Started By
Message

re: Dedicated passenger train from Baton Rouge to New Orleans "3-5 years away"

Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:43 am to
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78409 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Didn't the I-10 expansion in BR take ~10 years? And that was just one lane addition



This is a great comparison for people talking about how expensive this is.

quote:

(Open to traffic) Interstate 10, from the I-10/12 split to Siegen Lane.
Construction start - early 2009.
Project completion - mid 2013.
Construction cost - $86.2 million.

(Open to traffic) Interstate 10, from the Siegen Lane interchange to Highland Road.
Construction start - mid 2010.
Project completion - mid 2013.
Construction cost - $60 million.


$140MM for about 5 miles of expansion that did almost nothing to alleviate traffic. Just pushed it further down the road. It still goes down to two lanes where it merges with I12.

Down I12, they are spending $200MM to get from O'neal to Satsuma road...with one lane.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42636 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:44 am to
quote:

The gentrification of Nicholson is in full swing.

I know all that, but what is happening right now.
They have tried to start the river district, but river levels have slowed that project down.

The larger project at LSU and down Nicholson is still being planned. Until I see how these projects go, I'm not ready to tell you a trolley from LSU and downtown is vital.

It may be, but what will the demand be and when will the demand happen? That's the key.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
177328 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:46 am to
quote:

I'm sure a lot of folks in Denham and Walker would love to avoid the clusterf&%k that is I-12 to skip straight to the heart of the city.

The day someone from Livingston Parish gets on public transportation is the day Jesus comes back.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42636 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:47 am to
The I-10 and I-12 projects that have been completed have helped traffic immensely; however, until you correct the bottleneck downtown there will still be severe problems.

Continuing to improve I-12 eastward is good too. All of this adds up.

Reality is the I-10/I-12 corridor from the Sabine to the Pearl should be six lanes from border to border and its overdue.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
177328 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Down I12, they are spending $200MM to get from O'neal to Satsuma road...with one lane.

The I-12 expansion has been fantastic. There isn't much complaining to do about that one.

They are going to keep expanding. The plan is to 6 lane I-12 it's entire route.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78409 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:49 am to
quote:

The day someone from Livingston Parish gets on public transportation is the day Jesus comes back.



I don't think LP people would even be interested in carpooling.

I worked with guys that lived 1/4 mile apart and worked exactly the same hours. Were great friends and drank beer every afternoon, never once rode together.
Posted by brodeo
Member since Feb 2013
1850 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:51 am to
quote:

It may be, but what will the demand be and when will the demand happen?


Demand exists. LSU students going downtown to party. People who desire to take advantage of the massive amounts of parking downtown to get to LSU games, workers downtown who can take the train to baseball and basketball games after work, LSU students who live downtown, LSU students and workers who live near Brightside. That's just one part of the system that will eventually connect much of the rest of the city, allowing those in Mid City, Old Goodwood, and St. George to be able to come to LSU via light rail instead of endless gridlock.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78409 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:52 am to
quote:

The I-12 expansion has been fantastic. There isn't much complaining to do about that one.

They are going to keep expanding. The plan is to 6 lane I-12 it's entire route.



I'm not saying it is bad, just giving perspective to how much money is being spent for this project. It is a bargain.

The rail project will never return the $250MM that is invested, yet no road project is held to the same standard.

Hopefully it will just pay for the upkeep, something no road projects do.
Posted by brodeo
Member since Feb 2013
1850 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:53 am to
quote:

The day someone from Livingston Parish gets on public transportation is the day Jesus comes back.


Well, if the trains were clean and those fine citizens of the LP could be convinced that they were not in fact filled with evil sodomites, degenerates, and "coloreds", then maybe they would if it would shave 10 minutes off their commute while allowing them to drink on the train.
This post was edited on 7/15/15 at 9:56 am
Posted by mark65mc
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
11535 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 9:55 am to
Dammit. Season 2 of True Detective could have been set here.

Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:00 am to
quote:

They have park and ride now, but few people use it. Instead of trains people park and ride the bus to NO, they park and ride the bus from BR suburbs to downtown BR too. At least they did. I don't know if they still offer these services or not because there wasn't a whole lot of interest.


Park and ride losses its appeal if it is on a bus that has to sit in traffic. That is the advantage of a train it bypasses the traffic.

quote:

irst of all you are talking about two different problems. How would a train from NO to BR and back do much of anything for BR traffic. How many New Orleanians commute to BR every day? Some, but enough to take a dent off BR traffic? I don't think so.


Read the articles on it. There was an article last year that had the number in the thousands. The train also stops in Gonzalez and the OLOL or MOL area of BR to pickup commuters there. BR drivers spend 42 hours/yr in traffic so there is the need for a commuter train.

quote:

Now a rail line from parts of EBR, Livingston, and Ascension would do more good, but that would require several rail lines from say Walker to BR, Gonzales to BR and these lines would have to interconnect to downtown BR, the hospital corridor, LSU, etc. Just running a train from NO to BR(downtown/midcity) doesn't do much even if it stopped in Gonzales.


The NOLA to BR line could very easily be extended through LP all the way to Hammond. Look on google maps and all that would need to be done is build a connecting segment to the UP line.

quote:

All this train talk avoids the big problem. What to do with I-10 in downtown BR. It's horrific and the design is crazy. One lane, good entrances and exits, no shoulders, etc. create a huge bottleneck that has been tolerated for way too long and needs to be corrected.



There is very little that can be done cheaply. What needs to be done to fix the bottleneck in BR would cost billions and take 20 years to only have that fill up. You can't solve congestion by just adding more lanes that has been proven time and time again. To fix I-10 and I-12 in Br this is what you would need:
1. Build new bridge next to the new bridge so you can have HOV and emergency use lanes and redesign the interchange. That will probably cost $1.5 billion.
2. Build the full loop which should cost just short of $5billion even if it is toll roads we will still pay for it.
3. Finish I-49 so some of the truck traffic goes from NOLA-Laffy and not through BR. IDK what the projected cost for that is.
4. 3 lane I-10 from Gonzalez to NOLA which is about 50 miles and the last figure I heard thrown around was it cost $1million/mile to expand an interstate, but that was in '08 so it is probably much more.

The train on the other hand could carry thousands of commuters/day and bypass all that. SELA needs to do an all of the above with to prepare for 2030-2050. Ther has been alot of talk about the BR-NOLA corrifor being the next Austin-SA type boom and if (big if) that happens there is no way to fixing congestion by just addressing the car.
Posted by brodeo
Member since Feb 2013
1850 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Park and ride losses its appeal if it is on a bus that has to sit in traffic. That is the advantage of a train it bypasses the traffic.

This

quote:

The NOLA to BR line could very easily be extended through LP all the way to Hammond. Look on google maps and all that would need to be done is build a connecting segment to the UP line.

Just like the NOLA to BR route, the tracks already exist. They just need to upgrade some of the road crossings and add stations.

quote:

There is very little that can be done cheaply. What needs to be done to fix the bottleneck in BR would cost billions and take 20 years to only have that fill up. You can't solve congestion by just adding more lanes that has been proven time and time again. To fix I-10 and I-12 in Br this is what you would need:
1. Build new bridge next to the new bridge so you can have HOV and emergency use lanes and redesign the interchange. That will probably cost $1.5 billion.
2. Build the full loop which should cost just short of $5billion even if it is toll roads we will still pay for it.
3. Finish I-49 so some of the truck traffic goes from NOLA-Laffy and not through BR. IDK what the projected cost for that is.
4. 3 lane I-10 from Gonzalez to NOLA which is about 50 miles and the last figure I heard thrown around was it cost $1million/mile to expand an interstate, but that was in '08 so it is probably much more.


All of this

We don't just need passenger rail or interstate improvements, we need both, a loop, and massive surface street improvements. We need to be throwing a TON of money at infrastructure, but instead, we're barely (as in "not even") maintaining current obligations and pillaging the highway fund for everything not related to highway construction.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:07 am to
quote:

It's expensive, but I believe it to be a very worthwhile project, and just the start to something much bigger and better. What I envision is a commuter rail network in South Louisiana with stops all along 190 that would connect Houston, Beaumont, Lake Charles, Lafayette, Baton Rouge, Denham Springs, Walker, Hammond, Covington, and Slidell.

You would have the Northshore Express which would run from Slidell to Baton Rouge

The Ponchetrain Express would Make a loop around the lake with stops in Covington, Hammond, La Place, Kenner, Metairie, New Orleans CBD, New Orleans Bywater, and Slidell.

Then there would be the Oil Line which is an express train with stops only in New Orleans CBD, MSY, downtown BR, Lafayette, Lake Charles, Beaumont, and Houston.

Finally, the current River Queen Line of downtown BR, OLOL, Blue Bayou/Dixie Landin' (potential future stop), Gonzales, LaPlace, MSY, Zephyr, CBD

The main stations for transfers would be Downtown BR (Oil Line, River Queen Line, Northshore Express), Hammond, LaPlace, MSY, and CBD

In the future, there would also be a Westbank "Chem" Express that would have stops in Downtown BR and Exxon before crossing the Old Bridge, then Port Allen (there would be shuttles from this stop to surrounding plants and major facilities funded through partnerships with local employers), Dow, Plaquemine, Donaldsonville (more shuttles), Vacherie, Taft, Luling, Avondale, and then reconnect with the River Queen Line at MSY after going over the Huey P. That would be great for plant workers. I can only imagine how many people in BR would take that to avoid sitting in Bridge traffic trying to get home from Dow.


All of that would be awesome and hopefully by 2050 will be a reality. Once the train is approved and if it works expansion will be easy. The track already exists and if the river line (as you called it) is relieving traffic and making commuting easier for south BR and AP commuters than the east BR and LP commuters will want it. Same thing with the commuters on the northshore wanting to go to NOLA. With SELA Louisiana's geography problems of massive river, wetlands, and poor soil roads will never be able to keep up. The only problem with your plan is that there is no railraod connecting mid-city Br to downtown Laffy and no railroad connecting Slidell and Hammond (atleast from what I can see on google maps) but all the other track already exists so it would just have to be upgraded which is much cheaper than building interstate or loops.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:17 am to
quote:

We don't just need passenger rail or interstate improvements, we need both, a loop, and massive surface street improvements. We need to be throwing a TON of money at infrastructure, but instead, we're barely (as in "not even") maintaining current obligations and pillaging the highway fund for everything not related to highway construction.


Based on our limited interaction on the pt board, I am sure we will disagree on this, but here is what I think we need to do to increase funding and improve efficiency of government maintaining infastrucutre.
Step1: Replace the federal gas tax with a mileage tax that must be paid when you get your annual inspection sticker. The current method of paying by the gallon is obsolete because of hybrids and high mileage cars get such good gas mileage they are not paying their fair share.
Step2: Have each state add a hybrid or high mileage fee to make up decreased fuel tax on the state level. There is no fair way to decide what miles were driven in which state to pay the taxes so just a $50-$100 fee to drive a car that gets better than X amount of mgg for its weight.
Step3: Get government out of it as much as possible. Private or public private companies can maintain and build new infastrucuture much more efficently than a public entitiy.
Step4: build BRT (cheaper than streetcars so I prefer BRT) in BR and NOLA so that movement inside the city is much easier.
Step5: Bid out the everday operations of CATS and the railroad to private companies so EBR voters and their elected officials are not in charge of running it.
Posted by brodeo
Member since Feb 2013
1850 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:19 am to
quote:

The only problem with your plan is that there is no railraod connecting mid-city Br to downtown Laffy and no railroad connecting Slidell and Hammond (atleast from what I can see on google maps) but all the other track already exists so it would just have to be upgraded which is much cheaper than building interstate or loops.


You're right about downtown Laffy. There would have to be a rail line built from Opelousas to Lafayette because the tracks that once connected them no longer exist.

The same is true from Hammond to Slidell. Those tracks are now the Tammany Trace walking and biking trail.

Basically, it would just mean that at first, the oil express wouldn't have a Lafayette stop and that the northshore line would turn at Hammond and end at La Place instead of continuing on to Slidell. Then, once the lines to Covington and Slidell are complete, the Northshore line and Ponchetrain express can be completed.
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3206 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:21 am to
Using rail instead of road to get to/from LSU on gameday would be huge. If people are able to leave the game and be downtown in 15-20 minutes, regardless of traffic, the experiences of visiting guests would improve immensely (translation: more money spent in downtown bars/clubs/restaurants).
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45560 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:24 am to
quote:

You're right about downtown Laffy. There would have to be a rail line built from Opelousas to Lafayette because the tracks that once connected them no longer exist.

The same is true from Hammond to Slidell. Those tracks are now the Tammany Trace walking and biking trail.

Basically, it would just mean that at first, the oil express wouldn't have a Lafayette stop and that the northshore line would turn at Hammond and end at La Place instead of continuing on to Slidell. Then, once the lines to Covington and Slidell are complete, the Northshore line and Ponchetrain express can be completed.


Those could all be done I was just pointing out that there currently isn't track. The river line could also be expanded to north BR (so we aren't racist) and the BR airport to help improve connectivity. There is potential for a world class commuter rail network in SELA, but with the corrupt and inept politicans and a population that has no desire to plan for the future we will probably never see it.
Posted by brodeo
Member since Feb 2013
1850 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Step1: Replace the federal gas tax with a mileage tax that must be paid when you get your annual inspection sticker. The current method of paying by the gallon is obsolete because of hybrids and high mileage cars get such good gas mileage they are not paying their fair share.


Disagree, but I would not be opposed to increasing the gas tax. The biggest issue isn't cars getting better milage or inflation of currency, the biggest issue is transportation funds not going to transportation. In order to get federal highway funds, the only thing the feds care about is safety, not reducing congestion. They also spend tons of money on "greenways" and "road diets" which are nice projects but they should not be funded with money supposed to go to improving interstates.

The issue isn't that there isn't enough money (especially at the federal level), it's that the money isn't being spent on what it was designed for. At the state level, the funds are massively misused AND there's not enough money even if they weren't.

quote:

Step2: Have each state add a hybrid or high mileage fee to make up decreased fuel tax on the state level. There is no fair way to decide what miles were driven in which state to pay the taxes so just a $50-$100 fee to drive a car that gets better than X amount of mgg for its weight.


Disagree.

quote:

Step3: Get government out of it as much as possible. Private or public private companies can maintain and build new infastrucuture much more efficently than a public entitiy.
Step4: build BRT (cheaper than streetcars so I prefer BRT) in BR and NOLA so that movement inside the city is much easier.
Step5: Bid out the everday operations of CATS and the railroad to private companies so EBR voters and their elected officials are not in charge of running it.


Agree with the rest. A lot of the issues with rail stem from the fact that the government regulates that industry so heavily, creating massive regional monopolies that stifle innovation, improvements, and competition. With interstates, the biggest hurdles are real estate (they take up a lot of room) and Wetlands mitigation (the uninhabited routes are basically regulated out of feasibility). By waving much of the mitigation costs to build interstates, it would cut the cost of a loop to just a fraction of what it currently is projected because it will be able to route itself through inexpensive property in undeveloped areas (like in the wetlands around Bayou Manchac, west of LA 1, and the Amite River)
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78409 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 10:41 am to
quote:

the biggest issue is transportation funds not going to transportation.


We spend almost 4x on roads and bridges than we bring in from gas tax. The money is making it there, just not enough.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42636 posts
Posted on 7/15/15 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Demand exists. LSU students going downtown to party.


So we do good on weekend nights.

quote:

People who desire to take advantage of the massive amounts of parking downtown to get to LSU games,


They can do that now and ride the bus.

quote:

LSU students who live downtown,


Very few students can afford to live downtown. Some do, but not that many.

quote:

LSU students and workers who live near Brightside.


They use the buses now.

quote:

That's just one part of the system that will eventually connect much of the rest of the city, allowing those in Mid City, Old Goodwood, and St. George to be able to come to LSU via light rail instead of endless gridlock.


Not in the next decade.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram