Started By
Message

re: Boulder passes nations steepest sugary beverage tax - Agree or disagree?

Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:40 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

beverage tax


Disagree almost no matter what.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39244 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

two cents per fluid ounce



So a 44oz coke just got 88 cents more expensive? That's a 100% price increase on a thirst buster
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38577 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Will their fancy arse mocha sugary used to resemble coffee beverages be taxed? Doubt it

I looked it up and surprisingly it is taxed but alcoholic beverages aren't. Found my loophole.
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
27636 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:42 pm to
I see bootlegging in Boulder's future .... and I will love it.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
32445 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

what about alcohol?


That's a great idea. Oh wait...they already do that.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
39244 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Tons of jobs around here. Come join the dark (and by that i really mean extremely white) side


I really have been looking. More for the weed and a change of scenery. I'm at a point in my life where I could pick up and move anywhere tomorrow morning. Just gotta find a job out of state
This post was edited on 8/1/17 at 12:44 pm
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
33911 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:43 pm to
As long as people can't buy them with food stamps, I'm good with people buying sugary drinks at the lowest price available. Personal responsibilities should cover not drinking too many of them. Someone will inevitably bring up the fact that fit people will pay for the healthcare of fat people, and my response is that is a problem with our healthcare system, not sugary drink consumption
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38577 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Probably some study funded by the food industry.

Nah. It shouldn't be a big surprise that it's cheaper to drop dead of heart failure at 50 than it is to pay for medical care until 90.
This post was edited on 8/1/17 at 12:50 pm
Posted by ThatMakesSense
Fort Lauderdale
Member since Aug 2015
15281 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:44 pm to
What about refills?
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76781 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:46 pm to
but dey got da weed man !
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40810 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

“This is really a tax on the distribution of beverages, not a retail sales tax,” Harkins says. “And so we have to find out who all these distributors are; they’re not folks we’ve taxed before.”
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86734 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

“If you are trying to start a movement to regulate or tax sugar, Boulder is about as good a place as any on Earth to start,” he says.


is this something to be proud of?

Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

As long as people can't buy them with food stamps, I'm good with people buying sugary drinks at the lowest price available. 
You can buy soft drinks with food stamps.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:49 pm to
Terrible idea. Do gooders who never took an Econ class
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

I'd buy outside of Boulder and bring that shite back in bulk.


Exactly what will occur
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37599 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

What if I told you fat fricks cost the system less money?


ok
Posted by jdeval1
Member since Dec 2009
7525 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

That's a great idea. Oh wait...they already do that.

Why not put a big arse tax on everything that's unhealthy then? Fast food, fried chicken, booze, potato chips, pizza, burgers. We should tax people for the number of hours of TV that they watch.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
36181 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

“This is really a tax on the distribution of beverages, not a retail sales tax,” Harkins says.


It's sad that so many don't understand the stupidity of this statement.

"Don't worry. The cost of your coke isn't going to go up. Just the cost to those providing the coke to you."
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
70136 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:57 pm to
Get out of here hippy
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 8/1/17 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

It's sad that so many don't understand the stupidity of this statement.


True believers are socially awkward bubble dwellers. Apparently Boulder is full of them.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram