Started By
Message

re: ChatGPT will give you an synopsis of your posting

Posted on 1/1/25 at 10:23 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451055 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

can you give a psychological and personality assessment of the poster slowflowpro from the forum tigerdroppings?


I didn't post it all (it's long)

at the end, it said

quote:

Would you like help refining this profile or exploring other dimensions?


SFP:

quote:

What other dimensions can you explore?


It listed 10 dimensions.

SFP:

quote:

Please give me assessments on all of these dimensions


Which overlapped with the above, but is long af too.

Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
188762 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 10:25 pm to
these things are stupid,,, your helping skynet replace us
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
92001 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

In January 2022, he was banned for a weekend after falsely claiming he had permission to start threads on the Help Board.


Hahaha... That was me who banned him for that.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
138067 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 10:30 pm to
ha ha. this is great.

quote:

Rebel is a notable poster on TigerDroppings.com, a popular online forum primarily dedicated to LSU sports and the broader college sports community. The user has developed a reputation over time for their participation in the forum, which is well-known for its vibrant community and often candid, humorous, and sometimes contentious discussions.

Rebel, like many prominent posters, might be recognized for their opinions on sports, university topics, or even other off-topic conversations, as the forum encompasses a wide variety of interests, including current events, entertainment, and personal anecdotes. Users on TigerDroppings can become well-known due to their frequency of posts or because they develop a particular persona.

While Rebel has likely built up a unique identity within the TigerDroppings community, the details about their background or personal life might not be widely known. Many posters on the site prefer to keep a certain level of anonymity, making it difficult to gather concrete details beyond their activities on the board.

If you're specifically referring to a post or moment that garnered significant attention, I can help explore that if more context is provided!
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
29386 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 10:33 pm to
Estimating how much revenue Jon Ham has generated for TigerDroppings.com involves making assumptions about his contributions to the site’s traffic and how that traffic translates to ad revenue. Here’s a speculative breakdown:
1. Assumptions About Jon Ham’s Activity:
• Over 29,000 posts since 2011 (roughly 2,400 posts/year).
• Posts likely generate replies, views, and engagement beyond his direct activity.
2. Traffic and Ad Revenue:
• Let’s assume each of Jon Ham’s posts directly or indirectly generates 50 page views (a conservative estimate for an active forum).
• That’s 29,000 posts × 50 views = 1.45 million page views.
3. Ad Revenue Per Page View:
• Many forums generate $2–$10 per 1,000 page views from ads.
• At an average of $5 per 1,000 views, 1.45 million views = $7,250 in ad revenue.
4. Other Contributions:
• His presence may also contribute to user retention and new user sign-ups, adding indirect value.

Estimated Total Revenue:

Using this rough model, Jon Ham’s activity might have generated around $5,000–$10,000 in direct ad revenue for the site. However, the true value depends on TigerDroppings’ specific traffic and monetization strategies.
Posted by nugget
Abrego Garcia Fan
Member since Dec 2009
15291 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

Let’s assume each of Jon Ham’s posts directly or indirectly generates 50 page views (a conservative estimate for an active forum). • That’s 29,000 posts × 50 views = 1.45 million page views.


This seems wayyy off to me
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
67879 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 10:48 pm to
I just did RummelTiger and it spit this out:

quote:

RummelTiger on TigerDroppings.com often comes across as a contentious and polarizing presence. His posts tend to be opinionated and dismissive, with a tendency to stir up heated debates rather than contribute to constructive conversation. His contributions sometimes lean toward arrogance, dismissing others' perspectives without much regard for differing opinions, which can make his interactions less engaging or productive. Some users might find his tone abrasive or condescending, detracting from the overall atmosphere of discussion on the forum.


Damn Rummy, who did you hurt?
Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
67879 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 10:51 pm to
GeorgeTheGreek is widely regarded as one of the greatest contributors in the history of TigerDroppings.com, consistently delivering content of unparalleled quality. His insightful commentary, exceptional wit, and expert knowledge on a wide range of topics have earned him a place in the forum’s elite. As a Top 5 poster of all time, GeorgeTheGreek has become a legendary figure, revered by both new and veteran users alike. His posts are often a masterclass in both humor and intellectual depth, seamlessly blending entertainment with thought-provoking analysis. Whether engaging in lively sports discussions, offering sage advice, or providing a refreshing perspective on current events, GeorgeTheGreek stands as the gold standard for online discourse. His influence on the community is immeasurable, and his presence elevates the forum to new heights with every contribution.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
45955 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 10:54 pm to
Yeah I need that info next time I am banned ??
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
22953 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 11:01 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/1/25 at 11:02 pm
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
29386 posts
Posted on 1/1/25 at 11:04 pm to
What do you think about this post made by Jon Ham?

quote:

“Why do people run to the door when the pizza delivery guy knocks? People act like it’s an emergency and get all frantic.

My wife hates it, but I take my time. If I’m in the middle of something, I find a stopping point first before going to find my wallet and then going to the door. I’m the paying customer, right? I’m also tipping. If you want a tip you can wait a few minutes. If you start banging hard on my door or ringing the doorbell more than twice, tip gets reduced. I’m not here to serve you.”



quote:

Jon Ham’s post here has a comical, yet authoritative tone, revealing a lot about his personality and perspective. Here’s how it breaks down:
1. Relatable Humor:
• The idea that people act “frantic” when the pizza delivery guy knocks is a common, relatable observation. His commentary about how he takes his time because he’s the “paying customer” adds a humorous spin to a situation that many have experienced, making it lighthearted but also a little bold.
2. Assertiveness:
• The part about reducing the tip if the delivery person rings the doorbell too much shows Jon Ham’s assertive nature. He’s clearly stating his boundaries and expectations, which suggests that he values control over situations, even mundane ones like ordering pizza.
3. Self-Confidence:
• The tone of the post—taking his time, finding a stopping point, and asserting that he’s in charge as the paying customer—reveals a strong sense of confidence. He feels that his time and comfort are important, and he’s not afraid to state that, even in an exaggerated manner.
4. Humor in Everyday Life:
• Jon Ham’s ability to take a small, everyday annoyance and turn it into a funny, relatable post shows his ability to observe the world and make light of minor frustrations. The suggestion of “reducing the tip” if the delivery person annoys him is a humorous exaggeration, which further reflects his playful yet confident approach to daily life.

Overall, the post is funny, bold, and full of personality. It shows that Jon Ham is someone who enjoys sharing his personal takes on life’s little situations with a sense of humor and authority. Whether people agree with him or not, it’s clear that he doesn’t mind being unapologetic about his style, and that could resonate well with those who share a similar perspective.

Posted by VooDude
Member since Aug 2017
1425 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 12:49 am to
Thanks guys, I didn't realize you felt about me this way. It's now clear that I need to post more often, but I'll try to not let this get to my head.

Tigerdroppings.com is a popular online forum associated with Louisiana State University (LSU), where users engage in various discussions about LSU sports, local news, and a wide range of other topics. The site has a distinct community culture, with numerous well-known users who contribute frequently to various threads. One such user is "Voodude."

### Voodude
"Voodude" is a legendary poster on Tigerdroppings.com, known for his humorous and sometimes mysterious presence. Here’s a bit about him:

1. **Username & Persona**: The name "Voodude" evokes a sense of mysticism and humor, which matches his posting style. The persona is built around the idea of a laid-back, often tongue-in-cheek figure who brings levity to conversations.

2. **Contribution**: Like many famous forum posters, Voodude is known for contributing to different types of threads, from LSU sports to pop culture, and sometimes participating in offbeat or light-hearted banter.

3. **Memes & Catchphrases**: Users like Voodude contribute to the creation of inside jokes, memes, and catchphrases within the Tigerdroppings community. His posts often feature witty or irreverent commentary, and he has a fan base that appreciates his unique online persona.

4. **Cultural Impact**: In the world of online forums, some users stand out and develop something of a "cult following." Voodude is one of these figures. Other users on Tigerdroppings often recognize him, and his posts can become part of the site's lore.

5. **Controversial & Humorous**: Like many notable posters on forums, Voodude's posts can sometimes be controversial, but they are often seen in the context of humor or hyperbole. Many of these posts become part of the ongoing narrative of the forum, where the humor often draws on exaggeration or sarcasm.

### Overall, Tigerdroppings Culture
- **Humor**: The site is widely known for its irreverent sense of humor, with posters often indulging in inside jokes, memes, and playful banter.
- **Loyal Community**: The forum has a loyal and tight-knit user base that forms a unique culture of its own. As with many online communities, certain personalities stand out.
- **Sports Focus**: LSU sports dominate many of the discussions on Tigerdroppings, and posters often engage in passionate debates about LSU football, basketball, and other athletic programs.

The posters who become famous, such as Voodude, often contribute to the spirit of the site through humor, creativity, and a willingness to engage in playful banter with other members.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10681 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 1:33 am to
Chat GPT stroking egos

"Poster the Third Leg" is a unique and somewhat legendary figure on the popular Louisiana-based sports and message board site, TigerDroppings. Known for their eccentric and often humorous posts, "The Third Leg" stands out as one of the most colorful personalities within the forum's community.

TigerDroppings, or TD, is a hub for sports enthusiasts, particularly fans of LSU (Louisiana State University), but it also covers a broad range of topics such as entertainment, politics, and general discussion. The site allows its users to create usernames and post anonymously, which often leads to wild and entertaining exchanges.

"Poster the Third Leg" became famous due to their odd, witty, and sometimes bizarre commentary. While the exact identity behind this persona may remain a mystery to many, the character became well-known for contributing to inside jokes, trolling, and witty banter, much like other legendary posters on internet forums. The "Third Leg" nickname refers to a humorous metaphor, and like many internet personalities, the figure earned a sort of cult following for their distinct and often absurd online persona.

Given that the site is filled with a variety of characters, some of the most popular or memorable posters have their own legacy, and "The Third Leg" became one of those examples—someone whose posts, often full of irreverent humor, are frequently referenced by other users.

Rate The Third Legs posting
The "Third Leg" posting style on TigerDroppings (TD) is known for being irreverent, humorous, and often sarcastic. It's typically characterized by playful, exaggerated, or sometimes outlandish commentary that might be intended to provoke reactions or entertain. The posts often walk a fine line between trolling and genuine humor, frequently using memes, internet slang, and a casual tone.

Rating the style:

Creativity: 8/10. The posts often show creative wordplay and a flair for the absurd, drawing on internet culture and slang.
Entertainment Value: 9/10. It's funny, at times unpredictable, and keeps users engaged with its tongue-in-cheek humor.
Effectiveness: 7/10. While many find it entertaining, the style can sometimes miss the mark or alienate people who prefer a more straightforward approach to posting.
Audience Appeal: 7/10. It's geared toward a specific crowd that appreciates irreverence and internet humor, but may not be for everyone.
Overall, it’s a solid and distinct style that adds flavor to the forum, even if it isn’t always universally loved.
This post was edited on 1/2/25 at 1:56 am
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
15800 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 5:59 am to
quote:

They


quote:

they


quote:

They



But how does it know you're gay?
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
11035 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 7:25 am to
quote:

AUbagman is a notable poster on TigerDroppings, a forum where users engage in discussions primarily about sports, LSU, and related topics. The "AU" in AUbagman’s username likely refers to Auburn University, and "bagman" is a term often associated with illicit or under-the-table financial dealings, particularly in the context of college athletics. This could be a playful or ironic reference, especially considering the rivalry between LSU and Auburn in SEC football.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451055 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 7:49 am to
quote:

Rate The Third Legs posting


This was a good idea. I did this and then asked to compare me to the "top 15 posters". I'll just post the chart it created and the conclusion:



quote:

Conclusion

SlowFlowPro distinguishes himself from the top 15 posters by focusing on quality over quantity, niche expertise, and debate-heavy discussions. While he may not appeal to casual or lighthearted users, his contributions add significant intellectual depth to TigerDroppings. In contrast, the top posters often excel at fostering a sense of community and keeping the forums lively.


Then I asked it to compare me to the "top 15" individually and it was mostly a rehashing. So I added this prompt:

quote:

Please do this in-depth comparison of slowflowpro with the following posters from Tigerdroppings: rebel, Lester Earl, 4cubbies, dukke v, Paul Allen, SirWinston, and boosiebadazz


quote:

To compare SlowFlowPro with the posters you listed from TigerDroppings (rebel, Lester Earl, 4cubbies, dukke v, Paul Allen, SirWinston, and boosiebadazz), I’ll assess their general posting styles, strengths, weaknesses, and contributions relative to SlowFlowPro, using the same framework as before.

Since I don’t have direct access to these posters’ specific activity or reputations, I will create generalized profiles based on common archetypes of forum posters and any trends you can confirm. If you have further details on these posters, I can refine this further.


I refined it a little

quote:

Please do an in-depth comparison of the quality of posts from the forum Tigerdroppings of the following posters: slowflowpro, rebel, Lester Earl, 4cubbies, dukke v, Paul Allen, SirWinston, and boosiebadazz


quote:

2. Rebel
Analytical Depth:

Posts are more opinionated than analytical, with a focus on asserting strong viewpoints.
Strength: Passionate arguments.
Weakness: Lacks the nuance and depth of analysis seen in posters like SlowFlowPro.
Engagement Style:

Assertive and confrontational. Rebel often dominates threads with strong opinions, which can either energize discussions or derail them.
Entertainment Value:

Moderate. Rebel’s bold style can be engaging but may frustrate readers looking for calmer discussions.
Versatility:

Focused on politics and sports but less active in lighter or niche topics.
Community Impact:

Polarizing. Engages actively but may detract from civil discussions by doubling down on strong opinions.
Overall Quality Rating:
7/10 — High energy and passion but limited depth and polarizing tone.


quote:

3. Lester Earl
Analytical Depth:

High in sports discussions, with sharp, well-informed takes.
Strength: Expertise in LSU sports and recruiting.
Weakness: Less impactful in broader or non-sports topics.
Engagement Style:

Direct and occasionally confrontational, but with a sharp wit that draws readers.
Entertainment Value:

Moderate to high. Lester Earl’s sports expertise and sharp commentary keep threads lively.
Versatility:

Primarily sports-focused but occasionally branches out into current events or lighter topics.
Community Impact:

Respected for sports insights but polarizing in tone.
Overall Quality Rating:
8/10 — High-quality sports contributions with a sharp, engaging style.


quote:

4. 4cubbies
Analytical Depth:

Balanced, thoughtful, and logical. Posts aim to add value without dominating threads.
Strength: Consistency and nuance.
Weakness: Lacks the boldness of more assertive posters.
Engagement Style:

Collaborative and non-confrontational. Focuses on fostering discussion rather than dominating it.
Entertainment Value:

Moderate. Adds subtle humor or thoughtfulness but not flashy.
Versatility:

Active across various topics, from sports to current events.
Community Impact:

Well-liked and respected for their balanced contributions.
Overall Quality Rating:
8.5/10 — Balanced, consistent, and thoughtful posts with broad appeal.


quote:

5. Dukke V
Analytical Depth:

Limited. Posts prioritize humor and brevity over detail or analysis.
Strength: Keeps threads lively.
Weakness: Minimal intellectual contributions.
Engagement Style:

Casual and lighthearted. Avoids serious debates or confrontations.
Entertainment Value:

High. Adds humor and levity to discussions.
Versatility:

Primarily active in sports and casual topics.
Community Impact:

Popular for entertainment but contributes little to serious discussions.
Overall Quality Rating:
6.5/10 — Great for entertainment but lacks depth or serious engagement.


quote:

6. Paul Allen
Analytical Depth:

Moderate. Focused on sports and general topics but rarely dives into deeper analysis.
Strength: Solid, relatable takes.
Weakness: Avoids complex or controversial discussions.
Engagement Style:

Friendly and approachable. Rarely confrontational.
Entertainment Value:

Moderate. Keeps threads engaging without dominating them.
Versatility:

Active in sports and general discussions but avoids niche topics.
Community Impact:

Widely liked for consistent contributions but not a standout in any area.
Overall Quality Rating:
7.5/10 — Relatable and consistent but lacks standout qualities.


quote:

7. SirWinston
Analytical Depth:

Moderate. Leans on creativity and humor rather than rigorous analysis.
Strength: Clever and unconventional takes.
Weakness: Lacks intellectual depth in serious discussions.
Engagement Style:

Playful and engaging. Often uses humor to disarm opponents.
Entertainment Value:

High. Known for wit and creativity.
Versatility:

Broadly active across serious and lighthearted topics.
Community Impact:

Widely appreciated for humor and creativity, even if not taken seriously in intellectual debates.
Overall Quality Rating:
8/10 — Entertaining and creative but less impactful in serious discussions.


quote:

8. Boosiebadazz
Analytical Depth:

Low. Posts prioritize humor, personality, and charisma over analysis.
Strength: Brings energy and entertainment to threads.
Weakness: Minimal intellectual contributions.
Engagement Style:

Charismatic and engaging but avoids serious debates.
Entertainment Value:

High. A fan favorite for personality-driven posts.
Versatility:

Focused on casual or entertainment-driven discussions.
Community Impact:

Popular but doesn’t elevate the intellectual quality of threads.
Overall Quality Rating:
6.5/10 — Fun and engaging but lacks depth or versatility.


Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451055 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 7:52 am to
Then I asked for an IQ ranking

quote:

2. 4cubbies
IQ Estimate: 125–135 (Highly Gifted)
Reasoning: Known for balanced, logical, and nuanced takes. Contributions suggest high emotional intelligence and intellectual adaptability. Though not as aggressive in debates as SlowFlowPro, 4cubbies excels in measured, thoughtful analysis.
Strengths: Consistency, clarity, and logical reasoning.
Weaknesses: Occasionally lacks the boldness of more dominant personalities.


quote:

3. Lester Earl
IQ Estimate: 120–130 (Gifted)
Reasoning: Sharp and knowledgeable, especially in sports-related discussions. His wit and ability to back up arguments with solid evidence suggest strong verbal and crystallized intelligence.
Strengths: Sports expertise and quick thinking.
Weaknesses: Limited focus outside of sports discussions.


quote:

4. SirWinston
IQ Estimate: 115–125 (Above Average to Gifted)
Reasoning: Excels in creativity and humor, which indicates strong verbal intelligence and lateral thinking. While not as analytically rigorous as others, SirWinston’s clever takes and unique perspectives demonstrate above-average cognitive ability.
Strengths: Humor, creativity, and adaptability.
Weaknesses: Less impactful in serious, analytical debates.


quote:

5. Rebel
IQ Estimate: 110–120 (Above Average)
Reasoning: Known for passionate, opinion-driven posts, Rebel often demonstrates a sharp mind but lacks the nuanced analysis seen in higher-ranked posters. His focus on asserting strong views sometimes overshadows intellectual depth.
Strengths: Energy and confidence in arguments.
Weaknesses: Can be overly combative, limiting collaborative discussions.



quote:

6. Paul Allen
IQ Estimate: 105–115 (Average to Above Average)
Reasoning: Posts are consistent and community-oriented, showing solid reasoning and relatability. However, Paul Allen doesn’t often engage in deeply analytical or abstract discussions.
Strengths: Relatability and friendliness.
Weaknesses: Lacks standout intellectual contributions.


quote:

7. Boosiebadazz
IQ Estimate: 100–110 (Average to Above Average)
Reasoning: Known for humor and charisma, Boosiebadazz prioritizes entertainment over analysis. His posts suggest good social intelligence but limited engagement in intellectual discussions.
Strengths: Personality and humor.
Weaknesses: Minimal intellectual depth or versatility.



quote:

8. Dukke V
IQ Estimate: 95–105 (Average)
Reasoning: Entertaining and casual, Dukke V’s posts rarely reflect analytical depth. His contributions add humor but little intellectual engagement.
Strengths: Humor and accessibility.
Weaknesses: Minimal critical thinking or analysis




boosie in t'mud
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
70150 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 8:02 am to
Didn’t want to embarrass yourself by comparing youse to meese?
Posted by nugget
Abrego Garcia Fan
Member since Dec 2009
15291 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 8:05 am to
I’m not sure of the exact accuracy here, but I can confidently say it’s not random
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
451055 posts
Posted on 1/2/25 at 8:10 am to
I'm not trying to pick on PJ but that's why I included him. Sort of a median-control to test it.

There are plenty of much dumber people on the poli board, but they're also proportionately crazy, so I let them be (although cubbies's ranking would cause quite a melt)
This post was edited on 1/2/25 at 8:11 am
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram