- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bruce Lee vs NFL lineman
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:44 pm to Jim Rockford
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:44 pm to Jim Rockford
bruce lee . if this is to the death he could use pressure points
0
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:46 pm to boom roasted
quote:
Your belief that Bruce Lee is this extraordinary fighter is comical.
oh you're one of THESE dumbasses
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:47 pm to AU_251
Yep. One of those dumbasses that lives in reality.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:47 pm to Huey Lewis
quote:
how much could he bench
I've heard he could rep 250 or more.
Not sure on legs. I know he did tons of one leg pistol type squats etc.
He focused lots on isometrics.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:48 pm to jbgleason
quote:
Before all the Bruce Lee bull shite starts, it is a fact that size beats technique pretty much every time. If a guy is big enough, like the guy you describe, and he gets hold of you... Game Over.
I matched against a guy not much smaller than that at a CQB course and it was all good until he managed to ground me and get on top. There wasn't shite I could do. Frankly, it was fricking terrifying being crushed by someone that big.
nonsense, a trained and skilled big fighter will beat a trained and skilled small fighter almost always, but a small trained fighter would destroy an untrained big guy every time.
Bruce Lee was fast, super fast, and that defeats size in so many ways. Especially when you have the fighting skills of Bruce Lee
I doubt any current NFL lineman could last 3 rounds with Bruce Lee in his prime.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:50 pm to Jim Rockford
Why do people think Bruce Lee was an actual fighter?
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:50 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:He also posted a picture of a fatass cheeseburger eating walking heart attack
You are naming the person who became famous for showcasing Brazilian Jiu Jitsu to the world... a martial art which is designed to beat people who are much larger.
this is the nfl lineman I have in mind
This post was edited on 8/15/18 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:51 pm to AU_251
Unfortunately nobody knows how good of a fighter Bruce Lee was. He was a good actor, but how good of a fighter we'll never know.
This post was edited on 8/15/18 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:51 pm to SoFla Tideroller
From his movies, I guess.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:53 pm to IceTiger
quote:
like DC just beat Stipe when he went back up a weight class, giving up 6 inches of height and more reach.
what this is in no way comparable. Dc actually weighed more than stipe in that fight. One man was not considerably stronger than the other. But there's a reason there are weight classes. Just about every heavyweight in UFC would knock tj dillishaw or mighty mouse Johnson's lights out. And those are 2 of if not the 2 greatest pound for pound fighters in the world. Yes size matters and a 6'7 300 pound athletic nfl lineman would absolutely maul Bruce lee in a ring or octagon. In a street fight Bruce would probably run away. I know I sure as hell would.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:57 pm to IceTiger
quote:
So, there's a point in weight and skill gap where it doesn't matter either way. If both fighters are equally skilled, the larger fighter will win 8.5/10 times... A smaller badass has a good chance versus a larger one...you see it in MMA ...like DC just beat Stipe when he went back up a weight class, giving up 6 inches of height and more reach.
I think that’s a good general assessment except to add that there are always unique variables to each fighter and fight. Even skill doesn’t speak to stamina and toughness, and big guys often lack the former and may not necessarily have the latter just because they are big.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 12:58 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Why do people think Bruce Lee was an actual fighter?
bruce lee beat chuck norris in Way of the dragon. fact
Posted on 8/15/18 at 1:00 pm to Boo Krewe
Bruce Lee killed Chuck Norris but death has been to afraid to tell him.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 1:07 pm to boom roasted
quote:
Yep. One of those dumbasses that lives in reality.
so, in your reality, a guy that trains and teaches, to a ridiculous extent, every day of his life can't fight? Even innovates new martial arts techniques, yea that guy can't fight. Never mind he actually did fight several times, and always won. But you're right. You're a realist. Idiot
Posted on 8/15/18 at 1:08 pm to Boo Krewe
And I have killed millions of special forces soldiers on Call of Duty. Fact.
Bruce Lee was a physical specimen. Very fast, very strong. For his weight class. But I have never seen a legitimate fight. All I see are off camera stories of people swearing he’s a fighting legend. Not enough for me. Word of mouth has a funny way of being exaggerated.
And boo hoo krewe is a troll.
Bruce Lee was a physical specimen. Very fast, very strong. For his weight class. But I have never seen a legitimate fight. All I see are off camera stories of people swearing he’s a fighting legend. Not enough for me. Word of mouth has a funny way of being exaggerated.
And boo hoo krewe is a troll.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 1:09 pm to AU_251
quote:
ever mind he actually did fight several times, and always won. But you're right. You're a realist. Idiot
Any proof of this?
Posted on 8/15/18 at 1:09 pm to AU_251
We have no idea if he can fight or not. He studied martial arts techniques. He practiced martial arts techniques. Could he actually perform in a fight? No idea.
He was a martial artist, a teacher, a philosopher, and an actor, not a fighter... because being a fighter means you actually fight. Right?
You think he can destroy ANY non-trained fighter, regardless of any athletic or size disadvantage? That's dumb as frick, dude.
He was a martial artist, a teacher, a philosopher, and an actor, not a fighter... because being a fighter means you actually fight. Right?
You think he can destroy ANY non-trained fighter, regardless of any athletic or size disadvantage? That's dumb as frick, dude.
Posted on 8/15/18 at 1:11 pm to DeafJam73
quote:Apparently he got into a street fight in China one time and fought another teacher one time, although the details are a bit sketchy.
Any proof of this?
If he were so confident in his fighting abilities, you'd think he'd actually enter a martial arts tournament.
Not one.
Martial artist, teacher, philosopher, actor. Not a fighter.
This post was edited on 8/15/18 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 8/15/18 at 1:13 pm to DeafJam73
Kevin Nash is about 6'11 and weighs around 350lbs. Chris Benoit was 5'9ish and weighed about 230lbs. I have heard shoot interviews from Nash on Benoit. He knew Benoit would beat his arse in a fight. Size can be overrated..
Posted on 8/15/18 at 1:13 pm to lsucoonass
quote:you need to look up the gracie's hunter. They were good because none knew what bjj was basically so no one game planned for it. Once you know what to expect it wasnt that effective
And Royce isn’t nowhere near the best in his family
Royler rickson Kron and roger are along with Carlos jr
When the ufc began rorian, the oldest decided to use Royce because royler although much smaller had greater technique. People would have thought it was fixed and rickson had too much muscle and the best technique so he picked Royce to show how effective their jiu jitsu was.
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News