- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dayton, OH bar mass shooting - 10 dead, 27 wounded
Posted on 8/4/19 at 5:44 pm to Clames
Posted on 8/4/19 at 5:44 pm to Clames
quote:
I'm definitely looking into desktop CNC mills, I'll mill my own from 80% lowers and eventually solid billets. Technology has made gun-control a losing venture
A $300 3D printer will do the job too.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 5:50 pm to CarRamrod
quote:It looks like a low budget frankin-gun that some guy put together in his garage and then sold online.
such a budget lower.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 6:00 pm to philabuck
The little shite used a makeshift firearm.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 6:01 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
None of you will get the reference.
Is Buckeye banned?
Posted on 8/4/19 at 6:28 pm to TigerBait1971
From his mother's Facebook-
Malala Fund
US 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Organization
Malala and Ziauddin Yousafzai founded Malala Fund in 2013 to champion every girl’s right to 12 years of free, safe, quality education. Together our board, leadership council, staff, and champions are creating a more equal world by making sure all girls can go to school.
Malala Fund works in regions where the most girls miss out on secondary education. Our priority countries are Afghanistan, Brazil, India, Lebanon, Nigeria, Pakistan and Turkey.
With more than 130 million girls out of school today, here’s how we’re breaking down barriers that hold girls back.
1. Investing in local education activists
Through our Gulmakai Network, we invest in local educators and advocates — the people who best understand girls in their communities — in regions where the most girls are missing out on secondary school.
2. Advocating to hold leaders accountable
We advocate — at local, national and international levels — for resources and policy changes needed to give all girls a secondary education. The girls we serve have high goals for themselves — and we have high expectations for leaders who can help them.
3. Amplifying girls’ voices
We believe girls should speak for themselves and tell leaders what they need to learn and achieve their potential. We amplify girls’ voices and share their stories through Assembly, our digital publication and newsletter.
LINK
Malala Fund
US 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Organization
Malala and Ziauddin Yousafzai founded Malala Fund in 2013 to champion every girl’s right to 12 years of free, safe, quality education. Together our board, leadership council, staff, and champions are creating a more equal world by making sure all girls can go to school.
Malala Fund works in regions where the most girls miss out on secondary education. Our priority countries are Afghanistan, Brazil, India, Lebanon, Nigeria, Pakistan and Turkey.
With more than 130 million girls out of school today, here’s how we’re breaking down barriers that hold girls back.
1. Investing in local education activists
Through our Gulmakai Network, we invest in local educators and advocates — the people who best understand girls in their communities — in regions where the most girls are missing out on secondary school.
2. Advocating to hold leaders accountable
We advocate — at local, national and international levels — for resources and policy changes needed to give all girls a secondary education. The girls we serve have high goals for themselves — and we have high expectations for leaders who can help them.
3. Amplifying girls’ voices
We believe girls should speak for themselves and tell leaders what they need to learn and achieve their potential. We amplify girls’ voices and share their stories through Assembly, our digital publication and newsletter.
LINK
Posted on 8/4/19 at 6:55 pm to Korin
Yep. Wonder how long it takes and how it will happen
Posted on 8/4/19 at 7:06 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
6.5% of our population commits 50% of all murders. It's actually a much smaller number than that when you take into account that they are mostly ages 15-35.
It’s even smaller when you realize that not all members of that group are murderers.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 7:20 pm to Jake88
quote:
Waht? From 2017...
"The NRA has donated a paltry $3,533,294 to all current members of Congress since 1998, according to The Washington Post,
Seriously? Direct donations are pennies. They spend hundreds of millions and even more through the PAC.
quote:
In 2016 the NRA raised a record $366 million and spent $412 million for political activities. The NRA also maintains a PAC which is excluded from these figures.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 7:24 pm to ashy larry
quote:
They spend hundreds of millions and even more through the PAC
Any documentation on where these hundreds of millions were spent?
Spending money on "political activities" isnt lobbying alone.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 9:12 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
I feel like we're about to hit critical mass on this shite. frick these guys for the horror they're responsible for and frick them again for what's about to happen to decent law abiding American gun owners because of them.
Taking guns away isn’t the solution anyway. If a crazy person wants to do mass damage he or she could just as easily run a truck through a mass crowd.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 10:56 pm to Athos
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/5/19 at 11:04 pm
Posted on 8/4/19 at 11:23 pm to Kaybaby82
quote:yeah man
These kind of actions have been going on since the beginning of time. To think this is something new you’d have to be a fool or living under the ocean.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 11:54 pm to Clames
Speaking of being simple minded and not looking up data for yourself... you graph represents larger numbers but our gun laws are not truly national. They vary state by state so let’s look at the numbers on a state by state level...
SPOILER: States with more permissive gun laws and greater gun ownership had higher rates of mass shootings, and a growing divide appears to be emerging between restrictive and permissive states. (Sorry for those of you who don’t like or want real research of facts on the issue.)
Citation (worth a read before you argue or down vote) for the research recently coming out of Columbia: LINK
SPOILER: States with more permissive gun laws and greater gun ownership had higher rates of mass shootings, and a growing divide appears to be emerging between restrictive and permissive states. (Sorry for those of you who don’t like or want real research of facts on the issue.)
Citation (worth a read before you argue or down vote) for the research recently coming out of Columbia: LINK
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:00 am to IllegalPete
But there is data showing gun legislation CAN make a difference. Don’t give up so quickly. :)
CITATION AND CONTENT:
State gun laws, gun ownership, and mass shootings in the US: cross sectional time series
Accepted 28 January 2019
Abstract
Objective To determine whether restrictiveness-permissiveness of state gun laws or gun ownership are associated with mass shootings in the US.
Design Cross sectional time series.
Setting and population US gun owners from 1998-2015.
Exposure An annual rating between 0 (completely restrictive) and 100 (completely permissive) for the gun laws of all 50 states taken from a reference guide for gun owners traveling between states from 1998 to 2015. Gun ownership was estimated annually as the percentage of suicides committed with firearms in each state.
Main outcome measure Mass shootings were defined as independent events in which four or more people were killed by a firearm. Data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Uniform Crime Reporting System from 1998-2015 were used to calculate annual rates of mass shootings in each state. Mass shooting events and rates were further separated into those where the victims were immediate family members or partners (domestic) and those where the victims had other relationships with the perpetrator (non-domestic).
Results Fully adjusted regression analyses showed that a 10 unit increase in state gun law permissiveness was associated with a significant 11.5% (95% confidence interval 4.2% to 19.3%, P=0.002) higher rate of mass shootings. A 10% increase in state gun ownership was associated with a significant 35.1% (12.7% to 62.7%, P=0.001) higher rate of mass shootings. Partially adjusted regression analyses produced similar results, as did analyses restricted to domestic and non-domestic mass shootings.
Conclusions States with more permissive gun laws and greater gun ownership had higher rates of mass shootings, and a growing divide appears to be emerging between restrictive and permissive states.
CITATION AND CONTENT:
State gun laws, gun ownership, and mass shootings in the US: cross sectional time series
Accepted 28 January 2019
Abstract
Objective To determine whether restrictiveness-permissiveness of state gun laws or gun ownership are associated with mass shootings in the US.
Design Cross sectional time series.
Setting and population US gun owners from 1998-2015.
Exposure An annual rating between 0 (completely restrictive) and 100 (completely permissive) for the gun laws of all 50 states taken from a reference guide for gun owners traveling between states from 1998 to 2015. Gun ownership was estimated annually as the percentage of suicides committed with firearms in each state.
Main outcome measure Mass shootings were defined as independent events in which four or more people were killed by a firearm. Data from the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Uniform Crime Reporting System from 1998-2015 were used to calculate annual rates of mass shootings in each state. Mass shooting events and rates were further separated into those where the victims were immediate family members or partners (domestic) and those where the victims had other relationships with the perpetrator (non-domestic).
Results Fully adjusted regression analyses showed that a 10 unit increase in state gun law permissiveness was associated with a significant 11.5% (95% confidence interval 4.2% to 19.3%, P=0.002) higher rate of mass shootings. A 10% increase in state gun ownership was associated with a significant 35.1% (12.7% to 62.7%, P=0.001) higher rate of mass shootings. Partially adjusted regression analyses produced similar results, as did analyses restricted to domestic and non-domestic mass shootings.
Conclusions States with more permissive gun laws and greater gun ownership had higher rates of mass shootings, and a growing divide appears to be emerging between restrictive and permissive states.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:18 am to MobileLegend5
People are fricking insane these days. Only Springfield Models 1861 should be legal. Anything more automatic than that should be banned and people caught with anything more automatic than that given a mandatory 10 year prison term. shite would change real fast, real soon.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:20 am to TaTa Toothy
Possessing a handgun would be a mandatory 15 years.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 5:13 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
The NRA hardly lobbies at all. So this is just a lie.
And to think that people who believe this fricking vote...
Posted on 8/5/19 at 5:50 am to TaTa Toothy
Yes, things would change very fast. There’d be a civil war for starters; and you would, mercifully, be dead.
Popular
Back to top


0









