Started By
Message

re: Covid19 is now officially a hoax

Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:00 am to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89099 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:00 am to
quote:

We should never have considered destroying our economy for a death rate that low


Can you at least show what the death rate would have been without the distancing measures before you make such a sweeping statement?
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62942 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:00 am to
quote:

to say the virus itself is a hoax simply isn't true


I think most people who throw the term hoax around are saying that the predictions of the severity of the virus were a hoax...not that the virus doesn't actually exist.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
79567 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:00 am to
quote:

sure they are in hospice cause corona



I'll believe the people on the ground, not your tin foil blog sites.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51725 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:01 am to
quote:

In raw numbers, sure. I have no dog in this hunt, but I'm not sure if "three times more deadly than the flu" counts as "barely above" in any practical sense
Depends on initial outlooks, even with those numbers.

In its present form, yes, those are still high numbers in comparison. However, the "flu" is normally widely understood, and an annual vaccine is available that has (in this year) a 45% rate of effectiveness. It fluctuates from year to year.

If you had the 45% effectiveness vaccine available for this virus, that 0.27% - 0.357% would be reduced to 0.15% - 0.2%. Essentially, making it 1.5X to 2X the rate of a normal flu. Still bad, but certainly nowhere near the current "official CDC numbers". Then, you consider that by cutting the rate of those infected by nearly 50%, you also reduce the number of those becoming infected through person-to-person transmission, so you would see further reductions in cases, and potentially bringing this Covid-19 viral infection issue down to the level of a normal flu season. Possibly even lower.

Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
3141 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:06 am to
quote:

I think most people who throw the term hoax around are saying that the predictions of the severity of the virus were a hoax...
Hoaxes are deliberate by definition.

Why, in your opinion, would scientists around the world have deliberately lied about the predicted severity of the viral outbreak?
Posted by BeepNode
Lafayette
Member since Feb 2014
10005 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:06 am to
quote:

this would imply that the actual number of COVID-19 cases in the state of New York is 6.65 million, or about 1/3rd of the state's population


We're only 3 or 4 months into it though. It seems this COVID-19 is at least more contagious.

quote:

If we assume a fatality rate of 1/350,


So, only 300k to 1 million people die a year? No big deal.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
40851 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:06 am to
If flu is 1/1000 and COVID is 3/1000, you still don't shut down the economy.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62942 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Can you at least show what the death rate would have been without the distancing measures before you make such a sweeping statement?



The death rate would be the same unless you are suggesting that healthcare availability would be impacted.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77222 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:09 am to
Is that hot mic real?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89099 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:10 am to
quote:

The death rate would be the same unless you are suggesting that healthcare availability would be impacted.


That absolutely would have happened.
Posted by The Sea Otter
AR-Kansas
Member since Mar 2019
582 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:10 am to
I disagree on the mere fact that we lost John Prine.
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
13769 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:11 am to
quote:

quote:
Can you at least show what the death rate would have been without the distancing measures before you make such a sweeping statement?


The death rate would be the same unless you are suggesting that healthcare availability would be impacted.



Exactly. And hiding in our homes another week, month, three months, whatever is going to change exactly nothing. There are going to be flare ups whenever we open up again. It is time to get back to our lives and carry on. Sweden has it right and will be better off in the long run.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62942 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Hoaxes are deliberate by definition.

Why, in your opinion, would scientists around the world have deliberately lied about the predicted severity of the viral outbreak?



Don't put words in my mouth.

If I wanted to argue that point, I'd point out that I see EVERY DAY people wanting the damage to the economy to continue and for this to be prolonged. This is political, IMO. I don't think this is debatable.

The WHO has proven to act based on political motives. I don't think this is debatable.

Furthermore, I don't think it takes "scientists around the world" to deliberately lie in some sort of grand conspiracy. The studies coming out are examples of scientists doing their thing. Unfortunately for us, assuming these studies are accurate, much of the damage is done.
This post was edited on 4/21/20 at 11:17 am
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89099 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:12 am to
quote:

And hiding in our homes another week, month, three months, whatever is going to change exactly nothing.


How do people still not get what flattening the curve actually accomplishes? You've had almost two months to figure it out
Posted by DomincDecoco
RIP Ronnie fights Thoth’s loafers
Member since Oct 2018
11928 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:13 am to
Posted by DarkDrifter
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2011
5685 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:13 am to
The virus was real. Now the panic, hysteria and social distancing horseshite is where the questions arises and why this feels hoax-ish.
This post was edited on 4/21/20 at 11:17 am
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62942 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:14 am to
quote:

We're only 3 or 4 months into it though. It seems this COVID-19 is at least more contagious.



If the study referenced here is accurate, there are only two possibilities. It's either waaaaaaay more contagious than the flu or it's been here a LOT longer than we realize.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62942 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:15 am to
quote:

That absolutely would have happened.



Can you show the data behind that before making such a sweeping statement?
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216451 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:17 am to
Spot on........
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89099 posts
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Can you show the data behind that before making such a sweeping statement?


Not sure what data will show what happened in the hospitals in NOLA, NYC, etc. But resource availability was almost an issue in these areas even with all the measures.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram