Started By
Message

re: Dedicated passenger train from Baton Rouge to New Orleans "3-5 years away"

Posted on 7/15/15 at 7:47 am to
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 7:47 am to
quote:

They need to be spending money on a loop for BR instead of this stupid bullshite.


Read the plan. 80% of the money is coming from the federal government that can only be used on rail.

quote:

The capital investment to start the service will cost $262 million, 80 percent of which could be underwritten by federal funds, the study says. The proposed rail is nearly half as costly -- both in infrastructure and operating expenses -- as the high-speed rail plan that Gov. Bobby Jindal put an end to in 2010. While that plan proposed rail that would travel 110 miles per hour, the proposed rail line would operate at a maximum speed of 79 miles per hour to begin with, which is competitive with cars traveling on Interstate 10.


Also the ROW is already there because the tracks are already there. So the NIMBYs that are stopping the loop can't say shite.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Airport parking is probably more expensive than a train ride. Parking in NOLA is probably more expensive than a train ride. The bigger question is definitely who's going to take the train back to Baton Rouge other than Baton Rougeans returning home? Downtown business meetings and LSU sports only goes so far. For this to be successful that corridor would really have to grow. Maybe if they built that big airport in between BR and NOLA they're always talking about it would work out. Then you get traffic from both cities using it regularly, even if it's only for half the line.

Regarding the horror of mass transit for southerners, it's all about being useful. Does the proposed commuter train really seem less dangerous or filled with fewer unwashed masses than the French Quarter you're taking the train to?


The plan has stops in Gonzalez and around OLOL in BR. So if (big if) BR improves CATS and/or builds the streetcars or BRT (I like BRT because they are a 1/3rd the price and offer all the benefits) then communters could ride it. If it is like other communter rail options Gonzalez to BR would cost about $4 dollars one way and take about 20 minutes of sitting in a comfortable train car with wifi and not stuck in your car in BR traffic. Also if the BR station is placed on government street the only thing that woulc have to be built is a switch and connecting segment and the line could be extended all the way to Hammond along the Union Pacific line.

The communter rail plan is realistic if BR and the other communities improve their mass/public transportation to feed into it. There are several examples of communter rail in cities with a population simialr to the combined NOLA & EBR population. The NOLA-BR line would be the longest, but there is also plenty of economic activity along the route that other lines don't have.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 8:17 am to
quote:

They couldn't complete I-10 in BR in 3-5 years, but I'm going to believe they're going to build a rail line in that time?


Because all they have to do is build a new bridge over the bonnet carre spillway, build the stations and buy the trains. They will run on existing track. Also the 3-5 years is for the approval all the studies say it will take 7 years to get the trains (apparently there is a massive backlog due to other lines updating their equipment) and making the necessary track improvements.



Just a quick question to anyone who wants to answer? Do yall remember how much the North Blvd overpass cost? When this plan was first unveiled last year I was looking at the map of the route and Government street, College Dr, and Essen would need overpasses to minimize impact of increased traffic if the trains ever go to a full demand schedule (train leaving every 30 minutes). I was just trying to get a rough ballpark figure of how expensive that would be. thanks.
Posted by brodeo
Member since Feb 2013
1850 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Just a quick question to anyone who wants to answer? Do yall remember how much the North Blvd overpass cost? When this plan was first unveiled last year I was looking at the map of the route and Government street, College Dr, and Essen would need overpasses to minimize impact of increased traffic if the trains ever go to a full demand schedule (train leaving every 30 minutes). I was just trying to get a rough ballpark figure of how expensive that would be. thanks

North Boulevard cost $16.4 million. If one were to extrapolate that across 3 other similar projects (College, Essen, and Government Street), that would be a total expense of about $50 million.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 8:31 am to
quote:

We'd have this by now if Jindal wasn't trying to stick it to Obama and refuse federal infrastructure funds a few years back.

Another shining example of Jindal looking out for Louisianians.


Not true at all. The plan Jindal refused federal funds for was the high speed train. It was going to cost over half billion and only be able to run at high-speed for a 5 mile segment of track. The track is too curvy and has too many crossing points to achieve high speed. So the new plan is traditional communter rail at half the price he never turned down funds for it, but go ahead and spew your bullshite.
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George, LA
Member since Aug 2004
80694 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 8:35 am to
quote:

it's needed


Not really.

quote:

It's wanted


Debatable. Maybe by the politicians waiting for there kickbacks.

quote:

It's overdue


No it's really not.


quote:

It WILL happen.



I hope not. Huge waste of money.

Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 8:36 am to
quote:

Don't forget the sensitive wetlands along the route. That's not just an aesthetic concern. You have to worry about coastal erosion and hurricane protection. And speaking of hurricanes, we have to elevate the tracks so we don't get a repeat of the twin spans. That will add a fortune to the cost.

It's a bad idea all around. This type of mass transit works for the Amtrak corridor (which is why it's already there) or for wide open areas out West. The I-10 corridor, not so much.


The tracks are already there. The only track upgrades are a new double tracked bridge over the spillway and upgrading the signals at intersections that allow trains to run at higher speeds through them.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74261 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Replacing the 1.8-mile wooden rail bridge across the Bonnet Carre Spillway, where trains now crawl at 10 mph,


seemed longer than 1.8 miles to me.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Pass. You know it's going to get delayed to be over 2 hours and stopping 7 times between Nola and BR?

It's only 70 fricking miles. Stopping every 10 miles?

ETA:

Just read the proposed stops. All of them are within the cities of BR and NOLA?

Who designed this thing?


Ppl that know what the f**k they are talking about much more than you. It is a COMMUTER rail and so the majority of its ridership will be commuters and gameday, weekend riders, etc will be secondary. If the ridership is ever there they can easily add an express train that goes from CBD to Mid-City BR with one stop at MSY that will take about an hour.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42636 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 8:54 am to
When I was a kid I took a passenger train ride from BR to NO and back. They quit providing train service for a reason. It lost money.

A new service won't stand on its own no matter how much money Obama plugs into the construction. It's all social engineering, big govt, and not capitalism.
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George, LA
Member since Aug 2004
80694 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Ppl that know what the f**k they are talking about much more than you. It is a COMMUTER rail and so the majority of its ridership will be commuters and gameday, weekend riders, etc will be secondary. If the ridership is ever there they can easily add an express train that goes from CBD to Mid-City BR with one stop at MSY that will take about an hour.




No one has yet answered the question... How are people going to get around BR once they get off the train? The public transportation system in BR is absolute garbage.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42636 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:02 am to
quote:

How are people going to get around BR once they get off the train?


Exactly, who is going to fight traffic and drive to downtown BR, park and then ride a train to NO?

It's all polyanna stuff.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:13 am to
quote:

No one has yet answered the question... How are people going to get around BR once they get off the train? The public transportation system in BR is absolute garbage.


Too lazy to use google and find the plan?

the FuturEBR plan is designed with the railroad in mind. It has plans for a downtown-LSU streetcar/BRT and atreet/BRT along either Government or Florida. It also includes plans for an improved CATS system.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Exactly, who is going to fight traffic and drive to downtown BR, park and then ride a train to NO?



Depends on where they are coming from. There will be stops mid-city, OLOL area, and Gonzalez that they can go to. Why wouldn't ppl do a park and ride to work? Ppl utilize park and ride buses and trains in cities all over the world and with BR's traffic grid, NIMBY's and the height reqirements for any Ms River bridge fixing Br's congestion problem with car is never going to work. There needs to be other option and commuter rail is just one of those options.
Posted by brodeo
Member since Feb 2013
1850 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:21 am to
quote:

it's needed


Not really.









quote:

It's wanted


Debatable. Maybe by the politicians waiting for there kickbacks.

I want it. I'm not a politician. I just hate traffic. Having this option would make it much easier to see my family in Gonzales as well as head down to New Orleans to have fun or fly out of MSY. I could be in Gonzales in less than 30 minutes when traffic snarles will make it take an hour or more.

quote:

It's overdue


No it's really not.


It really is. As tied together as this region is, we need more transportation avenues to move back and forth.

quote:

It WILL happen.


I hope not. Huge waste of money.


It's expensive, but I believe it to be a very worthwhile project, and just the start to something much bigger and better. What I envision is a commuter rail network in South Louisiana with stops all along 190 that would connect Houston, Beaumont, Lake Charles, Lafayette, Baton Rouge, Denham Springs, Walker, Hammond, Covington, and Slidell.

You would have the Northshore Express which would run from Slidell to Baton Rouge

The Ponchetrain Express would Make a loop around the lake with stops in Covington, Hammond, La Place, Kenner, Metairie, New Orleans CBD, New Orleans Bywater, and Slidell.

Then there would be the Oil Line which is an express train with stops only in New Orleans CBD, MSY, downtown BR, Lafayette, Lake Charles, Beaumont, and Houston.

Finally, the current River Queen Line of downtown BR, OLOL, Blue Bayou/Dixie Landin' (potential future stop), Gonzales, LaPlace, MSY, Zephyr, CBD

The main stations for transfers would be Downtown BR (Oil Line, River Queen Line, Northshore Express), Hammond, LaPlace, MSY, and CBD

In the future, there would also be a Westbank "Chem" Express that would have stops in Downtown BR and Exxon before crossing the Old Bridge, then Port Allen (there would be shuttles from this stop to surrounding plants and major facilities funded through partnerships with local employers), Dow, Plaquemine, Donaldsonville (more shuttles), Vacherie, Taft, Luling, Avondale, and then reconnect with the River Queen Line at MSY after going over the Huey P. That would be great for plant workers. I can only imagine how many people in BR would take that to avoid sitting in Bridge traffic trying to get home from Dow.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42636 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:22 am to
quote:

the FuturEBR plan is designed with the railroad in mind. It has plans for a downtown-LSU streetcar/BRT and atreet/BRT along either Government or Florida. It also includes plans for an improved CATS system.


There are a lot of consultants making money drawing up plans that will take a long time to implement, or will never happen.

I might be an old fogey, but a trolley between LSU and downtown BR seems like a boondoggle unless the developers in between LSU and downtown really put things in high gear.

A commuter line between BR and NO is in the same boat.

I don't see the interest there, and I can't see these things paying for themselves even if the Feds give us the money to build them.

And don't forget Federal money is our money too. It's not like it's free. It comes with a price.

Watch CATS now that it has a very big dedicated tax base to see if it ever realizes the goals set for it. If it ever turns the corner, and becomes more viable then the other rail projects may have a shot.

Posted by brodeo
Member since Feb 2013
1850 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:24 am to
quote:

I might be an old fogey, but a trolley between LSU and downtown BR seems like a boondoggle unless the developers in between LSU and downtown really put things in high gear.


Someone must be living under a rock. The gentrification of Nicholson is in full swing. Google "Nicholson Gateway Baton Rouge"
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42636 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Depends on where they are coming from. There will be stops mid-city, OLOL area, and Gonzalez that they can go to. Why wouldn't ppl do a park and ride to work? Ppl utilize park and ride buses and trains in cities all over the world and with BR's traffic grid, NIMBY's and the height reqirements for any Ms River bridge fixing Br's congestion problem with car is never going to work. There needs to be other option and commuter rail is just one of those options.


They have park and ride now, but few people use it. Instead of trains people park and ride the bus to NO, they park and ride the bus from BR suburbs to downtown BR too. At least they did. I don't know if they still offer these services or not because there wasn't a whole lot of interest.

There was more post Katrina(BR to NO) but now I'm not so sure.

First of all you are talking about two different problems. How would a train from NO to BR and back do much of anything for BR traffic. How many New Orleanians commute to BR every day? Some, but enough to take a dent off BR traffic? I don't think so.

Now a rail line from parts of EBR, Livingston, and Ascension would do more good, but that would require several rail lines from say Walker to BR, Gonzales to BR and these lines would have to interconnect to downtown BR, the hospital corridor, LSU, etc. Just running a train from NO to BR(downtown/midcity) doesn't do much even if it stopped in Gonzales.

All this train talk avoids the big problem. What to do with I-10 in downtown BR. It's horrific and the design is crazy. One lane, good entrances and exits, no shoulders, etc. create a huge bottleneck that has been tolerated for way too long and needs to be corrected.
Posted by brodeo
Member since Feb 2013
1850 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:39 am to
quote:

They have park and ride now, but few people use it. Instead of trains people park and ride the bus to NO, they park and ride the bus from BR suburbs to downtown BR too. At least they did. I don't know if they still offer these services or not because there wasn't a whole lot of interest.


They still do. Ridership is increasing, but busses suffer from the same problem as motorists, the busses and cars have to endure the same traffic and clogged lanes. Trains get to skip all of that.

quote:

First of all you are talking about two different problems. How would a train from NO to BR and back do much of anything for BR traffic.


The stops at OLOL and Gonzales would do more than almost any loop concept out there at getting commuters off the interstate. Throw in one more stop near Blue Bayou and you get a TON of cars off the road.

quote:

How many New Orleanians commute to BR every day? Some, but enough to take a dent off BR traffic? I don't think so.


Not a ton of New Orleanians going to BR, true. However, there's a ton of people around Gonzales and LaPlace going to New Orleans. Lots of people from Baton Rouge going to New Orleans for business, fun, or flights. Lots of people from New Orleans going to BR for sporting events. Not to mention the massive numbers of people in Kennahbrah and Metairie who work in the CBD. This would serve them as well.

quote:

Now a rail line from parts of EBR, Livingston, and Ascension would do more good, but that would require several rail lines from say Walker to BR, Gonzales to BR and these lines would have to interconnect to downtown BR, the hospital corridor, LSU, etc. Just running a train from NO to BR(downtown/midcity) doesn't do much even if it stopped in Gonzales.


Rail that traverses downtown to LSU is in the works. Rail that goes across Mid City to BRCC and Independence Park is farther down the road, but in the planning stages.

Just as the tracks already exist heading to New Orleans, tracks to LP and the Northshore already exist. I'm sure a lot of folks in Denham and Walker would love to avoid the clusterf&%k that is I-12 to skip straight to the heart of the city.

quote:

All this train talk avoids the big problem. What to do with I-10 in downtown BR. It's horrific and the design is crazy. One lane, good entrances and exits, no shoulders, etc. create a huge bottleneck that has been tolerated for way too long and needs to be corrected.


This isn't an either/or, this is an AND. The problem with upgrading the interstate is real estate. There's not enough land currently to expand to fit what is needed. It gets extremely expensive (both financially and politically) trying to purchase land, displace people, and displace businesses in order to add more capacity to our interstates. It needs to be done, absolutely, but adding a rail option would certainly be helpful to say the least.

We don't just need rail. We don't just need improvements to the Bridge.

We need rail AND improvements to the bridge AND a loop. It's expensive AND necessary.
This post was edited on 7/15/15 at 9:43 am
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:40 am to
quote:

There are a lot of consultants making money drawing up plans that will take a long time to implement, or will never happen.

I might be an old fogey, but a trolley between LSU and downtown BR seems like a boondoggle unless the developers in between LSU and downtown really put things in high gear.

A commuter line between BR and NO is in the same boat.

I don't see the interest there, and I can't see these things paying for themselves even if the Feds give us the money to build them.

And don't forget Federal money is our money too. It's not like it's free. It comes with a price.

Watch CATS now that it has a very big dedicated tax base to see if it ever realizes the goals set for it. If it ever turns the corner, and becomes more viable then the other rail projects may have a shot.


1. The train is 10-12 years away. The approval is 3-5 the author of the article in the OP is extremely misleading. The designers of the plan predicted 7 years to build a new spillway bridge, upgrade the track, build the stations, buy/lease the trains.
2. Things for the streetcar are in high gear, but dealing with government is never fast so take your ridalin and look at whats happening. It will be up and working before the first passenger train ever pulls into government street (assuming the train actually becomes a reality).
3. Federal money is our money too, but it is already set aside and reserved for that and as long as the federal government is offering we might as well take it if the plan is reasonable. The high speed rail plan was not reasonable, but the commuter plan is. I wish the feds would stop wasting money on this but they aren't anytime soon so we might as well get some good out of it instead of letting California, Nashville, and every other city that is building rail get all the money.
4. The problem with CATS is not the funding but the management of it. That fact does worry me about the train, but it will more than likely be contracted out to a private company to manage. The company that runs the RTA also runs the Orlando commuter rail and several other commuter rail and they do a good job of managing it.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram