- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Council on Aging director removes herself from client's will
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:23 pm to Steve Lurkel
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:23 pm to Steve Lurkel
quote:
Who actually owns the Rouge collection?
According to LA Secretary of State office
2
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:25 pm to Tiger Prawn
LLC not in good standing?
This post was edited on 4/6/17 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:26 pm to Steve Lurkel
quote:
Who actually owns the Rouge collection? Pretty obvious gravy doesn't have the ability to own or run a business
Gary and an individual named Steven Johnson (I think that's the name I saw earlier while on La Sec of State... or some similar name).
They're not in good standing and have not filed since 4/2016.
ETA: Tiger Prawn for the win.
This post was edited on 4/6/17 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:28 pm to YouAre8Up
quote:we all know it he has never ran for more than a few feet.
Only thing Gravy has ever run is his mouth and to get food.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:30 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
We all know it he has never ran for more than a few feet.
How can you run further than which you can't see?
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:33 pm to drewnbrla
They're not in good standing but still active. That's not uncommon b/c of technicalities and shite. Here's the PUBLIC information. from
SOS Site.
SOS Business Search
SOS Site.
SOS Business Search
This post was edited on 4/6/17 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:43 pm to southernelite
quote:
Did you she ever explain why she filed the suit?
Her filing suit was actually completely logical from an executor standpoint. She's in charge of the estate and the funds in that estate were removed. I can't really blame her for that.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:50 pm to upgrayedd
quote:which proves she believe what she did wasnt worng or unethical. Which is exactly why she should be removed from her position and that organization should receive this new tax money. .
Her filing suit was actually completely logical from an executor standpoint. She's in charge of the estate and the funds in that estate were removed. I can't really blame her for that.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:54 pm to Tiger Prawn
Some of the biggest lolz I can even imagine is thinking about how much Gravy hates Tigerdroppings.
The OT will never stop shredding him. He'll think he's turned some corner and will say something and this board will be there in seconds to tear him apart.
It's so great.
The OT will never stop shredding him. He'll think he's turned some corner and will say something and this board will be there in seconds to tear him apart.
It's so great.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 12:56 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
which proves she believe what she did wasnt worng or unethical. Which is exactly why she should be removed from her position and that organization should receive this new tax money. .
No, it's one of the few things that she's done where there's a legitimate argument that she's acting in the best interest of the beneficiaries. She has no business being the executrix, but her suit is very logical.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:00 pm to mikelbr
Not a very impressive house for someone who has been in charge of "multiple multi-million dollar" businesses
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:00 pm to upgrayedd
quote:No? no? Im not talking about if that was the best route for the executrix. Her acting as the executrix, acting in the best interest of the trust, proves she believed her being the executrix was ethical.
No, it's one of the few things that she's done where there's a legitimate argument that she's acting in the best interest of the beneficiaries. She has no business being the executrix, but her suit is very logical.
Are you going to say no and repeat yourself just as i had to repeat myself?
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:05 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Her filing suit was actually completely logical from an executor standpoint. She's in charge of the estate and the funds in that estate were removed. I can't really blame her for that.
A. She shouldn't have been the executor in the first place.
B. She only refused the money because of the backlash.
C. She's only removing herself as executor because just saying she wasn't going to take the money didn't make her problem go away.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:09 pm to upgrayedd
Do you think she, the EBR Parish C.O.A.,ms Jacson board member and Atty. and the entire elected NBR mob should be fully investigated ?
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:12 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
No? no? Im not talking about if that was the best route for the executrix. Her acting as the executrix, acting in the best interest of the trust, proves she believed her being the executrix was ethical.
I think that fact has already been established
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:12 pm to Deactived
quote:
Gravy did a March. It was inside though to that council meeting. Was supposed to be outside but he lied to the Sterling family to use them as leverage in the meeting
Same one where he threw a fit they made it SRO & wouldn't let him sit down
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:13 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
quote:
Her filing suit was actually completely logical from an executor standpoint. She's in charge of the estate and the funds in that estate were removed. I can't really blame her for that.
quote:
which proves she believe what she did wasnt worng or unethical. Which is exactly why she should be removed from her position and that organization should receive this new tax money.
I don't know how she couldn't realize what she was doing was wrong and unethical. She filed suit because relatives withdrew the money from the bank account. How would she be able to collect her $500/month payment to oversee the trust if the relatives emptied the bank account?
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:15 pm to southernelite
quote:
A. She shouldn't have been the executor in the first place
I know
quote:
B. She only refused the money because of the backlash.
I know
quote:I know
C. She's only removing herself as executor because just saying she wasn't going to take the money didn't make her problem go away.
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:16 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
LLC not in good standing
IIRC that is a pretty cheap fee that's paid once a year, it's been awhile but I think it's under 100.00
Posted on 4/6/17 at 1:20 pm to tickfawtiger
quote:
Do you think she, the EBR Parish C.O.A.,ms Jacson board member and Atty. and the entire elected NBR mob should be fully investigated ?
Absolutely
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News