shinerfan
As Havoc said, link?
And as you can see from the article, the only things they were claiming this on was his sock and the gate at Nicole's, that's it
You are making a lot of claims but aren't backing any of them up
And as you can see from the article, the only things they were claiming this on was his sock and the gate at Nicole's, that's it
You are making a lot of claims but aren't backing any of them up
Posted on 2/2/16 at 10:27 pm to Chappy
I can't find a link to Lee's full testimony but here's Dershowitz' lengthy interview on the case with PBS.
LINK
LINK
quote:
There is absolutely no doubt that the sock that was soaked in blood was planted. Why? First of all, the blood had EDTA on it, a chemical that's an anticoagulant that is not found in the human body; it's only found in tubes. So we were able to prove that the police had poured blood from the test tubes onto the sock.
Moreover, the splatter pattern on the sock was such that it was consistent only with blood having been poured on the sock, and not with blood having hit one side of the sock and then soaked through the leg in the middle and then hit the other side of the sock.
Third, there was a videotape of the house on the morning of the search which showed that the black socks were not on the white rug in the place where the police claimed they found them. So I think all the jurors concluded that the sock was planted. And once you conclude that the blood on the sock was planted, you begin to have doubts about all the rest of the evidence.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News