- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Border Patrol-involved shooting in Minneapolis; person shot was allegedly armed
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:24 am to Ingeniero
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:24 am to Ingeniero
quote:
We're quickly approaching the other side of the "but what if she said the N word," coin for excusing chimpouts. That poor officer was just stressed out and needed to walk up to the lady to shove her
If you want some next level Horseshoe Theory, LEO and lesbians commit abnormally high rates of domestic violence
0
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:24 am to chRxis
quote:
as an independent, this makes me wonder, what WOULD it take for a D to vote R or a R to vote D? like, for those of y'all so firmly rooted in your political party is there NOTHING that they can do that would make you say "nah, that's it", at least for the one election cycle, even? i've always been curious about that
It's going to be about voter enthusiasm, which is why every even-numbered year leading up to an election you see things like this happening that the power brokers use to rile up their bases.
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 10:25 am
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:25 am to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Now we're making shite up
Video evidence abounds yet you cretins still make these arguments, absolutely pathetic but exactly on track with people like you.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:25 am to Centinel
quote:
Pretti was a woman who was shoved?
You aren't following the conversation being had.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:26 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
This entire situation in Minnesota is the result of the political left refusing to hold anyone accountable or enforce the law in any substantive way.
Which is why, even given this outcome and my belief that ICE has some level culpability, I still fully support the ICE mandate in Minnesota.
I'm glad you got updated marching orders
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The national Left is responding to that.
The "national Left" has responded to ICE operations in many cities and states.
Yet there still seems to be a very glaring difference in how those situations were handled vice Minneapolis.
Why? I mean are you incapable of giving a straight answer? Or is your answer simply "lots of ICE agents" as to why Minneapolis has handled this differently?
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 10:28 am
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:27 am to Clames
quote:
Video evidence abounds yet you cretins still make these arguments, absolutely pathetic but exactly on track with people like you.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:29 am to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Of course, how dare we hold them to a higher standard.
you have to know this is a ridiculous statement considering the context.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:29 am to whatiknowsofar
quote:
I'm glad you got updated marching orders
Yeah, not advocating for complete lawlessness is “marching orders”
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You aren't following the conversation being had.
Oh, I'm following it very well. What I'm questioning is the cognitive jump from "woman pushed, so Pretti getting involved is justified"
Are you, as an attorney, asserting that it's a valid excuse to interfere with law enforcement if you see another person being pushed to the ground?
I mean I certainly don't think you'd hold that assertion. So then why bring it up as justification?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:30 am to Centinel
quote:
The "national Left" has responded to ICE operations in many cities and states.
Yet there still seems to be a very glaring difference in how those situations were handled vice Minneapolis.
Because the admin made MN the flash point, as my prior post (that you quoted and I've cited twice) clearly stated.
quote:
Yet there still seems to be a very glaring difference in how those situations were handled vice Minneapolis.
Which of these cities had the "largest ICE operation ever" announced in their cities?
quote:
Or is your answer simply "lots of ICE agents" as to why Minneapolis has handled this differently?
It's pretty clear
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:32 am to Klark Kent
quote:
you have to know this is a ridiculous statement considering the context.
What's ridiculous is what the ice officers did to alex and that woman yesterday. Zero attempt to de escalate, immediately assault a non violent American citizen
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's pretty clear
Ok, so it's pretty clear then that your answer as to why Minneapolis handled this differently is "lots of ICE agents"
Why? What is their reasoning? Do you think that reasoning is justified?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Would we deport more if they removed the agents from MN and sent them to a red area with more local cooperation? Yes.
If your goal is to remove the max number of illegals, that's a better policy
Because the systemic problems created by the massive illegal immigration caused by the administration has serious negative consequences for the entire Republic regardless of where these immigrants settle. Just focusing on Red States because they actually enforce the law exacerbates these problems.
The Democrat Party would absolutely love for Trump to only run ICE operations in red states.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:33 am to chRxis
There are lots of bad Republicans, there are no good Democrats. - Ann Coulter
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 10:35 am
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:33 am to Centinel
quote:
Why? What is their reasoning? Do you think that reasoning is justified?
I do think one reason, far from the only, is Walz was on the ticket against Trump/Vance
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:34 am to whatiknowsofar
which IYO justifies ICE being taunted, harassed, threatened, doxxed, and assaulted now and going forward?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:34 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
Because the systemic problems created by the massive illegal immigration caused by the administration has serious negative consequences for the entire Republic regardless of where these immigrants settle. Just focusing on Red States because they actually enforce the law exacerbates these problems.
The Democrat Party would absolutely love for Trump to only run ICE operations in red states.
This is very fair and good point.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:35 am to Centinel
quote:
Oh, I'm following it very well.
Not based on your last comment.
The shove references the woman shoved by the BP agent that started this whole shite show.
quote:
What I'm questioning is the cognitive jump from "woman pushed, so Pretti getting involved is justified"
He didn't seem to do much other than go to her and help her up.
quote:
Are you, as an attorney, asserting that it's a valid excuse to interfere with law enforcement if you see another person being pushed to the ground?
If LEO acts illegally, they aren't performing lawful duties. How can a citizen interfere with lawful duties that don't exist?
Was he justified in physical aggression or attacking LEO? No. All he did was get between the LEO acting illegally and the woman to help her up. LEO then escalated the situation further by macing people.
LEO, for no valid or lawful reason, escalated a situation, then escalated it further, and used this as a justification for shooting a man who was likely disarmed and who never physically threatened the officers (let alone in a way that gave a reasonable fear of death).
Posted on 1/25/26 at 10:35 am to Klark Kent
Don't bother. He was probably jerking it to the SCOTUS decision in Arizona v. United States.
Page 101 of 158
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News