- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chevron gets hit with $745M judgement on legacy case
Posted on 4/4/25 at 5:38 pm to LSUFanHouston
Posted on 4/4/25 at 5:38 pm to LSUFanHouston
Jeff Landry’s pro-business environment strikes again.
0
Posted on 4/4/25 at 5:39 pm to mylsuhat
They'll toss a bag of shucked oyster shells into the gulf and call it good
Posted on 4/4/25 at 5:40 pm to Duffnshank
quote:
Btw, these started with JBE slimy arse.
Wrong. These suits have been here a lot longer than that.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 5:45 pm to TBoy
Nope, not these particular bullshite legacy lawsuits. You’re wrong buddy. Of course there have and will always be lawsuits, some even legit, but nothing like what you see with these.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 5:45 pm to LSUFanHouston
Didn’t these contracts over the last 100 years require the oil companies to fill back all the access canals that we let them dig all over our coastal wetlands? The answer is yes, it was in the contracts.
Filling the canals was expensive. So they didn’t do it. They paid off state politicians to look the other way. But yet we’re on the side of the oil companies?
Now we have saltwater intrusion through these canals that has long since destroyed our freshwater ecosystem, leading to exponential loss of coastal land.
I can only guess that those mad at the state are the same people playing golf instead of out there fishing - witnessing land disappear year to year.
But yeah y’all go ahead and be mad at the state.
Filling the canals was expensive. So they didn’t do it. They paid off state politicians to look the other way. But yet we’re on the side of the oil companies?
Now we have saltwater intrusion through these canals that has long since destroyed our freshwater ecosystem, leading to exponential loss of coastal land.
I can only guess that those mad at the state are the same people playing golf instead of out there fishing - witnessing land disappear year to year.
But yeah y’all go ahead and be mad at the state.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 5:49 pm to slidingstop
You're right. Wrong picture.
Years ago in the NYTimes, they reported that a newly minted PhD had said sea levels were rising based on satellite images in the Chesapeake Bay due to global warming. He said that was true because there was more reflectivity meaning open water than the previous decades.
In another section of the NYTimes, there was an article about the massive damages nutria were doing to swamp grasses denuding massive areas of the Chesapeake Bay.
I hear they make a nice fur coat!
Years ago in the NYTimes, they reported that a newly minted PhD had said sea levels were rising based on satellite images in the Chesapeake Bay due to global warming. He said that was true because there was more reflectivity meaning open water than the previous decades.
In another section of the NYTimes, there was an article about the massive damages nutria were doing to swamp grasses denuding massive areas of the Chesapeake Bay.
I hear they make a nice fur coat!
Posted on 4/4/25 at 5:50 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
this verdict is worse than losing the vote for Amendment 2 oil baw workers better update their resumes
Most o&g workers from Louisiana are already working in or have moved to Texas
Posted on 4/4/25 at 5:51 pm to Duffnshank
quote:Exactly; DNR changed the fkn rules.
This is dumb, I’m guessing you’re an attorney. LA Statewide 29-B came into effect in 1982. That’s more than 40 yrs ago. Also the most stringent and ridiculous regulations in the lower 48 states at the time. Don’t spout stupid shite.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 5:55 pm to White Bear
It was DEQ moron. So you’re saying shite that stopped 40 years ago still deserves reparations? What about 100 yrs ago, or 200, see where this is going and always does in this shitty state?
Btw, Texas still has extremely more lenient rules than La to this day. Why don’t we see this in Texas?
Btw, Texas still has extremely more lenient rules than La to this day. Why don’t we see this in Texas?
This post was edited on 4/4/25 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 4/4/25 at 6:02 pm to Duffnshank
quote:eat shite I was agreeing with you.
It was DEQ moron
Posted on 4/4/25 at 6:07 pm to White Bear
My apologies, thought I was editing a reply to Tboy. Just sounded like some shite he would throw to see if it’ll stick.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 6:07 pm to Duffnshank
quote:
Nope, not these particular bullshite legacy lawsuits. You’re wrong buddy. Of course there have and will always be lawsuits, some even legit, but nothing like what you see with these.
The suit for that judgment today was filed in 2013. Jindal was Governor then.
Respectfully, you are mistaken.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 6:41 pm to TBoy
quote:
Jindal was Governor then.
He sucked. And I'm a Republican.
Worst.
Governor.
Ever.
I would vote for a deceased Edwin Edwards before him.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 6:42 pm to mylsuhat
Little light on the attorney fees
Posted on 4/4/25 at 6:46 pm to N2cars
It is cute people still think of Jindal as a governor.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 6:55 pm to Duffnshank
You're right.
His face shoulda been on the side of a milk cartoon.
And his mom was hilarious, thinking she had influence after he embarrassed himself.
He can pretend to rehabilitate himself writing OP-ED pieces for the WSJ.
Or, he csn deliver mail in Amite.
He'd probably eff that up, too.
His face shoulda been on the side of a milk cartoon.
And his mom was hilarious, thinking she had influence after he embarrassed himself.
He can pretend to rehabilitate himself writing OP-ED pieces for the WSJ.
Or, he csn deliver mail in Amite.
He'd probably eff that up, too.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 7:01 pm to N2cars
In his defense, he didn’t r anything up any worse than any other governor we’ve had in our lifetimes. Yet people, both D and R, don’t want to admit that neither has done shite for this state. It’s not hard to pick out the trust fund blowhards on this forum.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 7:12 pm to Duffnshank
I respectfully disagree.
He was terrible, and I saw it up close.
He was given a gift, and he squndered it.
He could've made an impact and he made the wrong choice at every turn.
He was terrible, and I saw it up close.
He was given a gift, and he squndered it.
He could've made an impact and he made the wrong choice at every turn.
Posted on 4/4/25 at 7:21 pm to N2cars
quote:
He was terrible,
Yeah he was pretty bad. He doesn’t make it to the top 3 worst of the past 30 years, though.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News