- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you agree with this mans stance on child support?
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:16 pm to shel311
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:16 pm to shel311
quote:
So Blake Griffin who probably makes near $5mil/month as the Father can go on being filthy rich living in a mansion
Yes. He earns that 5MM. It's his
quote:
but should give the mother of his kids only enough to raise them
Sounds reasonable.
quote:
the kids should just live a lower income life if the Mom doesn't get a good job?
Kids do it every day.
2
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:19 pm to CptRusty
quote:Yea, that's my point, you just cut off my post to completely change the context.
Yes. He earns that 5MM. It's his
quote:I never said they didn't.
Kids do it every day.
Where you and I disagree is that you think that it is fair that Daddy gets to live a life of luxury while the kid lives a low income life because the court gives Mom custody, and she may be a piece of shite who can't hold down a job, or maybe she's not even a piece of shite, she just works hard but doesn't make much money.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:20 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
The kid deserves a certain lifestyle.
So if they have a pool, full basket ball court, Xboxes, TVs, bikes, go karts, etc. etc. at Dad's house, then there is some grave injustice of the same things are not available at Mom's?
Get the frick out of here.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:21 pm to LSUvegasbombed
Bottom line: only father children with women who have a similar earning potential.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:22 pm to CptRusty
quote:So you think Dad living in a 50,000 square foot home and the kid living in a 1 bedroom apartment that is 475 square feet is NOT an injustice to a kid?
So if they have a pool, full basket ball court, Xboxes, TVs, bikes, go karts, etc. etc. at Dad's house, then there is some grave injustice of the same things are not available at Mom's?
Get the frick out of here.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:25 pm to shel311
I don't see what Dad's income has to do with the level of "luxury" available at Mom's house.
He should be required to pay his share (not 100%) of basic necessities while they are with Mom. If they want an XBox at Mom's house, she can buy it.
He should be required to pay his share (not 100%) of basic necessities while they are with Mom. If they want an XBox at Mom's house, she can buy it.
This post was edited on 8/16/18 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:26 pm to shel311
quote:
So you think Dad living in a 50,000 square foot home and the kid living in a 1 bedroom apartment that is 475 square feet is NOT an injustice to a kid?
No. Kids live in 475 sq foot apartments every day. They will have access to Dad's OT Baller mansion when they go visit him.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:33 pm to shel311
Having a kid shouldn't become a winning lottery ticket.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:34 pm to CptRusty
quote:Wow, that's amazing.
I don't see what Dad's income has to do with the level of "luxury" available at Mom's house.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:35 pm to CptRusty
quote:Because they don't have an opportunity for the better, or 99.9% of them don't. In this example, there is an opportunity and the child's interest should be put first.
No. Kids live in 475 sq foot apartments every day.
quote:And the other 90% of the time, back to low income living, that's surely the best thing to do for the child, right?
They will have access to Dad's OT Baller mansion when they go visit him.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:36 pm to LSUvegasbombed
Bruh all that male privilege right there.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:38 pm to LSUvegasbombed
Somebody has to pay for shite. Better than splitting every expense every day.
Just pay for your kids. I paid child support. Hell if I wanted to deal w my ex calling me hourly telling me what my share was.
Just pay for your kids. I paid child support. Hell if I wanted to deal w my ex calling me hourly telling me what my share was.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:38 pm to shel311
quote:
So you think Dad living in a 50,000 square foot home and the kid living in a 1 bedroom apartment that is 475 square feet is NOT an injustice to a kid?
I think the judge who awarded the woman custody in that situation should probably be shot.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:38 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:Sure
Having a kid shouldn't become a winning lottery ticket.
And the kid shouldn't be subject to whatever shite living that may be the case because the judge gave custody to the mother who doesn't have many means to care for and house the child while the father makes millions every month.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:39 pm to Jcorye1
quote:What does that have to do with what you quoted?
I think the judge who awarded the woman custody in that situation should probably be shot.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:41 pm to shel311
quote:
And the kid shouldn't be subject to whatever shite living that may be the case because the judge gave custody to the mother who doesn't have many means to care for and house the child while the father makes millions every month.
So who can support the child better? Dad doesn't need to make Mom rich because they had a child together.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:43 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:Sure, that's an entirely separate issue.
So who can support the child better?
But if the judge is going to give custody to the mother, the idea of her getting the absolute minimum needed to raise a child when the father is filthy rich is just silly if you actually place what's best for the child as the top priority.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:44 pm to shel311
quote:
that's surely the best thing to do for the child, right?
If you are conflating income with a child's ability to be properly raised, then I feel sorry for any children you might have.
They should have a safe, healthy environment regardless of who they are with. They should have their basic needs met: food, clothing, medical care, school, etc.. Beyond that, it's up to either parent to provide "luxuries". If they want an Xbox at Mom's, Mom can either ask Dad to pitch in, or pay on her own. I do not believe it is a court's place to force Dad to buy Xboxes and Bicycles for Mom's house.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:46 pm to LSUvegasbombed
The dude in the OP pic is one of those guys that wants a cookie and a pat on the head for buying a pack of Pampers every three weeks and a toy truck at Christmas.
frick him.
frick him.
Posted on 8/16/18 at 3:47 pm to CptRusty
quote:More income most certainly affords more opportunities, there's no question about that.
If you are conflating income with a child's ability to be properly raised, then I feel sorry for any children you might have.
Prayers sent if you want to argue otherwise.
Sounds like you're actually conflating me saying that more income automatically means he'll have better parenting, which I didn't say. Are you actually trying to argue more income doesn't give you access to more opportunities?
quote:That's your opinion, and you can't possibly say you're putting the kids' priorities first in the divorce if that's your take. That's the issue with your take.
They should have a safe, healthy environment regardless of who they are with. They should have their basic needs met: food, clothing, medical care, school, etc.. Beyond that, it's up to either parent to provide "luxuries".
This post was edited on 8/16/18 at 3:49 pm
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News