- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: COA in MORE hot water? Allegedly altered check sent to them by John Delgado
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:27 pm to FalseProphet
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:27 pm to FalseProphet
Well we know it won't be WAFB.
1
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:29 pm to shawnlsu
Someone needs to get this to the Nak.
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:31 pm to Mac
quote:
Altering who a check is addressed to requires more than incompetence.
In general terms yes, but in this case not so much. There's a mountain of evidence that's been well covered to suggest these people had no idea that the PAC and the COA weren't the same entity or why that's wrong. I'm not defending it in any way, i think they should purge the entire COA and charge everyone involved. Still, altering a relatively small check from someone who doesn't support you politically and probably checks their bank statements screams incompetence to me, not some highly organized money funnel.
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:33 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
I'm assuming when you hear hoofbeats you assume unicorns. Is that right? 
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:34 pm to FalseProphet
Trust me, he has it already lol
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:35 pm to tiger1969
do we have odds on who within the City government is going to go down with this? I have a feeling Hillar could find money being laundered all the way up to the city judges and maybe even the head of the city.
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:37 pm to therick711
I could easily say the same thing about people acting like this series of utterly retarded frickery where every single misstep is seems to be dumber than the last is actually the workings of some sophisticated political machine.
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:37 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
Who said "sophisticated"?
It can be a machine, just a shitty I'll-functioning one.
It can be a machine, just a shitty I'll-functioning one.
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:39 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
The evidence we have now is an altered check. Your assumption is incompetence. How the frick is that the most likely scenario? Unicorns. That's you.
Unicorns. That's you. 
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:41 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
do we have odds on who within the City government is going to go down with this?
C. Denise has to be the odds on favorite to win
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:41 pm to therick711
Yeah man, totally. I'm sure they thought the magic ink would disappear too before anyone caught wind of it. 
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:43 pm to terd ferguson
quote:
There will be ethics re-training in the future
However, first there must be a committee formed to discuss ways and means of implementing such training.
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:44 pm to shawnlsu
quote:
And not one peep from the "community leaders"
They're trying to figure out how to spin it as an honest mistake
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:45 pm to upgrayedd
Would "We're honestly retarded" count?
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:45 pm to TheDrunkenTigah
Witness: We saw a man that looked like the defendant exiting the vault with a bag of money with a dollar sign on it.
TheDrunkenTigah: Strikes me as incompetence. There is a mountain of evidence to suggest that the defendant didn't recognize what a dollar sign was and didn't know you couldn't take things from a vault.
That's why people are terrified of a jury of their peers.
I'm really just messing with you, though. I think that the indices of fraud are present. I'm pretty sure that most people are going to agree, assuming Delgado's assertion that it was altered is true. Who goes down for it? Probably some low-level flunky unless they sing.
TheDrunkenTigah: Strikes me as incompetence. There is a mountain of evidence to suggest that the defendant didn't recognize what a dollar sign was and didn't know you couldn't take things from a vault.
That's why people are terrified of a jury of their peers.
I'm really just messing with you, though. I think that the indices of fraud are present. I'm pretty sure that most people are going to agree, assuming Delgado's assertion that it was altered is true. Who goes down for it? Probably some low-level flunky unless they sing.
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:46 pm to FalseProphet
Every other candidate for office contributed to that PAC during the election season. I'm sure it delivered lots of votes. Did John do it on purpose? I wouldn't fault him if he did.
If John's check was altered, I'm sure others were also. That's worth checking out.
Either way, the COA has no business accepting public funds while being that close to a PAC. It screams impropriety.
If John's check was altered, I'm sure others were also. That's worth checking out.
Either way, the COA has no business accepting public funds while being that close to a PAC. It screams impropriety.
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:47 pm to teke184
quote:
Would "We're honestly retarded" count?
Everything they get busted on is an honest mistake. Eventually it boils down to either incompetence or corruption. Neither are good attributes of leadership.
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:51 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Everything they get busted on is an honest mistake. Eventually it boils down to either incompetence or corruption. Neither are good attributes
When they say they're ignorant, we all believe them. Maybe we're part of the problem.
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:51 pm to Btrtigerfan
quote:
When they say they're ignorant, we all believe them. Maybe we're part of the problem.
They're so fricking convincing, though.
Posted on 5/12/17 at 4:52 pm to therick711
I never said it wasn't fraud, Amar has already been caught by the audit using tax payer funds to campaign for the PAC. The fact that she still has a job amazes me. Still, I think that this just supports the even more alarming mindset throughout this organization that they and the PAC were one and the same, that all the money could go in one big pot because they're so grossly incompetent they don't recognize donations and tax derived funds from a plubic entity cannot be used as political donations.
Page 7 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News