re: CDC knew COVID vax associated with myocarditis but left off post-vax surveys

“consult with a trusted doctor or medical professional”

I was very disappointed with several Drs.that I knew that I respected as being a knowledgeable and ethical.Bought into the whole vaccination,boosters crap and also disparaged ivermectin as “horse wormer” and would not give it to patients.

I relied on my own research,refused the shot and when I got Covid I took ivermectin from feed store.

quote:

---

I was very disappointed with several Drs.that I knew that I respected as being a knowledgeable and ethical.Bought into the whole vaccination,boosters crap and also disparaged ivermectin as “horse wormer” and would not give it to patients.

---

I get the disappointment. My dr asked me to get it, answered all of my questions, so I did. I would let him cut me open to repair my heart, why not this? I have many more questions for him now.

My kid's pediatrician recommended it for my kids. I asked him a bunch of questions, he could not answer most of them, and admitted to not having the answers. My kids did not receive the shot.

quote:

---

I relied on my own research,refused the shot and when I got Covid I took ivermectin from feed store.

---

I don't think you should have done the last thing, but I'm glad it worked out for you.

quote:

---

You should have asked your Dr how much he got paid per shot for some goofy study. FACT. or if the Dr was under a larger hospital what the quota was

---

All of these things cross my mind from time to time. In fairness, he didn't administer the shot, so I'm not sure what he gained from it.

We pure bloods knew this, and played the mask game but refused to be guinea pigs for big pharma.


Congrats. On ur COVID cure(lol)

#PurebloodsnotMuggles

quote:

---

Among the 10 million-plus users of the agency's v-safe active monitoring smartphone app through July — 8.5 million of whom signed up between December 2020 and April 2021, before all adults were eligible for COVID vaccines — nearly 8% said they required medical care after receiving the vaccines.

---

When compounded with the fact that people with interactions are infinitely more likely to report than those with none, the data has limited relevance.

quote:

---

ut you can't discredit the entire article because of what you think the site is, that this came from, or that you saw one buzzword that you didn't like.

---

That buzzword is a 100% clear indication of bias on the author's part. As such, the article discredits itself by choosing to use it.

quote:

---

It doesn’t matter. The last surviving Marxist jab victim will gasp”thank God for the vaccine” as the clots stop his blood flow. There is no data they will believe. There is no medical whistleblower they won’t discredit. Their minds are poisoned just like their bodies. It is beyond pointless to engage them on this and many other topics.

---

You sound as dumb and brainwashed as the people you are describing

quote:

---

You sound as dumb and brainwashed as the people you are describing

---

So you definitely want to know if this vaccine is killing people and you
have no preconceived notions that would lead you to immediately
dismiss any report that states so.

That’s great. so Im sure you recognize that the Govt. and Pharma is
lying about everything concerning this “vaccine”?

Maybe I misjudged you.

quote:

---

I'll be honest. It's hard to take any "news" article seriously that calls the COVID vaccine, "the jab". It's like angsty teenagers are writing this stuff.

---

I think it is harder to take the govt seriously after years of telling the public that they better get the jab and how safe and effective it is. Good thing I never got jabbed.

quote:

---

Feel free to read the signed court order, and the relevant files released to ICAN. You may not like the source but you can't dispute the facts:

1) ICAN sued the CDC via the Freedom of Information Act, to release V-SAFE data for review.
2) CDC released some data to ICAN.
3) ICAN released the CDC data to the public.

---

Post vaccines surveys are not exactly a well designed study. It's kind of like going to an ER and surveying who is there for what and trying to extrapolate that data to fit what ailments a population has without skew.

How is any of this data representative of the larger population?