- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cruise passenger jumps into ocean from balcony to amuse friends.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 11:31 am to UGATiger26
Posted on 1/17/19 at 11:31 am to UGATiger26
quote:
I bet emergency services were contacted immediately, crew scrambling, etc. etc.
Wouldn't these emergency crews already be employed on the ship and on the clock? What is the extra cost here? It's not like they were on the open water and had to deploy boats or something using gas, it was docked and he could swim to shore
Posted on 1/17/19 at 11:38 am to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
If he caused thousands of dollars to his stateroom I'd assume they would just add it to his bill like any hotel does.
Could be. What if he cancels his credit card before they can charge it?
quote:
But say they were in the Bahamas docked(like they were in this situation) and instead he assaulted a guest while on board. Does he get charged by the country he is in, or does he get brought back to the US and charged?
I'm not a legal expert, so I don't know. But this would be a civil case filed by the cruise line against the individual. Not a criminal one, so it doesn't really matter what the criminal implications are. You don't have to commit a crime in order to be sued.
This post was edited on 1/17/19 at 11:39 am
Posted on 1/17/19 at 11:39 am to UGATiger26
quote:
I'm not a legal expert, so I don't know.
and the sea will tell....
Posted on 1/17/19 at 11:40 am to UGATiger26
Screw Royal Caribbean.
This guy would have been a court jester back in medieval teams. He was born a few hundred years too late.
I, for one, approve of his act solely because the first time I saw it I laughed my arse off. If he died then who cares, he’s an idiot.
This guy would have been a court jester back in medieval teams. He was born a few hundred years too late.
I, for one, approve of his act solely because the first time I saw it I laughed my arse off. If he died then who cares, he’s an idiot.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 11:43 am to UGATiger26
quote:I'm not either, which is why I asked. However if you know this would be a civil case, why would you try to compare it to criminal situations like assault and destruction of property? The only reason I ask you about the assault in the first place was because you said this
I'm not a legal expert, so I don't know. But this would be a civil case filed by the cruise line against the individual. Not a criminal one, so it doesn't really matter what the criminal implications are.
quote:
Would you be asking the same thing if the passenger had caused thousands of dollars worth of damage to his stateroom or assaulted a member of the crew?
This post was edited on 1/17/19 at 11:45 am
Posted on 1/17/19 at 11:50 am to lsupride87
quote:
So yes its a serious question. Exactly what are they suing for? What are their damages?
Don’t you hear about every single person that goes overboard? What about every time a stomach bug goes through a ship?
The news media plasters the cruise ship and line’s name all over the place for days. Each time there is damage to the company’s image. The company has a right to protect that image. Stories like this are damaging monetarily,
Posted on 1/17/19 at 11:52 am to tonydtigr
I like how they wouldn’t let him reboard the ship and told him to find his own way home.

Posted on 1/17/19 at 11:55 am to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
, why would you try to compare it to criminal situations like assault and destruction of property?
Because you can be sued for both of those things.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:00 pm to UGATiger26
quote:
The moment it was reported to the crew that someone fell from the ship, I bet emergency services were contacted immediately, crew scrambling, etc. etc.
If I remember correctly, the ships actually have devices that detect man overboard situations automatically, so I am sure when he fell the ship went into emergency response mode.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:05 pm to UGATiger26
I understand that. Some said they were seeking legal action against him. I ask how that works considering they weren't in the US or any of it's territory. I wasn't implying that he can't be sued because it didn't happen in the US. I was asking whether the legal action taken against him has to be done in the country the alleged action took place, or the country of origin of both parties. It was a simple law question about jurisdiction.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:12 pm to tonydtigr
quote:
by Michael Bartiromo
No Maria, no care
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:14 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
This guy sis a dumbass.
Is this a new gender thing?
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:15 pm to DuckManiak
quote:
quote: “He’s jumped from those kind[s] of heights before, and we didn’t really care about the consequences with the cruise company,” said Konstantin Kryachun, the friend who filmed the jump. “We just wanted to get a video of it and make it go viral.”
And if it does, any proceeds from it should be given to the Cruise Line as compensation.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:17 pm to OKellsBells
quote:
I like how they wouldn’t let him reboard the ship and told him to find his own way home.
quote:
The cruise line also informed local police, though Naydev told Fox 13 that they declined to press charges, because “fortunately the police thought the whole situation was amusing.”
They tried to get him thrown in Bahamian jail. Those cops probably asked to see the video.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:22 pm to NOFOX
I wouldn't be surprised if there is some small print you agree to when you purchase tickets and/or board the ship that allows the cruise company to sue.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:22 pm to tonydtigr
Someday, somewhere, his last words will be "Hey y'all, watch this!"
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:27 pm to NOFOX
I don’t blame the cruise line for taking a hard stance on this. It would be very disruptive and dangerous if it became a fad.
Frick vacationing on a cruise ship though.
Frick vacationing on a cruise ship though.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:29 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
I understand that. Some said they were seeking legal action against him. I ask how that works considering they weren't in the US or any of it's territory. I wasn't implying that he can't be sued because it didn't happen in the US. I was asking whether the legal action taken against him has to be done in the country the alleged action took place, or the country of origin of both parties. It was a simple law question about jurisdiction.
I see what you're saying. When the article said the cruise line was pursuing legal action, it sounds like they mean civilly, not criminally.
Because this was also in the article:
quote:
The cruise line also informed local police, though Naydev told Fox 13 that they declined to press charges, because “fortunately the police thought the whole situation was amusing.”
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:38 pm to tonydtigr
Too bad Royal Caribbean couldn't amuse the rest of the ship by intentionally leaving him in Mexico.
Posted on 1/17/19 at 12:40 pm to UGATiger26
Ahh. Thank you. So it looks like they tried to press criminal charges in the Bahamas and they laughed at them.
If it is civil charges now then they can file them in the US(if my understanding of the law is correct). Still would be a silly case. What damages could they really be seeking? I don't think the article title "Idiot guy jumps 100ft off Cruise ship to "send it"" is going to have a profound impact on their reputation.
If it is civil charges now then they can file them in the US(if my understanding of the law is correct). Still would be a silly case. What damages could they really be seeking? I don't think the article title "Idiot guy jumps 100ft off Cruise ship to "send it"" is going to have a profound impact on their reputation.
Popular
Back to top


0









