- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Deputies arrest 4 in LSU student Madison Brooks case
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:00 pm to MMauler
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:00 pm to MMauler
quote:
But I will say this, sometimes when a girl is kissing on a guy in a bar and grinding all over him, that could be an indication that she wants to go home and get f*cked by him.
If I screwed every girl I danced with and kissed, I’d have Ron Jeremy type numbers. This is nonsense.
0
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:00 pm to VADawg
quote:
Black people vote democrat at a nearly 95% clip. That's pretty monolithic.
Their vote and their views don't always align because of LBJ. They vote D because of populist pandering.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:00 pm to JudgeHolden
They are definitely going with the strategy that the .319 test was wrong
Lab error will be their focus
Lab error will be their focus
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:01 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Based on her actions and what Reggies is saying," we think the results of BAC are inaccurate. Basically no way she had a .319. They are challenging the BAC test.
Did they address the fact that their own clients volunteered that she was shitfaced drunk and incoherent?
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:02 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Cliffs on press conference:
The cliffs from the press conference all but confirm that the lawyers strategically released the video outside of Reggie’s and nothing else.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:02 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Lab error will be their focus
Then they screwed.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:02 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Bro you talked abkut the Uber driver and his role in this for over a day
it was more about me having to defend myself from the faux outrage over asking some important questions about the details of the accident. Congrats on your upvotes from all the morons.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:03 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Lab error will be their focus
Desperate ploy
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Maybe its because most black people I know aren't part of this mythical "black community" Democrats rave about.
How do blacks vote again in national elections?
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:06 pm to titmouse
quote:
See the Raxx bar murder
Hung jury on first trial. Conviction of second degree murder on retrial. He did not get off.
Jury Convicts Him on Retrial
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:06 pm to MMauler
So to be clear, it's your contention that the only shot a da has against a black defendant is to have 10 or more white jurors?
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:06 pm to JudgeHolden
Thanks for the cliffs. After a few incorrect uses of the word on, I couldn’t deal. He should’ve had someone else write that for him
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:07 pm to TigerFred
quote:
And then there’s Chad who believes it’s the Uber driver’s fault.
i gave you an upvote to add to your pile of shitty clicks.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:07 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
They state there is video showing her leaving the car in good health. Video taken in the car does not depict any sexual acts. "Intent and consent will be very clear" based on videos. Questions are hard to hear, but it seems like they are saying they have video after the sex occurred. "Brooks approached them from the bar" as shown on video.
Well, release them if they show your clients are innocent. Except you said this exact thing to the judge and he disagreed and the prosecutor wanted to up the charges to 1st degree rape after seeing the video.
Put your money where your mouth is. Release the videos publicly.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:07 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
"When you see the video, you will know for sure this is not a rape."
But when the judge saw the video he said there was clearly a crime here, and the prosecution upgraded their charges.
This is all bullshite by the defense side. They are trying to create a narrative in the court of public opinion and get to the potential jury pool.
The lawyer thinks he’s Johnny Cochran but he’s going to get steamrolled when the driver flips.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:08 pm to WestSideTiger
quote:
I agree with that and I also think it’s likely a jury would find guilty at least one
Look, as I’ve said many times, it very well may be that the 18-year-old's case is different than the 17-year-old's case. The video inside the car is going to make all the difference in the world with respect to the 18-year-old's
If the video shows that he just jumped on top of her after the 17-year-old was finished, then there’s a real possibility that the 17-year-old could get off and the 18 year old goes to Angola.
Given the facts as we know them, I would say that all four should have separate attorneys as their interests may conflict.
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:08 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
No.
You don't get a summons for a particular trial. You get it for a date. You don't know which trial you are being called in. Then you go into a pool for all jury trials that day.
Prosecutors are not "handcuffed" on peremptory strikes. The defense can raise a Batson challenge to a strike by making an initial showing that it is racially motivated. The prosecution then has to state a neutral reason for the challenge. If the prosecutors have done any kind of decent voir dire at all, that is not much a a hurdle.
Now this next part is going to piss you off. You made some absolute and borderline hysterical statements about something you seem to know very little about. Why do you feel you have to stir this shite up?
But but but ....
OJ!
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:08 pm to WaWaWeeWa
i'm worried about the defendant's statements somehow someway getting thrown out based on some technicality.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:10 pm to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
As for race, I’m not the one saying “this girl would never willingly leave with 3 black guys!”
Can you link to anyone saying this, and this only?
Make sure to include the full statement.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 1:10 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Did they address the fact that their own clients volunteered that she was shitfaced drunk and incoherent?
I don't think so. It was hard to hear the reporters' questions, though.
They don't seem to dispute that she was drunk. They point to the statutory language of how drunk she had to be for this to be third degree rape.
quote:
When the victim is incapable of resisting or of understanding the nature of the act by reason of a stupor or abnormal condition of mind produced by an intoxicating agent or any cause and the offender knew or should have known of the victim's incapacity.
Basically they are saying is she could run across the parking lot, she was not that drunk. They also seem to be saying that the post-sex video shows her to be coherent enough to consent.
Page 202 of 419
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News