Started By
Message

re: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ***W.H.O. DECLARES A GLOBAL PANDEMIC***

Posted on 2/29/20 at 9:38 am to
Posted by CivilTiger83
Member since Dec 2017
2525 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 9:38 am to
quote:

The biggest issue with this virus is that it appears to be highly contagious. And it may be deadlier than common flus and other respiratory pathogens. But it's not gonna wipe out the world.


The 1918 pandemic did not wipe out the world. It had a 2.5% mortality rate. It was pretty devastating globally on many levels.

Right now this virus has been around a 1-3% mortality rate. Obviously we are light years ahead medically vs the early 1900s.

Edit: One significant difference with the 1918 flu was that it equally effected younger adults. So far under 40 deaths have been pretty minimal.
This post was edited on 2/29/20 at 9:57 am
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5331 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 9:39 am to
quote:

The actual flu death rates are so low that the totals generated each year are augmented by modeling.


Have there been studies to try and determine the fatality rate across a spectrum of verified influenza cases? For example, test every individual in a sample population (maybe a small town or village) who develops flu-like symptoms during one flu season. Then follow those who test positive and count the deaths deemed related to the infection.
Posted by Poker_hog
Member since Mar 2019
3652 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 9:59 am to
quote:

LINK

Article that is worth the read, takes a pretty level approach and doesn't try to fan the fire.


So they’re predicting between 70,000 and 7,000,000 deaths worldwide. Sounds about right to me.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:02 am to
quote:

So far under 40 deaths have been pretty minimal.


Every death in Italy has been a minimum age of 63 and the 63 year old was an outlier when you look at the ages of the other deaths.
Posted by DollaChoppa
I Simp for ACC
Member since May 2008
84774 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:07 am to
Who needs socialism when we’ve got the coronavirus to redistribute wealth
Posted by CivilTiger83
Member since Dec 2017
2525 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Every death in Italy has been a minimum age of 63 and the 63 year old was an outlier when you look at the ages of the other deaths.


At least a couple of under 50 doctors in China have died.

Not sure why you are trying to argue. I noted that this has mostly effected the elderly when it comes to mortality.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:15 am to
I'm not arguing. Not sure how you took it that way. I was supporting your statement.
Posted by Old Sarge
Dean of Admissions, LSU
Member since Jan 2012
63234 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:18 am to
What about the 40-year-olds that are recovering from it now but are guaranteed to die from the flu when they’re in their early 60s because of the permanent lesions they are getting in their lungs now
Posted by CivilTiger83
Member since Dec 2017
2525 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:20 am to
quote:

I'm not arguing. Not sure how you took it that way. I was supporting your statement.


My apologies.
Posted by BallsEleven
Member since Mar 2019
6163 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:21 am to
quote:

There are other nuances, but that’s 1,000 foot view


Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
38283 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:26 am to
quote:

What about the 40-year-olds that are recovering from it now but are guaranteed to die from the flu when they’re in their early 60s because of the permanent lesions they are getting in their lungs now


You have a link to this doomsday scenario site? You're postulating something you can't prove as fact. IOW, fearmongering.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77272 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:31 am to
quote:

What about the 40-year-olds that are recovering from it now but are guaranteed to die from the flu when they’re in their early 60s because of the permanent lesions they are getting in their lungs now
How do you know they are permanent? You cannot make that prediction over a few weeks.

Are you aware that pneumonia lesions remain for weeks after a diagnosis and treatment?

It is why we don’t repeat imaging soon after a diagnosis unless there are worsening symptoms.

Where is this information coming from?

Get back to me when they rescan these individuals a year from now.
This post was edited on 2/29/20 at 10:34 am
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77272 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:33 am to
quote:

So they’re predicting between 70,000 and 7,000,000 deaths worldwide. Sounds about right to me.


That is an insane prediction that is almost guaranteed to not be wrong.

“Yea, there will be somewhere between 70,000 deaths and ten times that number worldwide.”

Whoever made that prediction is hedging his bets to the maximum.

Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:38 am to
Any attempt to predict deaths is pointless at this stage. Too many variables.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
21551 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:48 am to
quote:


That is an insane prediction that is almost guaranteed to not be wrong.

“Yea, there will be somewhere between 70,000 deaths and ten times that number worldwide.”

Whoever made that prediction is hedging his bets to the maximum.


Did you read the article? It was well written and balanced. They acknowledge that there is a ton that we don't know and they put a best guess, based on what we know now, for best case and worst case scenarios. Also, that wasn't even the main point of the article.

quote:

How to Save Lives in a COVID-19 Pandemic


LINK
Posted by yatesdog38
in your head rent free
Member since Sep 2013
12737 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 10:55 am to
Does it cause high fever? That's the only thing I'm worried about.
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
21551 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 11:02 am to
quote:

Any attempt to predict deaths is pointless at this stage. Too many variables.


I agree from a 24-hr news cycle point of view. However, it is necessary from a policy making, funding and preparedness perspective. A lot of energy is spent on trying to understand risk and how to best communicate that risk. As a scientist, I never expected to devote so much of my time to this kind of stuff. However, it is kind of cool to read an emergency funding bill and be like, "that right there, that was my point"
Posted by rds dc
Member since Jun 2008
21551 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 11:11 am to
quote:

President Trump will hold a press conference on coronavirus at 1:30 p.m. ET
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77272 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Any attempt to predict deaths is pointless at this stage. Too many variables.
Absolutely.

What that statement is though is akin to someone judging the stock market and saying “some time in the future, the market will fall”.

My prediction is that somewhere between 0 and 7 billion deaths will occur...and I’m already right.
Posted by Poker_hog
Member since Mar 2019
3652 posts
Posted on 2/29/20 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Any attempt to predict deaths is pointless at this stage. Too many variables.


Yeah but predicting a range is useful. It’s extremely wide but will narrow with better data. It already eliminates some of the predictions made by both doomers and downplayers.
Jump to page
Page First 305 306 307 308 309 ... 1190
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 307 of 1190Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram