Started By
Message

re: Crazy stats on the size of the U.S. Navy by January 1945

Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:22 am to
Posted by concrete_tiger
Member since May 2020
5991 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:22 am to
Just recently, our family was on the USS Wisconsin at the same time my mom & dad were on the Missouri, and we were texting photos. We both agreed they feel like they could still kick some arse. Freaking impressive what people can put together when needed.

Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29451 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 9:26 am to
quote:

I had a great grandmother who lived to be 103 years old. She was born in 1867 and died in 1971. When she was a little girl her family was attacked and killed by Indians during a migration after the Civil War. She and her brother were spared. Before she died she sat in an air conditioned room with a television set and watched NASA engineers use computers to direct the moon landing.

Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29439 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Try 1902 first fight stays in the air for 12 seconds.
67 years later we land two men on the moon and bring them back home safely.
Yep, absolutely incredible.
Posted by DomincDecoco
of no fixed abode
Member since Oct 2018
10870 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

One happened, the other is purely speculation.


do you cherry pic this strategy (maybe / maybe not) or is it applied to every accomplishment of humanity of the last 100 years?
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31495 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

1902 first airplane. 40 years later landing planes on ships. Pretty impressive technology leap.



I was just thinking about how far we've come in so many ways, since the Great Depression and wondering (not to get political) how (why) the F the current forces that be have is on the brink.
Posted by MSUDawg98
Ravens Flock
Member since Jan 2018
10023 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

1902 first airplane. 40 years later landing planes on ships. Pretty impressive technology leap.
Doolittle played a huge part of the playoffs we made in the late 20s-30s. It's easy to look back and forget there were a lot of DOD types who dismissed the importance of naval aircraft.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa
Member since Aug 2012
13536 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

PRC has been building like crazy.




Here are examples of Chinese goods.








Posted by NewbombII
Member since Nov 2014
4681 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 7:21 pm to
We had three sizes of carriers CV's the big boys, CVL's carrier Light on Cruiser keels and the small one CVE escort carriers.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36021 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 7:38 pm to
quote:


Japanese were done after Midwsy..



FIFY
Posted by WWII Collector
Member since Oct 2018
6994 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

I had a great grandmother who lived to be 103 years old. She was born in 1867 and died in 1971. When she was a little girl her family was attacked and killed by Indians during a migration after the Civil War. She and her brother were spared. Before she died she sat in an air conditioned room with a television set and watched NASA engineers use computers to direct the moon landing.

That's crazy. Think of everything that happened in her lifetime. I don't think many humans have ever witnessed the amount of change and progress she saw.


amazing...
Posted by Eightballjacket
Member since Jan 2016
7314 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

f, if we landed on the moon, we’d have gone back by now I think.

Yep and get all that helium 3 up there
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41187 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

1902 first airplane. 40 years later landing planes on ships. Pretty impressive technology leap.


landing on the moon 67 years later is more impressive IMO
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98182 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:08 pm to
quote:

Shows how meaningless Pearl Harbor was from Japan’s perspective. Even if Japan succeeded and wiped out the entire US fleet at Pearl Harbor it would have been easily replaced quickly.


Bag the carriers at Pearl Harbor and there's no Coral Sea, no Midway. No Guadalcanal. Japan takes New Guinea and invades Australia or forces it into an armistice. It may not affect the ultimate outcome, but the war may last into 46 or 47 and ends with Japan's incineration in a rain of atomic bombs.

Germany may be the big beneficiary. The Pacific gets America's full attention and Britain has to fend for itself. With Japan unchecked, Stalin has to keep substantial forces pinned down in the Far East. The war in Europe stalemates until Britain or Germany develop, or Russia steals, a bomb of their own.
Posted by WWII Collector
Member since Oct 2018
6994 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:26 pm to
jus cause...

Escort Carrier... USS Nassau









This ship landed the First Wave at Omaha.. The 16th Regiment. The USS Henrico






and I just found out today that this ship was an Old Banana cargo boat for the Fruit companies, donated to the Navy and War effort.. and it was the one that brought a Great Unkle Home from Italy. the SS Abangarez



Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98182 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:35 pm to
One of my wife's relatives served on the USS Breton, a light carrier that ferried aircraft to and from the war zone. I looked up the ships war diary one time. The thing that struck me was how tedious it must have been. Many entries just said, "steaming as before," or "anchored as before." He only saw combat once, attacked by a kamikaze at Okinawa. It missed. The duty was not without hazard though. He saw more than one fatal flight deck accident. So many of those guys never did anything to make the history books, but without them we don't win the war.
This post was edited on 5/23/22 at 8:37 pm
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
32482 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

The ability to project force across an ocean is something that had arguably never happened in human history.




Are we just going to ignore the British Fleet post-Spanish Armada?


Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
30099 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:41 pm to
During the war, the US built 175 Fletcher class destroyers. Not destroyers total. Just one class of destroyers. Extrapolate that over every type and class and you can see how we got to 61K.

The Axis had absolutely no conception of the industrial might of the United States. Hell, I'm not sure our allies really could grasp how economically and industrially powerful the US was.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43335 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Are we just going to ignore the British Fleet post-Spanish Armada?



Peace time versus War time would be the argument.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37492 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Try 1902 first fight stays in the air for 12 seconds. 67 years later we land two men on the moon and bring them back home safely.


Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43335 posts
Posted on 5/23/22 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

The Axis had absolutely no conception of the industrial might of the United States. Hell, I'm not sure our allies really could grasp how economically and industrially powerful the US was.


Funny enough the highest ranking Admiral in Japan did. And he was ignored.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram