Started By
Message

re: cr1tikal exposes the Berenstein/stain Bears conspiracy (video)

Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:53 pm to
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

It could be no on remembers the lines between vader saying Luke, and I am your father. Because it was such a reveal. People just cut out the, obi wan never told you part


Or it could be that it was always "Luke I am your father" until we crossed into this timeline we're in now.
Posted by musick
the internet
Member since Dec 2008
26131 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:54 pm to
Then you also have the DJ/production software named after Fruit Loops, Fruity Loops. It is still Fruity Loops (FL Studio now)
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
61826 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

And as the guy who made the video in the OP discovered, in the TV guides of the time it was written Berenstein, not Berenstain as it is now, making the TV guides time capsules of the Berenstein Event
some TV guides....although certainly some TV guide prints would not the strongest of evidence. Other references to the show and the book will say stain, they have not changed either. I am not sure why a movie reference would be exempt but not a toy or a backpack or a lunch box would not be exempt

Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87738 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

The spelling was changed, again retroactively

It used to be Fruit Loops. This just doesn't even look right at all.


Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

I am not sure why a movie reference would be exempt but not a toy or a backpack or a lunch box would not be exempt


I'm not sure I agree with his argument either. I think the Berenstein spelling that can be found in some TV guides is supposed to be proof that it used to be Berenstein and this is proof that fell through the cracks. I don't think there is some distinction between what gets to stay and what gets changed.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

I am not sure why a movie reference would be exempt but not a toy or a backpack or a lunch box would not be exempt


The multiverse works in mysterious ways. We're still just coming to grips with the fact that this happened to us. No one fully understands the mechanics of it yet.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
91603 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Also, it is actually Interview with THE vampire, not Interview with A Vampire.


These I don't get. It was always interview with the vampire. It's a book.

And the Forrest gump one? Well I think that's a little easier to misinterpret if a not all there gump is saying was or is. But it's life was like a box of chocolates.
Posted by flyAU
Member since Dec 2010
24901 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

Or it could be that it was always "Luke I am your father" until we crossed into this timeline we're in now.



My buddy, a huge star wars nerd, would complain about people saying this incorrectly all the time.
Posted by guedeaux
Member since Jan 2008
13875 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:02 pm to
quote:


They clearly are. Watch it again. There are two boys who are bummed because they don't want to eat this crappy health cereal they are stuck with until one of them has an epihpany that they can feed it to Mikey.


Clearly you are wrong. They are trying to decide if they would eat it.

And the fact the some people remember it as "hates" disproves your stupid time travel theory.
This post was edited on 5/24/16 at 2:04 pm
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62706 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

They are trying to decide if they would eat it.
So giving it to Mikey who will eat anything makes perfect sense.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
91603 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

Or it could be that it was always "Luke I am your father" until we crossed into this timeline we're in now.


True, which means that sometime between the 90s and now, the universe was altered.


But my one real explanation on the bears. They did change the name. The son took over in the early 2000s. In that video, there were no archives of publisher sites with either of the book. The latest he found was 2005 with stain. So the parents pass it on and die. Son has all the rights and changes the name.

Or it was always stain.
This post was edited on 5/24/16 at 2:07 pm
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62706 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:06 pm to
Except that people still have their old original books and those have changed too
Posted by flyAU
Member since Dec 2010
24901 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

So giving it to Mikey who will eat anything makes perfect sense.



I would be more trusting of someone liking something who normally doesnt like anything than I would a human dumpster liking it.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Clearly you are wrong. They are trying to decide if they would eat it.


I don't see how you could get that from the commercial. They've clearly already decided they don't want to eat it. They're grossed out by the very concept of it.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

The latest he found was 2005 with stain. So the parents pass it on and die. Son has all the rights and changes the name.


I follow your logic, but my retired schoolteacher mother has an attic full of them that all say "stain". So either they were all changed retroactively, or we migrated to a universe where it has always been "stain".
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
91603 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Except that people still have their old original books and those have changed too


I just did some reading and you have people saying they have books with stein. So some people are just lying.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62706 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:10 pm to
Why would he eat it if he hates everything?

Anyways it's not about which one is a more logical commercial.

And again I remember human dumpsters being called "Mikey" because of the commercial.
Posted by fouldeliverer
Lannisport
Member since Nov 2008
13538 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:10 pm to
I used to teach World Geography and I can assure you that NZ used to be much further North than it currently is.

Also it's Berensteim.
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
61826 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

So either they were all changed retroactively, or we migrated to a universe where it has always been "stain".

really...our only 2 options here?
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

And the fact the some people remember it as "hates" disproves your stupid time travel theory.


My theory is not time travel. It is multiple universes. And the fact that some people remember him hating it just proves that some of us from the "stein", "Mikey will eat anything" universe somehow came over to your pre-existing "stain", "Mikey hates everything" universe. I wish I could go back.
This post was edited on 5/24/16 at 2:14 pm
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram