- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: cr1tikal exposes the Berenstein/stain Bears conspiracy (video)
Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:53 pm to dgnx6
Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:53 pm to dgnx6
quote:
It could be no on remembers the lines between vader saying Luke, and I am your father. Because it was such a reveal. People just cut out the, obi wan never told you part
Or it could be that it was always "Luke I am your father" until we crossed into this timeline we're in now.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:54 pm to genro
Then you also have the DJ/production software named after Fruit Loops, Fruity Loops. It is still Fruity Loops (FL Studio now)
Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:57 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:some TV guides....although certainly some TV guide prints would not the strongest of evidence. Other references to the show and the book will say stain, they have not changed either. I am not sure why a movie reference would be exempt but not a toy or a backpack or a lunch box would not be exempt
And as the guy who made the video in the OP discovered, in the TV guides of the time it was written Berenstein, not Berenstain as it is now, making the TV guides time capsules of the Berenstein Event
Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:57 pm to genro
quote:
The spelling was changed, again retroactively
It used to be Fruit Loops. This just doesn't even look right at all.

Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:59 pm to ThePoo
quote:
I am not sure why a movie reference would be exempt but not a toy or a backpack or a lunch box would not be exempt
I'm not sure I agree with his argument either. I think the Berenstein spelling that can be found in some TV guides is supposed to be proof that it used to be Berenstein and this is proof that fell through the cracks. I don't think there is some distinction between what gets to stay and what gets changed.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:00 pm to ThePoo
quote:
I am not sure why a movie reference would be exempt but not a toy or a backpack or a lunch box would not be exempt
The multiverse works in mysterious ways. We're still just coming to grips with the fact that this happened to us. No one fully understands the mechanics of it yet.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:00 pm to musick
quote:
Also, it is actually Interview with THE vampire, not Interview with A Vampire.
These I don't get. It was always interview with the vampire. It's a book.
And the Forrest gump one? Well I think that's a little easier to misinterpret if a not all there gump is saying was or is. But it's life was like a box of chocolates.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:00 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:
Or it could be that it was always "Luke I am your father" until we crossed into this timeline we're in now.
My buddy, a huge star wars nerd, would complain about people saying this incorrectly all the time.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:02 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:
They clearly are. Watch it again. There are two boys who are bummed because they don't want to eat this crappy health cereal they are stuck with until one of them has an epihpany that they can feed it to Mikey.
Clearly you are wrong. They are trying to decide if they would eat it.
And the fact the some people remember it as "hates" disproves your stupid time travel theory.
This post was edited on 5/24/16 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:03 pm to guedeaux
quote:So giving it to Mikey who will eat anything makes perfect sense.
They are trying to decide if they would eat it.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:04 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:
Or it could be that it was always "Luke I am your father" until we crossed into this timeline we're in now.
True, which means that sometime between the 90s and now, the universe was altered.
But my one real explanation on the bears. They did change the name. The son took over in the early 2000s. In that video, there were no archives of publisher sites with either of the book. The latest he found was 2005 with stain. So the parents pass it on and die. Son has all the rights and changes the name.
Or it was always stain.
This post was edited on 5/24/16 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:06 pm to dgnx6
Except that people still have their old original books and those have changed too
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:07 pm to genro
quote:
So giving it to Mikey who will eat anything makes perfect sense.
I would be more trusting of someone liking something who normally doesnt like anything than I would a human dumpster liking it.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:08 pm to guedeaux
quote:
Clearly you are wrong. They are trying to decide if they would eat it.
I don't see how you could get that from the commercial. They've clearly already decided they don't want to eat it. They're grossed out by the very concept of it.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:09 pm to dgnx6
quote:
The latest he found was 2005 with stain. So the parents pass it on and die. Son has all the rights and changes the name.
I follow your logic, but my retired schoolteacher mother has an attic full of them that all say "stain". So either they were all changed retroactively, or we migrated to a universe where it has always been "stain".
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:10 pm to genro
quote:
Except that people still have their old original books and those have changed too
I just did some reading and you have people saying they have books with stein. So some people are just lying.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:10 pm to flyAU
Why would he eat it if he hates everything?
Anyways it's not about which one is a more logical commercial.
And again I remember human dumpsters being called "Mikey" because of the commercial.
Anyways it's not about which one is a more logical commercial.
And again I remember human dumpsters being called "Mikey" because of the commercial.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:10 pm to Cooter Davenport
I used to teach World Geography and I can assure you that NZ used to be much further North than it currently is.
Also it's Berensteim.
Also it's Berensteim.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:12 pm to Cooter Davenport
quote:really...our only 2 options here?
So either they were all changed retroactively, or we migrated to a universe where it has always been "stain".
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:12 pm to guedeaux
quote:
And the fact the some people remember it as "hates" disproves your stupid time travel theory.
My theory is not time travel. It is multiple universes. And the fact that some people remember him hating it just proves that some of us from the "stein", "Mikey will eat anything" universe somehow came over to your pre-existing "stain", "Mikey hates everything" universe. I wish I could go back.
This post was edited on 5/24/16 at 2:14 pm
Popular
Back to top


2







