- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Day care worker pleads no contest in 2010 death of infant
Posted on 8/14/15 at 12:52 pm to DaTroof
Posted on 8/14/15 at 12:52 pm to DaTroof
quote:You think shaking a baby until its brain hemorrhages is just a "stupid mistake". Locking my keys in the house is a stupid mistake... not this.
an incredibly stupid mistake
This post was edited on 8/14/15 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 8/14/15 at 12:53 pm to DaTroof
quote:
show me someone who's never made an incredibly stupid mistake and I'll show you a liar.
So, when did you shake a child to death? Or make a mistake on that level?
Posted on 8/14/15 at 12:56 pm to GRTiger
I like how it's assumed that the only possible way this kind of trauma can possibly happen is by picking the baby up and violently shaking it. Accidents happen, the kid should not have been sent to a day care at 2 months old.
Posted on 8/14/15 at 12:57 pm to ManBearTiger
quote:WTF?
the kid should not have been sent to a day care at 2 months old.
Posted on 8/14/15 at 12:57 pm to GRTiger
quote:
shake a child to death
If there was proof that this is what happened then she would be in prison and I wouldn't have any problem with it. A judge that is much smarter than you and I about the facts in this case made the call to put her on probation. This was very likely due to the lack of proof that she intentionally killed the child.
This post was edited on 8/14/15 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 8/14/15 at 12:57 pm to DaTroof
I'll respectfully disagree.
She didn't intend to kill the child, but she intended to cause harm.
ETA To elaborate, the death was an accident. The harm caused as a result of the shaking was not. She should have been jailed if the child survived.
She didn't intend to kill the child, but she intended to cause harm.
ETA To elaborate, the death was an accident. The harm caused as a result of the shaking was not. She should have been jailed if the child survived.
This post was edited on 8/14/15 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 8/14/15 at 12:58 pm to CaptainsWafer
And you have absolutely no evidence of that, and apparently there is none.
This is an emotional case, but really sending a girl to prison isn't going to solve anything or bring closure to anyone.
This is an emotional case, but really sending a girl to prison isn't going to solve anything or bring closure to anyone.
This post was edited on 8/14/15 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 8/14/15 at 12:59 pm to ManBearTiger
quote:
I like how it's assumed
How do you define "assume?" I am basing my posts on the professional opinion of a medical examiner.
quote:
The doctor said it was “more likely than not” that Brody’s injuries resulted from being shaken.
quote:
the kid should not have been sent to a day care at 2 months old.
I really need you to explain what exactly this means.
Posted on 8/14/15 at 1:00 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I really need you to explain what exactly this means.
If you need that sentence explained, you should probably look into English as a Second Language courses.
Posted on 8/14/15 at 1:00 pm to DaTroof
quote:
Parents unintentionally leave their children in cars too.
They do? Really?
If so, they are shitty parents
This post was edited on 8/14/15 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 8/14/15 at 1:01 pm to DaTroof
quote:It was a plea deal... the judge then signs off on the recommendation. It's only a formality. Don't try and hide behind the judge on this.
A judge that is very likely much smarter than you and I about the facts in this case made the call to put her on probation. This was very likely due to the lack of proof that she intentionally killed the child.
Posted on 8/14/15 at 1:01 pm to CaptainsWafer
quote:
the death was an accident. The harm caused as a result of the shaking was not
But the harm caused was death. Your statement is contradictory and your argument is invalid.
Posted on 8/14/15 at 1:02 pm to DaTroof
quote:
This was very likely due to the lack of proof that she intentionally killed the child
No shite. We are not in a position to sentence this pig, so we have the ability to form an opinion that is not beholden to the standards of the courts (eg beyond doubt). Explain how this could happen if not some act of physical abuse. And remember, the excuse has to be something a doctor would not be able to determine.
Posted on 8/14/15 at 1:03 pm to ManBearTiger
Many families do not have any other option outside of daycare. And I'm not talking about just poor families either.
Posted on 8/14/15 at 1:04 pm to ManBearTiger
It was actually a way for you to back away from the absolutely asinine implications of your dumbass statement.
If the daycare set the age for accepting kids at 2 months, than should be able to keep the two month old alive, you stupid stupid mother fricker.
If the daycare set the age for accepting kids at 2 months, than should be able to keep the two month old alive, you stupid stupid mother fricker.
Posted on 8/14/15 at 1:05 pm to ManBearTiger
quote:You seem to know this girl. So how did it really happen?
the only possible way this kind of trauma can possibly happen is by picking the baby up and violently shaking it. Accidents happen
Posted on 8/14/15 at 1:05 pm to Slinky
I remember this thread here.....and that pic
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/o-t-lounge/everyone-please-keep-my-friend-and-his-wife-in-your-prayers-today/28034926/
Terrible. Absolutely terrible.
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/o-t-lounge/everyone-please-keep-my-friend-and-his-wife-in-your-prayers-today/28034926/
quote:
she put Brody back in his car seat and tried to give the dad (my friend) the body. bitch tried to pass it off like he did it
he was only 6 weeks old and my friends only blood child (step daughter with the wife)
Terrible. Absolutely terrible.
This post was edited on 8/14/15 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 8/14/15 at 1:09 pm to DaTroof
quote:
This is such a tough case. If this was indeed an accident and there was true remorse I'm not sure prison is the way to go. People automatically think that putting someone in prison is the best way to handle everything. The worker didn't intentionally kill the child. It was an accident. Yes, she is negligent, but putting her in prison isn't going to bring the child back. A sad and terrible situation and I wouldn't want to be the judge in this case. We all make mistakes. This was obviously a huge mistake that this worker will have nightmares about her whole life. That's a mental prison I don't want to be in.
She shook a baby to death
Posted on 8/14/15 at 1:10 pm to ell_13
quote:
You seem to know this girl. So how did it really happen?
I'm not claiming to know what happened, just pointing out that none of us do and to assume the worst is assinine given the judge's decision. My panties are totally unwadded, yours seem to be soaked in impotent rage piss because you're baselessly assuming this was a malicious act.
Posted on 8/14/15 at 1:11 pm to Rox
quote:
apparently he was dead when he picked him up from daycare.
She put a dead kid in his car seat and handed the dad what he thought was his sleeping baby. Hey, accidents happen.
Popular
Back to top


0






