Started By
Message

Coming Soon - Male birth control shot

Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:28 am
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
20703 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:28 am
quote:

They should make birth control for men...

Because it makes more sense to fire blanks than shoot at a bulletproof vest.


https://scitechdaily.com/male-birth-control-breakthrough-scientists-find-way-to-turn-sperm-production-off-and-back-on/

quote:

Cornell University scientists have made significant progress toward what many consider the holy grail of male birth control: a safe, long-acting, fully effective, and nonhormonal contraceptive that can be reversed.


quote:

Today, men have limited contraceptive choices, mainly condoms and vasectomies. While vasectomies offer a long-term solution, many men are hesitant to undergo the procedure, even though it can sometimes be reversed with additional surgery. At the same time, efforts to develop hormonal male contraceptives have faced concerns, partly because similar treatments have shown risks in women.

Cohen and her colleagues focused specifically on meiosis instead of other stages of sperm development to ensure that sperm production could be fully stopped while remaining reversible and without affecting overall reproductive function.


quote:

If this approach is successfully developed for humans, it could lead to a new form of male birth control delivered as an injection every three months or possibly as a patch to maintain effectiveness, Cohen said.

Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
34466 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:29 am to
This post was edited on 5/8/26 at 8:31 am
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21491 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:30 am to
quote:

They should make birth control for men... Because it makes more sense to fire blanks than shoot at a bulletproof vest.


I like this tagline!
Posted by Duckman13
Tiger Stadium
Member since Dec 2006
3063 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Because it makes more sense to fire blanks than shoot at a bulletproof vest.


So you would rather take shots over a period of time vs a 20 minute snip snip?
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59129 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:30 am to
Not needed baw

Around here we get ourselves a vasectomy and then wonder why we gotta get on trt a couple months later
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59129 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:31 am to
quote:

So you would rather take shots over a period of time vs a 20 minute snip snip?

“Just cut your balls off bro”
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150214 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:31 am to
But that would eliminate the need to pull out and go on her face.

Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
13076 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:33 am to
quote:

So you would rather take shots over a period of time vs a 20 minute snip snip?



Do you seriously not realize the temporary and long term difference of the two?
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
20703 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:33 am to
quote:

So you would rather take shots over a period of time vs a 20 minute snip snip?


The reversible part is the selling point.

How many women would rather be on birth control vs getting a partial hysterectomy?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89091 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:39 am to
quote:

The reversible part is the selling point.


Vasectomies are pretty easily reversible, also apparently there are other fairly easy and relatively cheap ways to have a kid without having it reversed regardless. My wife is trying to talk me into one of those
Posted by JasonDBlaha
Woodlands, Texas
Member since Apr 2023
4465 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:41 am to
Lupron is already a birth control method even though it’s indicated for prostate cancer
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77220 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:43 am to
quote:

production could be fully stopped while remaining reversible and without affecting overall reproductive function.
Scruffy will believe this when pigs fly.

No go for Scruffy.
Posted by BoogaBear
Member since Jul 2013
7330 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:44 am to
Vasectomy is pretty awesome. Wife isn't on any birth control and I haven't pulled out in 6 years.
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
11444 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:44 am to
Will be interesting to see where this goes come time for human trials. Since it's non-hormonal it has to be an RARa blocker that blocks vitamin A receptors to trigger meiosis. Three things to watch will be how many participants have a 'rebound' where the blocker become ineffective over time. What is the timeline for meiosis to restart after the blocker is stopped. How many participants see blocking beyond the targeted receptors. Concern with the latter is if additional receptors other than those targeted block vitamin A there will be vision loss (hopefully reversible once the RARa blocker is stopped). For the masses #2 will be the only factor, just to see if it's a 1 month or 6 month timeline between starting and stopping. Other two are going to be the outliers (hopefully).
Posted by theCrusher
Slidell
Member since Nov 2007
1729 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:46 am to
quote:

production could be fully stopped while remaining reversible and without affecting overall reproductive function.


Totally believable. What about hormonal balance in males including testosterone production?
Posted by Pfft
Member since Jul 2014
5050 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:48 am to
It's not nice to fool with mother nature.
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
20060 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:50 am to
Dudes about to be busting
Posted by LSUDonMCO
Orlando
Member since Dec 2003
8695 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 8:52 am to
I trust that it will lower men's testosterone levels until they are all Beta she-males.
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
11444 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 9:03 am to
quote:

What about hormonal balance in males including testosterone production?
That is why the target is RAR-alpha receptors. Beta and Gamma receptors are the ones that would effect testosterone production and subsequently prostate and libido health. The compound they are using based on the current studies is highly selective and as of now shows very little to no crossover, but most of the found crossover is to other alpha receptors like in the pupil which on healthy individuals is more than compensated for by the beta receptors that deal with eye health.
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
20703 posts
Posted on 5/8/26 at 9:04 am to
quote:

To achieve this, the team used JQ1, a small molecule inhibitor originally developed as a research tool for studying cancer and inflammatory diseases. Although JQ1 is not suitable as a treatment due to neurological side effects, it is known to interfere with a specific stage of meiosis called prophase 1. This allowed the researchers to demonstrate for the first time that sperm production can be safely and reversibly stopped by targeting meiosis and sperm production at this stage.




first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram