re: Chemtrail Deniers: Can you explain this photo? BTW, you can't.

A while back, I was asked to be a judge in a middle/high school science fair. This one girl did her project on now Tylenol can damage the liver... Which an overdose Tylenol can certainly do.

So, her project consisted of two beef livers that she brought from the store, she crushed Tylenol and sprinkled the crushed Tylenol on one liver and left the other liver alone. After about 3 days, she noticed that the Tylenol sprinkled liver did turned darker in color. Thus, her conclusion was that Tylenol did indeed cause liver toxicity...

I went into great detail to tell her that the mechanism of Tylenol toxicity is during the metabolism of the ingested Tylenol by the liver, and that too much Tylenol overwhelms the liver and caused liver damage...

She looked at me and pointed to her cow liver and said 'See? That liver is with Tylenol sprinkles is damaged!!'

.... I just walked away... Never judged another science fair...

In a way that's how arguing with these 'Chemtrails', fluoride in water supply, anti-vaccination... Conspiracy theorists usually turned out. Logic has no validity in their distorted view.

quote:

---

Is it possible Yoga Girl is a troll?

---

She executes Trevor's Axiom almost perfectly.

quote:

---

More poking fun at others, but yeah AJAX is coming off as pretty pathetic in here so keep on laughing, he deserves it.

---

Sweet...hooked my 2nd verified hater...well worth the PR damage Super Saint

Guess you missed the sleep paralysis thread when I first talked to the person YG.

Girl or guy, has more interesting shite to say than the hating arse rubbernecks that flock to every thread.

quote:

---

How effective does chemtrails have to be in order for us to have side effects? That is if it exists, I'm sure some do but not to the extent to where it's harmful.

Why not use these chemicals in the soil so that we ingest it or or put it in medications (orally, im, or iv) it would absorb faster and effects would occur more rapidly.

---

Bro, I try to keep an open mind about everything, because the entire world is full of purposeful disinformation. I haven't concluded that CHEM trails are for sure real, but where there is smoke , there is fire.

Fools ignore evidence at there own peril. Watch videos of military LSD tests...read up on MK Ultra....Ted Kazinsky.... there's many theories, and there's no unifying answer.

My suspicion is there has been a real effort to control the weather, & trial and error would have definite side effects. If you could manipulate a countries' weather, you could control their dependence on foreign food , water sources, etc and neutralize populations without putting a boot on the ground. Similarly, there would be efforts to improve our weather systems (Cali drought). Some may have backfired, exacerbating the problem.

The rabbit hole goes much deeper. NO one KNOWS. But some pray for wisdom, discernment ,knowledge, & are occasionally blessed with an idea or two to pursue certain truths. And the same people you are trying to help will mock you and denigrate you for even attempting to make an effort.

Add: if some of the ppl here knew who they were REALLY talking shite to IRL ...who have sacrificed so much for the cause, they would be fricking ashamed of themselves

If you think about the concept of 'Chemtrails' with just a minute bit of logic, the concept easily unravels.

1. Chemicals/drugs released so high in the atmosphere get so dispersed, that at the very most the exposure becomes so diluted in the order of 1 part per trillions. Definitely not enough to cause any biological or physiological effects

2. If these minute chemicals do have an effect on biological systems, they cannot not specifically only affect humans. We have not developed a drug that effectively gene targets only certain species, humans. Thus, since humans are considered a fairly large organism, smaller organisms like cats, dogs, birds, fish, etc. will show effects first... if the dispersal of the chemicals are uniform.

3. If our secret government do really want to expose the populace to chemicals, they would be much more efficient putting the chemicals in our water supply or just coat new coins with the chemicals.

Those are just a few logical fallacies that I could think of against the validity of chemtrails conspiracy.

While those are all valid points, think of the counter argument.

One drop of LSD could have over 200 u/g, which would put a human into a full blown trip.

Remember "don't eat the brown acid"? Not saying it's happening, but as advanced as we are, it's not out of the realm of possibility for top scientists to isolate the part of the chemistry that involves aggression, paranoaia, etc, and weaponize it in small doses.

Could be something that is futuristic, but regardless, our past has shown that certain parts of those in power have no regard for human life & wouldn't think twice about experimenting.

Are the pilot aware of it? The apparatus has to get on the airliner somehow.
Someone has to load the fluid tanks.