
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cornell University Situation Is Going To Turn Into Another Duke Lacrosse Case Isn't It?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 5:30 pm to Stat M Repairman
Posted on 10/2/26 at 5:30 pm to Stat M Repairman
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Oh, ok, wow,
NY governor now claiming she wants to take away women's fundamental right to get drunk and frick.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 5:44 pm to East Coast Band
quote:
Definitely not my idea of an ideal threesome.
They likely crossed swords.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 5:51 pm to Stat M Repairman
I cant believe liberals are openly admitting that women are inferior to men.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 5:51 pm to QJenk
quote:
Sometimes you can go through something, only to later realize that what happened was not okay. Victims do not always recognize that they are victims immediately in the moment.
I’m not saying this doesn’t happen, but this reads like an info card for an episode of Law & Order: SVU
Posted on 10/2/26 at 6:19 pm to Stat M Repairman
quote:Both her and Big Mike need to find their way to North Sentinel Island.
Big Letty on it.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 6:22 pm to Stat M Repairman
I’m assuming this will also apply to drunk or high men
Posted on 10/2/26 at 6:52 pm to Stat M Repairman
That's not a loophole. Removing it would CREATE a loophole.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 7:49 pm to Bwmdx
Serious observation although it sounds like sarcasm: if white liberal men aren't safe at Ivy League Schools, where can they be safe?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:13 pm to Laugh More
quote:
I’m not saying this doesn’t happen, but this reads like an info card for an episode of Law & Order: SVU
we’re allowing ‘repressed memories’ to become admissible evidence again 40 years after the entire concept was bonked. unless there’s video evidence that shows exactly, and I mean exactly, what shes claiming then we’re allowing a special prosecutor with an axe to grind against the world apparently to take two statements by this woman as fact. two statements which are so diametrically opposed to one another it’s impossible to wrap your brain around that it should at the very least be given a huge amount of skepticism if not outright disqualifying.
and that’s not including the texts or anything else. it’s amazing to me how many people(posters here included) are still going with the, “what, are you condoning this?”
who the frick has condoned anything that happened that night? it’s all disgusting. but that mongoloid retard is going to try and put those boys away for life. this is getting so out of hand so fast that those boys lawyers better be drafting counter civil suits
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:40 pm to QJenk
quote:
Yes, you take those into consideration. But you don't look at the texts, and then not look at anything else. You should consider all of her statements.
This is either one hell of a troll, or I really don’t know what to say. Impressive if it is a troll, you’re committed
Posted on 10/3/26 at 12:41 am to Tall Tiger
quote:They haven’t been for a long time. I’ve seen a former classmate (all of K-12) bust his arse to get into one and then be destroyed by the administration. Everyone from our class that I’ve talked to agree that he wouldn’t hurt a fly, much less rape someone. Higher Ed in the 21st century is just an expensive wall hanging from a paper mill.
Serious observation although it sounds like sarcasm: if white liberal men aren't safe at Ivy League Schools, where can they be safe?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 1:20 am to East Coast Band
quote:
I can't imagine having a boner out around my bros who also have boners out. Super gay
The gayest part was the dudes making out with her after she had been sucking their bros dicks. Chi Phis must be really close.
Has no one posted this chick’s photos yet? Kind of a butterface but also cleans up ok in some photos.
LINK
LINK
Also this hot chick does a good review of some more texts that were released.
LINK
This post was edited on 10/3/26 at 1:34 am
Posted on 10/3/26 at 4:26 am to cwil177
Posted on 10/3/26 at 6:27 am to cwil177
quote:
cleans up ok
I haven't seen the pics to back this up, this chick is a skank.
The parents of these kids are paying 60K a year for them to get an education and they let some OT 1.5 ruin their lives.
Now they will be paying 100K (at least) for a lawyer
Posted on 10/3/26 at 7:55 am to WinnPtiger
quote:
take two statements by this woman as fact. two statements which are so diametrically opposed to one another it’s impossible to wrap your brain around
The 7, Cornell and everyone else will roast her in a deposition.
“Are you lying now or were you lying then? Which one is it?” She won’t be able to weasel out of this.
Not to mention the text messages where she claimed nothing was illegal and let’s get together again. She’s cooked in my book
Posted on 10/3/26 at 8:02 am to The Torch
quote:
I haven't seen the pics to back this up, this chick is a skank. The parents of these kids are paying 60K a year for them to get an education and they let some OT 1.5 ruin their lives.
Was she in a sorority and once this came to light, did they boot her?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 8:40 am to WinnPtiger
quote:
who the frick has condoned anything that happened that night? it’s all disgusting.
In this very thread, people have done exactly that.
Posted on 10/3/26 at 8:48 am to idlewatcher
quote:Tri delt, not sure if they booted her but that is one of the entities she is suing
Was she in a sorority and once this came to light, did they boot her?
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:18 am to tylercsbn9
From what I have read so far, that’s unfortunately the impression I’m getting
Posted on 10/3/26 at 9:20 am to Stat M Repairman
So then Kathy you'll apply the same standard to guys right, to protect men? So when a woman wants to have sex with a man who is drunk, that's rape against the man right?
I really wish the 2 men who were drunk would turn the tables and file rape charges against the girl. Since they were in no condition to "consent".
I really wish the 2 men who were drunk would turn the tables and file rape charges against the girl. Since they were in no condition to "consent".

Popular
Back to top


4












