- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:51 pm to AbitaFan08
quote:
Ever heard of the Big Dig, friend?
You're seriously comparing the most expensive TUNNELING boondoggle in US history with digging up a few blocks of Bourbon?
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:51 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
All Major cities have a Mayor who fraudulently hands a massive job to his cousin under the guise of maintenence contract in order to circumvent the bidding process?
While siphoning the funds from a federal crime prevention fund to pay for it.
A prevention fund that is sorely needed because that mayor ran the feds out of town by being impossible to work with and continues to blow money on stupid unnecessary shite instead of helping the city police department do its job?
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:51 pm to upgrayedd
Oops. Landrieu Post.
Aka Double unnecessary post.
Aka Double unnecessary post.
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:52 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Resurfacing 8 blocks of a single lane street.
I mean, the project had a shite load of unknown infrastructure. This comes down to poor planning and da Bitch trying to hurry this project through as a maintenance item instead of a full fledged project, but this isn't as easy a project as you imply.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:52 pm to upgrayedd
Construction is construction.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:53 pm to LSUMJ
I can understand a 2 or even 3 million miscalculation. But more than double the original anticipated cost? 
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:53 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Resurfacing 8 blocks of a single lane street.
It's way more involved that simply repaving bourbon
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:53 pm to AbitaFan08
quote:
Construction is construction.
You don't know anything about construction.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:53 pm to AbitaFan08
I guess the people downvoting for some reason think you're defending the mayor here. Pretty funny.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:54 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
I mean, the project had a shite load of unknown infrastructure.
I'm curious if they attempted to conduct a GPR survey.
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:54 pm to Breesus
quote:
quote:
Resurfacing 8 blocks of a single lane street.
It's way more involved that simply repaving bourbon
I understand. As I'm aware, however, I don't think they've faced anything that couldn't have (or shouldn't have) been reasonably anticipated with it. If so, I want to know what that is.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:55 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
I'm curious of they attempted to conduct a GPR survey.
Knowing da Bitch is involved, I assume the bare minimum of planning went into this. So I'd say it do not involve GPR
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:55 pm to AbitaFan08
quote:
this is par for the course for most construction projects
According to you, most construction projects are done with 0 investigation into the scope or intensity of the project and then allowed limitless change orders after a fraudulent awarding of a bid as a small maintenence project?
That's what you think most public construction is?
This post was edited on 8/23/17 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 8/23/17 at 3:57 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I don't think they've faced anything that couldn't have (or shouldn't have) been reasonably anticipated with it.
That would entirely depend on your idea of reasonable. I have no idea what issues they're encountering, but things can get expensive really quickly with unknow infrastructure. Saying they should have reasonably expected it kinda goes against the definition, doesn't it?
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:00 pm to Breesus
Where's the proof that it was a fraudulent bid?,Or are you just making up facts to fit your narrative?
I'll wait.
I'll wait.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:01 pm to AbitaFan08
quote:
but this is par for the course for most construction projects. Unless you have stats to show other cities are more efficient? I'll wait.
Considering you are the one that posited that this is normal for other cities to have doubled costs on a project, it seems to me that you should be providing stats.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:02 pm to monkeybutt
So you don't have any facts? Still waiting.
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:04 pm to AbitaFan08
quote:
So you don't have any facts? Still waiting.
Do you?
Posted on 8/23/17 at 4:05 pm to monkeybutt
Ok so you don't. That's what I figured.
Popular
Back to top


0





