- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:29 am to tgrbaitn08
I just flipped this on. Can someone explain what happened?
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:30 am to SOSFAN
quote:
No mistrial. Judge gave them a mulligan.
Yikes
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:30 am to Veritas
Judge told prosecution that their rebuttal witness could not mention the lab test results and out of the gate he starts with it. Objection...Sustained... no mistrial
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:31 am to RLDSC FAN
Well there is grounds for an appeal
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:31 am to SOSFAN
quote:
No mistrial. Judge gave them a mulligan.
Could that be used in an appeal?
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:31 am to Veritas
No way the jury is understanding all of this.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:31 am to TDTOM
Has to
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:32 am to SOSFAN
Well, even if Chauvin is convicted, the appeal is looking strong.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:32 am to Veritas
Prosecution wanted to introduce rebuttal evidence. The evidence is a study of the carbon monoxide levels in GF on day of death. They never introduced this study into evidence. But yesterday, the defense witness indicated he could of died from monoxide from car. Prompting Dr. Baker (prosecution witness) to call the prosecution last night to tell them they have a study that was never provided by Hennepin during subpoena. Defense argued they had ample opportunity to get this evidence and discuss it.
Judge ruled cannot talk about the study but can have Tobin back on the stand. Warned prosecution if study is brought it up at all, mistrail. Prosecution got damn close to the study being discussed. Defense turn to cross. I think thats a good summary - idk.
Judge ruled cannot talk about the study but can have Tobin back on the stand. Warned prosecution if study is brought it up at all, mistrail. Prosecution got damn close to the study being discussed. Defense turn to cross. I think thats a good summary - idk.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:32 am to Veritas
Yes.
Defense called a witness yesterday (Witness 1) who mentioned carbon monoxide.
Prosecution moves today to re-call a previous witness based on testimony of witness 1 because they claim they didn't know that Witness 1 would say what he said.
Witness 1's testimony was all documented in his report that the proseuction had.
Nelson said additionally he doesn't want the witness to mention a "Test" that was supposedly performed based on testimony of witness 1.
Nelson received notice of this test yesterday. Why wasn't this test presented in this guy's initial testimony?
Nelson says he will move for mistrial if this guy mentions the test.
Judge says guy can testify but if mentions test it will be mistrial.
Witness mentions test. Here we are
Defense called a witness yesterday (Witness 1) who mentioned carbon monoxide.
Prosecution moves today to re-call a previous witness based on testimony of witness 1 because they claim they didn't know that Witness 1 would say what he said.
Witness 1's testimony was all documented in his report that the proseuction had.
Nelson said additionally he doesn't want the witness to mention a "Test" that was supposedly performed based on testimony of witness 1.
Nelson received notice of this test yesterday. Why wasn't this test presented in this guy's initial testimony?
Nelson says he will move for mistrial if this guy mentions the test.
Judge says guy can testify but if mentions test it will be mistrial.
Witness mentions test. Here we are
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:32 am to Veritas
quote:
I just flipped this on. Can someone explain what happened?
so... from what I can gather
since defense brought up carbon monoxide poisoning... prosecution found a study they wanted to use to refute it
defense objected saying no... you knew about this already and decided not to act on it during the presentation of your case... tough titties
judge apparently said you can re-call the witness who found the study... but you best not ask said witness about that study
prosecution towing the line of trying to talk about the new evidence but not really talking about it
This post was edited on 4/15/21 at 10:34 am
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:32 am to SOSFAN
Prosecutor rest with Dr. Tobin
Nelson is next.
Taking a strech break
Chauvin lit a doobie up....
Nelson is next.
Taking a strech break
Chauvin lit a doobie up....
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:34 am to BrewDrees95
Thanks for the summary everyone.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:34 am to SOSFAN
They called the judges bluff. I mean he explicitly said he can’t testify on the new evidence and they did it anyway.
I mean it’s a win-win for the prosecution, they either mistrial and get another shot at Chauvin or they get the jury to hear about the evidence even after the judge disallowed it.
I mean it’s a win-win for the prosecution, they either mistrial and get another shot at Chauvin or they get the jury to hear about the evidence even after the judge disallowed it.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:35 am to SOSFAN
Since there now is the appearance of the judge being favoring the prosecution, what can Nelson do?
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:35 am to SOSFAN
Interesting that the prosecutor didn't try to get him to dispute the enlarged heart. Wonder if he was worried that he or the witness would say something wrong.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:35 am to Sherman Klump
quote:
Yes but bad news that they get to call their best witness again.
Meh! He's starting to give off an Anthony Fauci vibe to me now.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:36 am to Amadeo
Going to recess... Ruh Roh.
I mean judge said cant use it, they used it, I see a mistrial.
I mean judge said cant use it, they used it, I see a mistrial.
Posted on 4/15/21 at 10:37 am to SOSFAN
Coming back in 10 mins
Page 393 of 524
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News