Started By
Message

re: Bourbon Street renovation costs have DOUBLED

Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:07 pm to
Posted by monkeybutt
Member since Oct 2015
4583 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

Ok so you don't. That's what I figured.


I haven't claimed anything, therefore I don't need to bring anything to you. You made claims. And now are apparently skirting around them when asked to provide substance.

You're looking like an amateur in here mate.
Posted by Konkey Dong
Member since Aug 2013
2164 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:08 pm to
The bids are based on the engineering package provided by whomever the city contracted to do it. Those costs, plus administration costs, plus everything else should have been budgeted. Had it been done correctly, no way it goes that much over. You put contingency in a budget to cover unknowns, and if it's a lot of unknowns, you make sure you budget enough.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
140462 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:09 pm to
I just want to know where the $1.1B budget for 2017 has been spent thus far


That's ridiculous
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39731 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

It's not unusual for such a complicated project to double in cost. Happens all the time.

What a total crock of shite. I mean big time steaming pile.

This isn't project creep that slowly moved up. There haven't been massive changes to the project. Yet somehow if almost immediately doubles in price?

This is taxpayer theft straight up. First, lets skip the bid process and pretend to keep the cost down, then ramp it up and steal all we can.

New Detroit is shaping up nicely. Folks should be protesting the current administration not statues that nobody cared a single frick about prior to 2015.
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35640 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:14 pm to
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Where's the proof that it was a fraudulent bid?


In the Louisiana Public Bid Law.

Have you read it?

Because, even if you accept the original bid as legit, which I do not for a number of statutory reasons, the change order itself is fraudulent. Any change order outside the scope of the contract shall be let out for public bid if it exceeds the contract threshold defined herein.

Specifically you should familiarize yourself with Louisiana revised statute 38:2211 and 38:2212

And even if you want to argue that all of those things are legal or at the very least not proven fraudulent yet, at minimum you would have to agree that it is suspicious of a Mayor to award a contract to his own cousin as a "maintenence contract" and then have that contract explode into double the cost and time and still refuse to allow other entities to bid on it to make sure the city is getting the best deal.

Now, since I provided you with factual and legal citations for my arguments, would you care to provide me with links to a few other cities in similar situations? According to you, this is par for the course for most construction in most cities so it shouldn't be hard to find a few.

Or did you want to just come troll and drop some bullshite and hope no one called you on it. Go ahead. I'll wait for you to post multiple links to other cities Mayors giving out maintenence contracts that swell to over double cost through change orders with no alteration to the original contract or bid. And I'm not talking about a slow trickle of issues that move the price up. I'm taking about one time change orders that double the price and scope of the project.
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 4:23 pm
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134861 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

Yet somehow if almost immediately doubles in price?

Hate to break it to you but it's going to double again.
Posted by monkeybutt
Member since Oct 2015
4583 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

In the Louisiana Public Bid Law.

Have you read it?

Because, even if you accept the original bid as legit, which I do not for a number of statutory reasons, the change order itself is fraudulent. Any change order outside the scope of the contract shall be let out for public bid if it exceeds the contract threshold defined herein.

Specifically you should familiarize yourself with Louisiana revised statute 38:2211 and 38:2212

And even if you want to argue that all of those things are legal or at the very least not proven fraudulent yet, at minimum you would have to agree that it is suspicious of a Mayor to award a contract to his own cousin as a "maintenence contract" and then have that contract explode into double the cost and time and still refuse to allow other entities to bid on it to make sure the city is getting the best deal.

Now, since I provided you with factual and legal citations for my arguments, would you care to provide me with links to a few other cities in similar situations? According to you, this is par for the course for most construction in most cities so it shouldn't be hard to find a few.

Or did you want to just come troll and drop some bullshite and hope no one called you on it. Go ahead. I'll wait for you to post multiple links to other cities Mayors giving out maintenence contracts that swell to over double cost through change orders with no alteration to the original contract or bid. And I'm not talking about a slow trickle of issues that move the price up. I'm taking about one time change orders that double the price and scope of the project.




He's probably not gonna show back up in this thread because he's a lil bitch
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

Hate to break it to you but it's going to double again.



Do you know how much it's going to cost to repave the street for Mardi Gras, then rip it up again, then repave it for jazz fest, then rip it up again, then finish the project?
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:25 pm to
Mitch Landrieu

Worst Mayor Ever
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
26569 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:26 pm to
You'd be incorrect.

So if it was illegal why hasn't any action been taken? This is a pretty well-known project by now.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95477 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:29 pm to
Because the scope changes were just announced today and AG Landry isn't a fricking psychic?
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
20019 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:29 pm to
Are you going to provide any evidence you know anything about this subject?
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

So if it was illegal why hasn't any action been taken?


So your definition of fraudulent or illegal is things which have already been proven to be fraudulent or illegal in a court of law and outside of that there can be no discussion or critical thinking on the matter?

That's a terribly ignorant way to go through life.
Posted by monkeybutt
Member since Oct 2015
4583 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

You'd be incorrect.

So if it was illegal why hasn't any action been taken? This is a pretty well-known project by now.





What a joke of a question.


I'm still sitting here wondering why you haven't been able to provide us with these common place contract doubling constructions that happen EVERYWHERE.

Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32647 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:57 pm to
How many traffic plates can they weld together to get this taint of a project ready for Mardi Gras?
Posted by TheIrishFro
Member since Aug 2010
4709 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 5:23 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/4/23 at 3:45 am
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 5:23 pm to
quote:


Are you going to provide any evidence you know anything about this subject?


Bruh, his parents have a house in the French Quarter. What more evidence do you need??
Posted by TheOfficial
Member since Feb 2005
1376 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

What a colossal piece if human shite that guy is.


We may have a new record. He's surely beaten Bono for the number of Courics.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 8/23/17 at 5:36 pm to
I wish the stone cold stunner was as effective as it is when Austin does it.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram