- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/9/24 at 11:57 am to Cajun Tifoso
quote:
There will be riots. Christmas is right around the corner.
Wonder who to contact to pick me up an 85" TV?
Posted on 12/9/24 at 11:57 am to MattA
quote:
Could have been the jury’s way of saying frick you to the DA and the Judge.
But why would someone who previously held out and wanted to convict him of manslaughter want to say frick you to the DA and judge?
Posted on 12/9/24 at 11:59 am to MattA
quote:
frick you to the DA
Something has to be done about these activist DA's.
They frick up peoples lives and there is zero penalty.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:00 pm to Joshjrn
Because of the dropping of the more serious charge to better the odds of getting a conviction. Some of them probably sniffed out what was going on and didn’t appreciate the shenanigans. The “guilty” ones were then persuaded otherwise. Just my opinion for what it’s worth
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:01 pm to RogerTheShrubber
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/11/26 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:03 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Well this DA really, really pissed off Trump, so I think Alvin is about to pay.
Progressives tend to fall upwards, theyre doing what they were put in office to do.
I have little faith there this will hurt they guy.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:04 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
The long deliberation and deadlock on the manslaughter followed by a very short deliberation and a unanimous not guilty verdict on a lesser/included is… odd.
Maybe.
Or it could simply be that they considered the vast majority of what they needed to consider the first time around.
When you think about it, there's only one real question. Were the self-defense actions taken by Penny appropriate or excessive?
They deliberated that the first time around.
The second time all they had to to was examine the new charge to see if it changed their reasoning from the first time.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:05 pm to Kcrad
quote:quote:
I was hoping this would not happen…
You would rather an innocent man go to prison? Interesting take.
How does his hoping idiotic "demonstrations: don't happen equate to wanting an innocent man to go to prison?
I was hoping he would be acquitted AND BLM and others would start their idiocy.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:05 pm to RLDSC FAN
YAHOO
If BLM starts rioting get the fire hoses out
F WOKE
If BLM starts rioting get the fire hoses out
F WOKE
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:07 pm to RLDSC FAN
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/11/26 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:07 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:quote:
I was hoping this would not happen…
Why?
Does no one look at what someone responded to? He was hoping BLM and others would not have these idiotic protests. Were you hoping they would?
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:08 pm to mdomingue
quote:
Does no one look at what someone responded to? He was hoping BLM and others would not have these idiotic protests. Were you hoping they would?
Looked like she was angry Penny was set free.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:09 pm to mdomingue
quote:
Does no one look at what someone responded to?
Usually not when the responded to portion isn't quoted.
This board goes by fast.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:09 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
"people wanna jump up and choke us and kill us for being loud"
well.....that's a bit disingenuous.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:11 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
while only like 10% think that Daniel is.
Might be a high number.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:11 pm to Kcrad
quote:
I was hoping this would not happen…
You would rather an innocent man go to prison? Interesting take.
Apparently.
I dont think anyone cares if BLM riots now. Their 15 minutes has passed.
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:11 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
Maybe. Or it could simply be that they considered the vast majority of what they needed to consider the first time around. When you think about it, there's only one real question. Were the self-defense actions taken by Penny appropriate or excessive? They deliberated that the first time around. The second time all they had to to was examine the new charge to see if it changed their reasoning from the first time.
But not really. They couldn’t reach a verdict on the manslaughter, which means people left that room still voting for guilty. Those guilty votes then came back in and voted not guilty to a less serious charge. That’s odd, outside of them deciding that they were ready to go home so just went with the majority.
This post was edited on 12/9/24 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 12/9/24 at 12:13 pm to MattA
quote:
Because of the dropping of the more serious charge to better the odds of getting a conviction. Some of them probably sniffed out what was going on and didn’t appreciate the shenanigans. The “guilty” ones were then persuaded otherwise. Just my opinion for what it’s worth
Maybe. I don’t really think of it that way as massaging charges is very common. Hell, in Louisiana, they could deliberate them simultaneously from the start. But I appreciate that a non attorney might view it differently.
Popular
Back to top


2





